Cargando…

Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings

Among the available dressings for partial‐thickness burn wound treatment, SUPRATHEL has shown good usability and effectiveness for wound healing and patient comfort and has been used in many burn centres in the last decade. Recently, bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) has become popular for the treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn, Aretz, Genoveva Friederike, Fuchs, Paul Christian, Bagheri, Mahsa, Funk, Martin, Schulz, Alexandra, Daniels, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13674
_version_ 1784688022862692352
author Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Aretz, Genoveva Friederike
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Bagheri, Mahsa
Funk, Martin
Schulz, Alexandra
Daniels, Marc
author_facet Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Aretz, Genoveva Friederike
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Bagheri, Mahsa
Funk, Martin
Schulz, Alexandra
Daniels, Marc
author_sort Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
collection PubMed
description Among the available dressings for partial‐thickness burn wound treatment, SUPRATHEL has shown good usability and effectiveness for wound healing and patient comfort and has been used in many burn centres in the last decade. Recently, bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) has become popular for the treatment of wounds, and many studies have demonstrated its efficacy. epicite(hydro), consisting of BNC and 95% water, is a promising product and has recently been introduced in numerous burn centres. To date, no studies including direct comparisons to existing products like SUPRATHEL have been conducted. Therefore, we aimed to compare epicite(hydro) to SUPRATHEL in the treatment of partial‐thickness burns. Twenty patients with partial‐thickness burns affecting more than 0.5% of their total body surface area (TBSA) were enrolled in this prospective, unicentric, open, comparative, intra‐individual clinical study. After debridement, the wounds were divided into two areas: one was treated with SUPRATHEL and the other with epicite(hydro). Wound healing, infection, bleeding, exudation, dressing changes, and pain were documented. The quality of the scar tissue was assessed subjectively using the Patient and Observer Scar Scale. Wound healing in patients with a mean TBSA of 9.2% took 15 to 16 days for both treatments without dressing changes. All wounds showed minimal exudation, and patients reported decreased pain with the only significant difference between the two dressings on day 1. No infection or bleeding occurred in any of the wounds. Regarding scar evaluation, SUPRATHEL and epicite(hydro) did not differ significantly. Both wound dressings were easy to use, were highly flexible, created a safe healing environment, had similar effects on pain reduction, and showed good cosmetic and functional results without necessary dressing changes. Therefore, epicite(hydro) can be used as an alternative to SUPRATHEL for the treatment of partial‐thickness burn wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90135772022-04-20 Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn Aretz, Genoveva Friederike Fuchs, Paul Christian Bagheri, Mahsa Funk, Martin Schulz, Alexandra Daniels, Marc Int Wound J Original Articles Among the available dressings for partial‐thickness burn wound treatment, SUPRATHEL has shown good usability and effectiveness for wound healing and patient comfort and has been used in many burn centres in the last decade. Recently, bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) has become popular for the treatment of wounds, and many studies have demonstrated its efficacy. epicite(hydro), consisting of BNC and 95% water, is a promising product and has recently been introduced in numerous burn centres. To date, no studies including direct comparisons to existing products like SUPRATHEL have been conducted. Therefore, we aimed to compare epicite(hydro) to SUPRATHEL in the treatment of partial‐thickness burns. Twenty patients with partial‐thickness burns affecting more than 0.5% of their total body surface area (TBSA) were enrolled in this prospective, unicentric, open, comparative, intra‐individual clinical study. After debridement, the wounds were divided into two areas: one was treated with SUPRATHEL and the other with epicite(hydro). Wound healing, infection, bleeding, exudation, dressing changes, and pain were documented. The quality of the scar tissue was assessed subjectively using the Patient and Observer Scar Scale. Wound healing in patients with a mean TBSA of 9.2% took 15 to 16 days for both treatments without dressing changes. All wounds showed minimal exudation, and patients reported decreased pain with the only significant difference between the two dressings on day 1. No infection or bleeding occurred in any of the wounds. Regarding scar evaluation, SUPRATHEL and epicite(hydro) did not differ significantly. Both wound dressings were easy to use, were highly flexible, created a safe healing environment, had similar effects on pain reduction, and showed good cosmetic and functional results without necessary dressing changes. Therefore, epicite(hydro) can be used as an alternative to SUPRATHEL for the treatment of partial‐thickness burn wounds. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9013577/ /pubmed/34390204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13674 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Aretz, Genoveva Friederike
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Bagheri, Mahsa
Funk, Martin
Schulz, Alexandra
Daniels, Marc
Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
title Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
title_full Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
title_fullStr Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
title_short Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
title_sort comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial‐thickness burn wounds treated with suprathel and epicte(hydro) wound dressings
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13674
work_keys_str_mv AT schieferjenniferlynn comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings
AT aretzgenovevafriederike comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings
AT fuchspaulchristian comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings
AT bagherimahsa comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings
AT funkmartin comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings
AT schulzalexandra comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings
AT danielsmarc comparisonofwoundhealingandpatientcomfortinpartialthicknessburnwoundstreatedwithsuprathelandepictehydrowounddressings