Cargando…
Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background In this study, we aimed to determine the performance of the lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a rural community. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCS at a rural healthcare institution from Septem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464508 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23299 |
_version_ | 1784688008450015232 |
---|---|
author | Bodily, Bridger Ashurst, John Fredriksen, Jason Bedke, Brent Braze, Adam Matheny, Robert Vlaminck, Jay |
author_facet | Bodily, Bridger Ashurst, John Fredriksen, Jason Bedke, Brent Braze, Adam Matheny, Robert Vlaminck, Jay |
author_sort | Bodily, Bridger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background In this study, we aimed to determine the performance of the lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a rural community. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCS at a rural healthcare institution from September 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019, to determine the utilization of screening, rate of positivity, rate of cancer detection, and patient compliance. Results A total of 1,474 patients underwent initial LCS, and 1,776 LCS examinations were performed using LDCT. Of 1,776 tests performed, 375 (21.1%) were categorized as positive (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System III or higher), with 215 of the 375 (57.6%) being lost to follow-up. A total of 29 malignancies were identified (in 1.6% of all LCS tests) during the study period, with 23 (82.8%) malignancies being low-stage malignancies (stage I or II), 24 (79.3%) malignancies potentially surgical candidates (stage IIIA or less), and five (17.2%) malignancies being non-surgical candidates based on stage (stage IIIB or IV). A total of 28.7% of all patients eligible for repeat screening had at least one repeat annual test. Overall, 9.9% of all patients eligible for two repeat annual tests had a second repeat annual test. Conclusions LCS using LDCT is effective in detecting lung cancer in a rural setting. However, compliance with repeat annual screening and recommendations for further workup is low. This may be exacerbated by healthcare and socioeconomic issues prevalent in rural communities. The use of LCS patient coordinators and dedicated tracking software may improve compliance with repeat annual screening and compliance with recommendations when LCS tests are positive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9013513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90135132022-04-22 Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study Bodily, Bridger Ashurst, John Fredriksen, Jason Bedke, Brent Braze, Adam Matheny, Robert Vlaminck, Jay Cureus Oncology Background In this study, we aimed to determine the performance of the lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a rural community. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCS at a rural healthcare institution from September 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019, to determine the utilization of screening, rate of positivity, rate of cancer detection, and patient compliance. Results A total of 1,474 patients underwent initial LCS, and 1,776 LCS examinations were performed using LDCT. Of 1,776 tests performed, 375 (21.1%) were categorized as positive (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System III or higher), with 215 of the 375 (57.6%) being lost to follow-up. A total of 29 malignancies were identified (in 1.6% of all LCS tests) during the study period, with 23 (82.8%) malignancies being low-stage malignancies (stage I or II), 24 (79.3%) malignancies potentially surgical candidates (stage IIIA or less), and five (17.2%) malignancies being non-surgical candidates based on stage (stage IIIB or IV). A total of 28.7% of all patients eligible for repeat screening had at least one repeat annual test. Overall, 9.9% of all patients eligible for two repeat annual tests had a second repeat annual test. Conclusions LCS using LDCT is effective in detecting lung cancer in a rural setting. However, compliance with repeat annual screening and recommendations for further workup is low. This may be exacerbated by healthcare and socioeconomic issues prevalent in rural communities. The use of LCS patient coordinators and dedicated tracking software may improve compliance with repeat annual screening and compliance with recommendations when LCS tests are positive. Cureus 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9013513/ /pubmed/35464508 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23299 Text en Copyright © 2022, Bodily et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Bodily, Bridger Ashurst, John Fredriksen, Jason Bedke, Brent Braze, Adam Matheny, Robert Vlaminck, Jay Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | results of lung cancer screening in a rural setting: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464508 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bodilybridger resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT ashurstjohn resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT fredriksenjason resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT bedkebrent resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT brazeadam resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT mathenyrobert resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT vlaminckjay resultsoflungcancerscreeninginaruralsettingaretrospectivecohortstudy |