Cargando…

Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity

Complete healing is problematic as an endpoint for evaluating interventions for wound healing. The great heterogeneity of wounds makes it difficult to match groups, and this is only possible with multivariate stratification and/or very large numbers of subjects. The substantial time taken for wounds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bull, Richard Hillson, Staines, Karen Louise, Collarte, Agnes Juguilon, Bain, Duncan Shirreffs, Ivins, Nicola M., Harding, Keith Gordon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13669
_version_ 1784688024107352064
author Bull, Richard Hillson
Staines, Karen Louise
Collarte, Agnes Juguilon
Bain, Duncan Shirreffs
Ivins, Nicola M.
Harding, Keith Gordon
author_facet Bull, Richard Hillson
Staines, Karen Louise
Collarte, Agnes Juguilon
Bain, Duncan Shirreffs
Ivins, Nicola M.
Harding, Keith Gordon
author_sort Bull, Richard Hillson
collection PubMed
description Complete healing is problematic as an endpoint for evaluating interventions for wound healing. The great heterogeneity of wounds makes it difficult to match groups, and this is only possible with multivariate stratification and/or very large numbers of subjects. The substantial time taken for wounds to heal necessitates a very lengthy study. Consequently, high quality randomised controlled trials demonstrating an effect of an intervention to a satisfactory level of statistical significance and with a satisfactory level of generalisability are extremely rare. This study determines that the healing of venous leg ulcers receiving multi‐component compression bandaging follows a linear trajectory over a 4‐week period, as measured by gross area healed, percentage area healed, and advance of the wound margin. The linear trajectories of these surrogates make it possible to identify an acceleration in healing resulting from an intervention, and allows self‐controlled or crossover designs with attendant advantages of statistical power and speed. Of the metrics investigated, wound margin advance was the most linear, and was also independent of initial ulcer size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90135822022-04-20 Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity Bull, Richard Hillson Staines, Karen Louise Collarte, Agnes Juguilon Bain, Duncan Shirreffs Ivins, Nicola M. Harding, Keith Gordon Int Wound J Original Articles Complete healing is problematic as an endpoint for evaluating interventions for wound healing. The great heterogeneity of wounds makes it difficult to match groups, and this is only possible with multivariate stratification and/or very large numbers of subjects. The substantial time taken for wounds to heal necessitates a very lengthy study. Consequently, high quality randomised controlled trials demonstrating an effect of an intervention to a satisfactory level of statistical significance and with a satisfactory level of generalisability are extremely rare. This study determines that the healing of venous leg ulcers receiving multi‐component compression bandaging follows a linear trajectory over a 4‐week period, as measured by gross area healed, percentage area healed, and advance of the wound margin. The linear trajectories of these surrogates make it possible to identify an acceleration in healing resulting from an intervention, and allows self‐controlled or crossover designs with attendant advantages of statistical power and speed. Of the metrics investigated, wound margin advance was the most linear, and was also independent of initial ulcer size. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9013582/ /pubmed/34374499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13669 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bull, Richard Hillson
Staines, Karen Louise
Collarte, Agnes Juguilon
Bain, Duncan Shirreffs
Ivins, Nicola M.
Harding, Keith Gordon
Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity
title Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity
title_full Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity
title_fullStr Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity
title_full_unstemmed Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity
title_short Measuring progress to healing: A challenge and an opportunity
title_sort measuring progress to healing: a challenge and an opportunity
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13669
work_keys_str_mv AT bullrichardhillson measuringprogresstohealingachallengeandanopportunity
AT staineskarenlouise measuringprogresstohealingachallengeandanopportunity
AT collarteagnesjuguilon measuringprogresstohealingachallengeandanopportunity
AT bainduncanshirreffs measuringprogresstohealingachallengeandanopportunity
AT ivinsnicolam measuringprogresstohealingachallengeandanopportunity
AT hardingkeithgordon measuringprogresstohealingachallengeandanopportunity