Cargando…

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel IPOM procedure with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, and to compare the outcomes of this procedure with IPOM with- (IPOM-plus) and IPOM without (sIPOM) defect closure. METHOD: A si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, F., Sandblom, G., Wikner, A., Wallin, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9
_version_ 1784687852625330176
author Ali, F.
Sandblom, G.
Wikner, A.
Wallin, G.
author_facet Ali, F.
Sandblom, G.
Wikner, A.
Wallin, G.
author_sort Ali, F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel IPOM procedure with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, and to compare the outcomes of this procedure with IPOM with- (IPOM-plus) and IPOM without (sIPOM) defect closure. METHOD: A single-centre retrospective study comparing a novel IPOM technique with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) with the two commonly used IPOM techniques, IPOM with defect closure (IPOM-plus) and without defect closure (sIPOM). The intraoperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM ventral hernia repair were reviewed. Preoperative data, recurrence, and postoperative seroma, surgical site infection, and pain, were compared. RESULTS: From January 2017 to June 2020, a total of 213 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with IPOM technique. The mean length and width of the ventral hernia was 4.4 ± 1.8 cm and 3.6 ± 1.4 cm, respectively, and the mean BMI was 30.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2). The mean operating time was 67 ± 28 min and was longer for IPOM-pb (71 ± 27 min), less for IPOM-plus (63 ± 28 min), and least for sIPOM (61 ± 26 min). The incidence of early postoperative seroma was least in IPOM-pb (1/98, 1%), and similar in the IPOM-plus (4/94, 4%) and sIPOM (1/21, 5%) group. Late postoperative seroma was found only in IPOM-plus (2, 2%). The incidence of early and late postoperative pain was relatively higher in sIPOM (3, 14%; 1, 5%, respectively) compared to IPOM-pb and IPOM-plus in the early (5, 5% and 6, 6%) and late (2, 2% and 1, 1%) postoperative period, respectively. Surgical site infection was higher in sIPOM group (3, 14%), compared to IPOM-pb (1, 1%), and IPOM-plus (3, 3%). Recurrence rates were similar in IPOM-pb group (3/98, 3%) and IPOM-plus (3/94, 3%), and none in sIPOM (0/21). CONCLUSION: IPOM with peritoneal bridging is as feasible and safe as conventional IPOM with defect closure and simple non-defect closure. However, a large randomised controlled trial is required to confirm this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9012731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90127312022-05-02 Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging Ali, F. Sandblom, G. Wikner, A. Wallin, G. Hernia How-I-Do-It PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel IPOM procedure with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, and to compare the outcomes of this procedure with IPOM with- (IPOM-plus) and IPOM without (sIPOM) defect closure. METHOD: A single-centre retrospective study comparing a novel IPOM technique with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) with the two commonly used IPOM techniques, IPOM with defect closure (IPOM-plus) and without defect closure (sIPOM). The intraoperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM ventral hernia repair were reviewed. Preoperative data, recurrence, and postoperative seroma, surgical site infection, and pain, were compared. RESULTS: From January 2017 to June 2020, a total of 213 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with IPOM technique. The mean length and width of the ventral hernia was 4.4 ± 1.8 cm and 3.6 ± 1.4 cm, respectively, and the mean BMI was 30.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2). The mean operating time was 67 ± 28 min and was longer for IPOM-pb (71 ± 27 min), less for IPOM-plus (63 ± 28 min), and least for sIPOM (61 ± 26 min). The incidence of early postoperative seroma was least in IPOM-pb (1/98, 1%), and similar in the IPOM-plus (4/94, 4%) and sIPOM (1/21, 5%) group. Late postoperative seroma was found only in IPOM-plus (2, 2%). The incidence of early and late postoperative pain was relatively higher in sIPOM (3, 14%; 1, 5%, respectively) compared to IPOM-pb and IPOM-plus in the early (5, 5% and 6, 6%) and late (2, 2% and 1, 1%) postoperative period, respectively. Surgical site infection was higher in sIPOM group (3, 14%), compared to IPOM-pb (1, 1%), and IPOM-plus (3, 3%). Recurrence rates were similar in IPOM-pb group (3/98, 3%) and IPOM-plus (3/94, 3%), and none in sIPOM (0/21). CONCLUSION: IPOM with peritoneal bridging is as feasible and safe as conventional IPOM with defect closure and simple non-defect closure. However, a large randomised controlled trial is required to confirm this finding. Springer Paris 2021-09-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9012731/ /pubmed/34559335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle How-I-Do-It
Ali, F.
Sandblom, G.
Wikner, A.
Wallin, G.
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
title Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
title_full Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
title_fullStr Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
title_short Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
title_sort laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
topic How-I-Do-It
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alif laparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairusingintraperitonealonlaymeshwithperitonealbridging
AT sandblomg laparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairusingintraperitonealonlaymeshwithperitonealbridging
AT wiknera laparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairusingintraperitonealonlaymeshwithperitonealbridging
AT walling laparoscopicventralandincisionalherniarepairusingintraperitonealonlaymeshwithperitonealbridging