Cargando…
Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
The retrospective pragmatic real‐world data (RWD) study compared the healing outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 1150) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 1072) in out‐patient wound care centres. Median time to wound closu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34363311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13670 |
_version_ | 1784688026564165632 |
---|---|
author | Bosque, Brandon A. Frampton, Christopher Chaffin, Abigail E. Bohn, Gregory A. Woo, Kevin DeLeonardis, Candace Lepow, Brian D. Melin, M. Mark Madu, Tobe Dowling, Shane G. May, Barnaby C. H. |
author_facet | Bosque, Brandon A. Frampton, Christopher Chaffin, Abigail E. Bohn, Gregory A. Woo, Kevin DeLeonardis, Candace Lepow, Brian D. Melin, M. Mark Madu, Tobe Dowling, Shane G. May, Barnaby C. H. |
author_sort | Bosque, Brandon A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The retrospective pragmatic real‐world data (RWD) study compared the healing outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 1150) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 1072) in out‐patient wound care centres. Median time to wound closure was significantly (P = .0015) faster in the OFM group (14.6 ± 0.5 weeks) relative to the collagen/ORC group (16.4 ± 0.7). A sub‐group analysis was performed to understand the relative efficacy in DFUs requiring longer periods of treatment and showed that DFUs treated with OFM healed up to 5.3 weeks faster in these challenging wounds. The percentage of wounds closed at 36 weeks was significantly improved in OFM treated DFUs relative to the collagen/ORC. A Cox proportional hazards analysis showed OFM‐treated wounds had a 18% greater probability of healing versus wounds managed with collagen/ORC, and the probability increased to 21% when the analysis was adjusted for multiple variables. This study represents the first large retrospective RWD analysis comparing OFM and collagen/ORC and supports the clinical efficacy of OFM in the treatment of DFUs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9013592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90135922022-04-20 Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers Bosque, Brandon A. Frampton, Christopher Chaffin, Abigail E. Bohn, Gregory A. Woo, Kevin DeLeonardis, Candace Lepow, Brian D. Melin, M. Mark Madu, Tobe Dowling, Shane G. May, Barnaby C. H. Int Wound J Original Articles The retrospective pragmatic real‐world data (RWD) study compared the healing outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 1150) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 1072) in out‐patient wound care centres. Median time to wound closure was significantly (P = .0015) faster in the OFM group (14.6 ± 0.5 weeks) relative to the collagen/ORC group (16.4 ± 0.7). A sub‐group analysis was performed to understand the relative efficacy in DFUs requiring longer periods of treatment and showed that DFUs treated with OFM healed up to 5.3 weeks faster in these challenging wounds. The percentage of wounds closed at 36 weeks was significantly improved in OFM treated DFUs relative to the collagen/ORC. A Cox proportional hazards analysis showed OFM‐treated wounds had a 18% greater probability of healing versus wounds managed with collagen/ORC, and the probability increased to 21% when the analysis was adjusted for multiple variables. This study represents the first large retrospective RWD analysis comparing OFM and collagen/ORC and supports the clinical efficacy of OFM in the treatment of DFUs. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9013592/ /pubmed/34363311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13670 Text en © 2021 Aroa Biosurgery Limited. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bosque, Brandon A. Frampton, Christopher Chaffin, Abigail E. Bohn, Gregory A. Woo, Kevin DeLeonardis, Candace Lepow, Brian D. Melin, M. Mark Madu, Tobe Dowling, Shane G. May, Barnaby C. H. Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title | Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_full | Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_fullStr | Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_short | Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
title_sort | retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/orc in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34363311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosquebrandona retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT framptonchristopher retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT chaffinabigaile retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT bohngregorya retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT wookevin retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT deleonardiscandace retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT lepowbriand retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT melinmmark retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT madutobe retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT dowlingshaneg retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers AT maybarnabych retrospectiverealworldcomparativeeffectivenessofovineforestomachmatrixandcollagenorcinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcers |