Cargando…

A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk for detrimental complications even with current, standard of care (SOC) treatments. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare a unique resorbable glass microfiber matrix (Mirragen; Advanced Wound Matrix [BBGFM]; ETS Wound Care, R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, David G., Orgill, Dennis P., Galiano, Robert D., Glat, Paul M., DiDomenico, Lawrence A., Carter, Marissa J., Zelen, Charles M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13675
_version_ 1784688025367740416
author Armstrong, David G.
Orgill, Dennis P.
Galiano, Robert D.
Glat, Paul M.
DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
Carter, Marissa J.
Zelen, Charles M.
author_facet Armstrong, David G.
Orgill, Dennis P.
Galiano, Robert D.
Glat, Paul M.
DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
Carter, Marissa J.
Zelen, Charles M.
author_sort Armstrong, David G.
collection PubMed
description Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk for detrimental complications even with current, standard of care (SOC) treatments. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare a unique resorbable glass microfiber matrix (Mirragen; Advanced Wound Matrix [BBGFM]; ETS Wound Care, Rolla, Missouri) compared with a standard of care group (SOC, collagen alginate dressing) at 12 weeks. Both groups received standard diabetic foot care including glucose monitoring, weekly debridements when needed and an offloading device. The primary endpoint was proportion of full‐thickness, non‐infected, non‐ischaemic wounds healed at 12 weeks, with secondary endpoints including percent area reduction (PAR) and changes in Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament testing. The result illustrated in the intent‐to‐treat analysis at 12 weeks showed that 70% (14/20) of the BBGFM‐treated DFUs healed compared with 25% (5/20) treated with SOC alone (adjusted P = .006). Mean PAR at 12 weeks was 79% in the BBGFM group compared with 37% in the SOC group (adjusted P = .027). Mean change in neuropathic score between baseline and up to 12 weeks of treatment was 2.0 in the BBGFM group compared with −0.6 in the SOC group where positive improvement in scores are better (adjusted P = .008). The mean number of BBGFM applications was 6.0. In conclusion, adding BBGFM to SOC significantly improved wound healing with no adverse events related to treatment compared with SOC alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90135872022-04-20 A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Carter, Marissa J. Zelen, Charles M. Int Wound J Original Articles Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk for detrimental complications even with current, standard of care (SOC) treatments. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare a unique resorbable glass microfiber matrix (Mirragen; Advanced Wound Matrix [BBGFM]; ETS Wound Care, Rolla, Missouri) compared with a standard of care group (SOC, collagen alginate dressing) at 12 weeks. Both groups received standard diabetic foot care including glucose monitoring, weekly debridements when needed and an offloading device. The primary endpoint was proportion of full‐thickness, non‐infected, non‐ischaemic wounds healed at 12 weeks, with secondary endpoints including percent area reduction (PAR) and changes in Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament testing. The result illustrated in the intent‐to‐treat analysis at 12 weeks showed that 70% (14/20) of the BBGFM‐treated DFUs healed compared with 25% (5/20) treated with SOC alone (adjusted P = .006). Mean PAR at 12 weeks was 79% in the BBGFM group compared with 37% in the SOC group (adjusted P = .027). Mean change in neuropathic score between baseline and up to 12 weeks of treatment was 2.0 in the BBGFM group compared with −0.6 in the SOC group where positive improvement in scores are better (adjusted P = .008). The mean number of BBGFM applications was 6.0. In conclusion, adding BBGFM to SOC significantly improved wound healing with no adverse events related to treatment compared with SOC alone. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9013587/ /pubmed/34418302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13675 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Armstrong, David G.
Orgill, Dennis P.
Galiano, Robert D.
Glat, Paul M.
DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
Carter, Marissa J.
Zelen, Charles M.
A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
title A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
title_full A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
title_fullStr A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
title_short A multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
title_sort multi‐centre, single‐blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13675
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongdavidg amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT orgilldennisp amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT galianorobertd amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT glatpaulm amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT didomenicolawrencea amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT cartermarissaj amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT zelencharlesm amulticentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT armstrongdavidg multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT orgilldennisp multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT galianorobertd multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT glatpaulm multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT didomenicolawrencea multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT cartermarissaj multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers
AT zelencharlesm multicentresingleblindedrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialevaluatingtheeffectofresorbableglassfibrematrixinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers