Cargando…
A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk for detrimental complications even with current, standard of care (SOC) treatments. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare a unique resorbable glass microfiber matrix (Mirragen; Advanced Wound Matrix [BBGFM]; ETS Wound Care, R...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13675 |
_version_ | 1784688025367740416 |
---|---|
author | Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Carter, Marissa J. Zelen, Charles M. |
author_facet | Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Carter, Marissa J. Zelen, Charles M. |
author_sort | Armstrong, David G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk for detrimental complications even with current, standard of care (SOC) treatments. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare a unique resorbable glass microfiber matrix (Mirragen; Advanced Wound Matrix [BBGFM]; ETS Wound Care, Rolla, Missouri) compared with a standard of care group (SOC, collagen alginate dressing) at 12 weeks. Both groups received standard diabetic foot care including glucose monitoring, weekly debridements when needed and an offloading device. The primary endpoint was proportion of full‐thickness, non‐infected, non‐ischaemic wounds healed at 12 weeks, with secondary endpoints including percent area reduction (PAR) and changes in Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament testing. The result illustrated in the intent‐to‐treat analysis at 12 weeks showed that 70% (14/20) of the BBGFM‐treated DFUs healed compared with 25% (5/20) treated with SOC alone (adjusted P = .006). Mean PAR at 12 weeks was 79% in the BBGFM group compared with 37% in the SOC group (adjusted P = .027). Mean change in neuropathic score between baseline and up to 12 weeks of treatment was 2.0 in the BBGFM group compared with −0.6 in the SOC group where positive improvement in scores are better (adjusted P = .008). The mean number of BBGFM applications was 6.0. In conclusion, adding BBGFM to SOC significantly improved wound healing with no adverse events related to treatment compared with SOC alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9013587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90135872022-04-20 A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Carter, Marissa J. Zelen, Charles M. Int Wound J Original Articles Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk for detrimental complications even with current, standard of care (SOC) treatments. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare a unique resorbable glass microfiber matrix (Mirragen; Advanced Wound Matrix [BBGFM]; ETS Wound Care, Rolla, Missouri) compared with a standard of care group (SOC, collagen alginate dressing) at 12 weeks. Both groups received standard diabetic foot care including glucose monitoring, weekly debridements when needed and an offloading device. The primary endpoint was proportion of full‐thickness, non‐infected, non‐ischaemic wounds healed at 12 weeks, with secondary endpoints including percent area reduction (PAR) and changes in Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament testing. The result illustrated in the intent‐to‐treat analysis at 12 weeks showed that 70% (14/20) of the BBGFM‐treated DFUs healed compared with 25% (5/20) treated with SOC alone (adjusted P = .006). Mean PAR at 12 weeks was 79% in the BBGFM group compared with 37% in the SOC group (adjusted P = .027). Mean change in neuropathic score between baseline and up to 12 weeks of treatment was 2.0 in the BBGFM group compared with −0.6 in the SOC group where positive improvement in scores are better (adjusted P = .008). The mean number of BBGFM applications was 6.0. In conclusion, adding BBGFM to SOC significantly improved wound healing with no adverse events related to treatment compared with SOC alone. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9013587/ /pubmed/34418302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13675 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Carter, Marissa J. Zelen, Charles M. A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title | A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_full | A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_fullStr | A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_short | A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_sort | multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armstrongdavidg amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT orgilldennisp amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT galianorobertd amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT glatpaulm amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT didomenicolawrencea amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT cartermarissaj amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT zelencharlesm amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT armstrongdavidg multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT orgilldennisp multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT galianorobertd multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT glatpaulm multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT didomenicolawrencea multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT cartermarissaj multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT zelencharlesm multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers |