Cargando…

Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background In this study, we aimed to determine the performance of the lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a rural community. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCS at a rural healthcare institution from Septem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodily, Bridger, Ashurst, John, Fredriksen, Jason, Bedke, Brent, Braze, Adam, Matheny, Robert, Vlaminck, Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23299
_version_ 1784688008450015232
author Bodily, Bridger
Ashurst, John
Fredriksen, Jason
Bedke, Brent
Braze, Adam
Matheny, Robert
Vlaminck, Jay
author_facet Bodily, Bridger
Ashurst, John
Fredriksen, Jason
Bedke, Brent
Braze, Adam
Matheny, Robert
Vlaminck, Jay
author_sort Bodily, Bridger
collection PubMed
description Background In this study, we aimed to determine the performance of the lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a rural community. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCS at a rural healthcare institution from September 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019, to determine the utilization of screening, rate of positivity, rate of cancer detection, and patient compliance. Results A total of 1,474 patients underwent initial LCS, and 1,776 LCS examinations were performed using LDCT. Of 1,776 tests performed, 375 (21.1%) were categorized as positive (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System III or higher), with 215 of the 375 (57.6%) being lost to follow-up. A total of 29 malignancies were identified (in 1.6% of all LCS tests) during the study period, with 23 (82.8%) malignancies being low-stage malignancies (stage I or II), 24 (79.3%) malignancies potentially surgical candidates (stage IIIA or less), and five (17.2%) malignancies being non-surgical candidates based on stage (stage IIIB or IV). A total of 28.7% of all patients eligible for repeat screening had at least one repeat annual test. Overall, 9.9% of all patients eligible for two repeat annual tests had a second repeat annual test. Conclusions LCS using LDCT is effective in detecting lung cancer in a rural setting. However, compliance with repeat annual screening and recommendations for further workup is low. This may be exacerbated by healthcare and socioeconomic issues prevalent in rural communities. The use of LCS patient coordinators and dedicated tracking software may improve compliance with repeat annual screening and compliance with recommendations when LCS tests are positive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90135132022-04-22 Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study Bodily, Bridger Ashurst, John Fredriksen, Jason Bedke, Brent Braze, Adam Matheny, Robert Vlaminck, Jay Cureus Oncology Background In this study, we aimed to determine the performance of the lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a rural community. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCS at a rural healthcare institution from September 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019, to determine the utilization of screening, rate of positivity, rate of cancer detection, and patient compliance. Results A total of 1,474 patients underwent initial LCS, and 1,776 LCS examinations were performed using LDCT. Of 1,776 tests performed, 375 (21.1%) were categorized as positive (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System III or higher), with 215 of the 375 (57.6%) being lost to follow-up. A total of 29 malignancies were identified (in 1.6% of all LCS tests) during the study period, with 23 (82.8%) malignancies being low-stage malignancies (stage I or II), 24 (79.3%) malignancies potentially surgical candidates (stage IIIA or less), and five (17.2%) malignancies being non-surgical candidates based on stage (stage IIIB or IV). A total of 28.7% of all patients eligible for repeat screening had at least one repeat annual test. Overall, 9.9% of all patients eligible for two repeat annual tests had a second repeat annual test. Conclusions LCS using LDCT is effective in detecting lung cancer in a rural setting. However, compliance with repeat annual screening and recommendations for further workup is low. This may be exacerbated by healthcare and socioeconomic issues prevalent in rural communities. The use of LCS patient coordinators and dedicated tracking software may improve compliance with repeat annual screening and compliance with recommendations when LCS tests are positive. Cureus 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9013513/ /pubmed/35464508 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23299 Text en Copyright © 2022, Bodily et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bodily, Bridger
Ashurst, John
Fredriksen, Jason
Bedke, Brent
Braze, Adam
Matheny, Robert
Vlaminck, Jay
Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort results of lung cancer screening in a rural setting: a retrospective cohort study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23299
work_keys_str_mv AT bodilybridger resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ashurstjohn resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fredriksenjason resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT bedkebrent resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT brazeadam resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mathenyrobert resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vlaminckjay resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy