Cargando…
A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34612569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13687 |
_version_ | 1784688026792755200 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Qing Liu, Dongying Wang, Xian Zhang, Yanli Fang, Song Qiu, Xianliang Chen, Qiu |
author_facet | Wen, Qing Liu, Dongying Wang, Xian Zhang, Yanli Fang, Song Qiu, Xianliang Chen, Qiu |
author_sort | Wen, Qing |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed by the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. A randomised‐effects model was applied to pool results according to the types of wounds or ulcers. Among 12 included studies, ozone was implemented by topical application (ozone gas bath, ozonated oil, ozone water flushing) and systematic applications including autologous blood immunomodulation and rectal insufflation. The results indicated compared with standard control therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, ozone therapy regardless of monotherapy or combined control treatment markedly accelerated the improvement of the wound area(standardised mean difference(SMD) = 66.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [46.18,86.90], P < .00001) and reduced the amputation rate (risk ration (RR) = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.24,0.54], P < .00001). But there is no improvement in the proportion of participants with completely healed wounds and length of hospital stay. No adverse events associated with ozone treatment have been reported. And the efficacy of ozone therapy for other wound types is still uncertain because of no sufficient studies. More high‐quality randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds or ulcers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9013593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90135932022-04-20 A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers Wen, Qing Liu, Dongying Wang, Xian Zhang, Yanli Fang, Song Qiu, Xianliang Chen, Qiu Int Wound J Original Articles This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed by the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. A randomised‐effects model was applied to pool results according to the types of wounds or ulcers. Among 12 included studies, ozone was implemented by topical application (ozone gas bath, ozonated oil, ozone water flushing) and systematic applications including autologous blood immunomodulation and rectal insufflation. The results indicated compared with standard control therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, ozone therapy regardless of monotherapy or combined control treatment markedly accelerated the improvement of the wound area(standardised mean difference(SMD) = 66.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [46.18,86.90], P < .00001) and reduced the amputation rate (risk ration (RR) = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.24,0.54], P < .00001). But there is no improvement in the proportion of participants with completely healed wounds and length of hospital stay. No adverse events associated with ozone treatment have been reported. And the efficacy of ozone therapy for other wound types is still uncertain because of no sufficient studies. More high‐quality randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds or ulcers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9013593/ /pubmed/34612569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13687 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wen, Qing Liu, Dongying Wang, Xian Zhang, Yanli Fang, Song Qiu, Xianliang Chen, Qiu A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
title | A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
title_full | A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
title_short | A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
title_sort | systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34612569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenqing asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT liudongying asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT wangxian asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT zhangyanli asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT fangsong asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT qiuxianliang asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT chenqiu asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT wenqing systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT liudongying systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT wangxian systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT zhangyanli systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT fangsong systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT qiuxianliang systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers AT chenqiu systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers |