Cargando…

The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation

Introduction: Maintaining endotracheal tube intracuff pressure (ETTICP) within an optimal range is crucial for effective ventilation and prevention of aspiration. This study aimed to determine the effect of changing body position on ETTICP in patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: In the cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalali, Amir, Maleki, Zohreh, Dinmohammadi, Mohammadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603085
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.03
_version_ 1784687888725704704
author Jalali, Amir
Maleki, Zohreh
Dinmohammadi, Mohammadreza
author_facet Jalali, Amir
Maleki, Zohreh
Dinmohammadi, Mohammadreza
author_sort Jalali, Amir
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Maintaining endotracheal tube intracuff pressure (ETTICP) within an optimal range is crucial for effective ventilation and prevention of aspiration. This study aimed to determine the effect of changing body position on ETTICP in patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: In the current single-group study, each patient was taken as his/her own control. Thirty patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected as the study sample. First, the patients were placed in a supine (flat) position, head of the bed was raised to 30 degrees, and ETTICP was set at 25 cmH(2) O as the baseline. Then, the ETTICP changes in the three positions (left lateral, right lateral, and semi-fowler) were compared with the baseline. Interventions were made on a random basis among the patients. Data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA using SPSS version 13. Results: There was a significant difference among ETTICP means in three different body positions, so that ETTICP was higher in the left lateral position compared to other positions. Moreover, there was a significant difference among ETTICP means 0, 15, 45, and 90 minutes after changing the body position. ETTICP means after 0 and 15 minutes were significantly higher than other times compared to the baseline. Conclusion: ETTICP changes were affected by different body positions and the passage of time. Thus, regular monitoring and adjusting of ETTICP after any body positioning is essential, especially immediately and 15 minutes after repositioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9012898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90128982022-05-21 The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation Jalali, Amir Maleki, Zohreh Dinmohammadi, Mohammadreza J Caring Sci Original Article Introduction: Maintaining endotracheal tube intracuff pressure (ETTICP) within an optimal range is crucial for effective ventilation and prevention of aspiration. This study aimed to determine the effect of changing body position on ETTICP in patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: In the current single-group study, each patient was taken as his/her own control. Thirty patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected as the study sample. First, the patients were placed in a supine (flat) position, head of the bed was raised to 30 degrees, and ETTICP was set at 25 cmH(2) O as the baseline. Then, the ETTICP changes in the three positions (left lateral, right lateral, and semi-fowler) were compared with the baseline. Interventions were made on a random basis among the patients. Data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA using SPSS version 13. Results: There was a significant difference among ETTICP means in three different body positions, so that ETTICP was higher in the left lateral position compared to other positions. Moreover, there was a significant difference among ETTICP means 0, 15, 45, and 90 minutes after changing the body position. ETTICP means after 0 and 15 minutes were significantly higher than other times compared to the baseline. Conclusion: ETTICP changes were affected by different body positions and the passage of time. Thus, regular monitoring and adjusting of ETTICP after any body positioning is essential, especially immediately and 15 minutes after repositioning. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9012898/ /pubmed/35603085 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.03 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is published by Journal of Caring Sciences as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jalali, Amir
Maleki, Zohreh
Dinmohammadi, Mohammadreza
The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation
title The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation
title_full The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation
title_short The Effect of Different Body Positions on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation
title_sort effect of different body positions on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients under mechanical ventilation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603085
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.03
work_keys_str_mv AT jalaliamir theeffectofdifferentbodypositionsonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundermechanicalventilation
AT malekizohreh theeffectofdifferentbodypositionsonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundermechanicalventilation
AT dinmohammadimohammadreza theeffectofdifferentbodypositionsonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundermechanicalventilation
AT jalaliamir effectofdifferentbodypositionsonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundermechanicalventilation
AT malekizohreh effectofdifferentbodypositionsonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundermechanicalventilation
AT dinmohammadimohammadreza effectofdifferentbodypositionsonendotrachealtubecuffpressureinpatientsundermechanicalventilation