Cargando…

A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers

This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Qing, Liu, Dongying, Wang, Xian, Zhang, Yanli, Fang, Song, Qiu, Xianliang, Chen, Qiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34612569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13687
_version_ 1784688026792755200
author Wen, Qing
Liu, Dongying
Wang, Xian
Zhang, Yanli
Fang, Song
Qiu, Xianliang
Chen, Qiu
author_facet Wen, Qing
Liu, Dongying
Wang, Xian
Zhang, Yanli
Fang, Song
Qiu, Xianliang
Chen, Qiu
author_sort Wen, Qing
collection PubMed
description This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed by the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. A randomised‐effects model was applied to pool results according to the types of wounds or ulcers. Among 12 included studies, ozone was implemented by topical application (ozone gas bath, ozonated oil, ozone water flushing) and systematic applications including autologous blood immunomodulation and rectal insufflation. The results indicated compared with standard control therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, ozone therapy regardless of monotherapy or combined control treatment markedly accelerated the improvement of the wound area(standardised mean difference(SMD) = 66.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [46.18,86.90], P < .00001) and reduced the amputation rate (risk ration (RR) = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.24,0.54], P < .00001). But there is no improvement in the proportion of participants with completely healed wounds and length of hospital stay. No adverse events associated with ozone treatment have been reported. And the efficacy of ozone therapy for other wound types is still uncertain because of no sufficient studies. More high‐quality randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds or ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90135932022-04-20 A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers Wen, Qing Liu, Dongying Wang, Xian Zhang, Yanli Fang, Song Qiu, Xianliang Chen, Qiu Int Wound J Original Articles This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed by the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. A randomised‐effects model was applied to pool results according to the types of wounds or ulcers. Among 12 included studies, ozone was implemented by topical application (ozone gas bath, ozonated oil, ozone water flushing) and systematic applications including autologous blood immunomodulation and rectal insufflation. The results indicated compared with standard control therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, ozone therapy regardless of monotherapy or combined control treatment markedly accelerated the improvement of the wound area(standardised mean difference(SMD) = 66.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [46.18,86.90], P < .00001) and reduced the amputation rate (risk ration (RR) = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.24,0.54], P < .00001). But there is no improvement in the proportion of participants with completely healed wounds and length of hospital stay. No adverse events associated with ozone treatment have been reported. And the efficacy of ozone therapy for other wound types is still uncertain because of no sufficient studies. More high‐quality randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds or ulcers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9013593/ /pubmed/34612569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13687 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wen, Qing
Liu, Dongying
Wang, Xian
Zhang, Yanli
Fang, Song
Qiu, Xianliang
Chen, Qiu
A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
title A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
title_full A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
title_fullStr A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
title_short A systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
title_sort systematic review of ozone therapy for treating chronically refractory wounds and ulcers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34612569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13687
work_keys_str_mv AT wenqing asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT liudongying asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT wangxian asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT zhangyanli asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT fangsong asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT qiuxianliang asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT chenqiu asystematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT wenqing systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT liudongying systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT wangxian systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT zhangyanli systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT fangsong systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT qiuxianliang systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers
AT chenqiu systematicreviewofozonetherapyfortreatingchronicallyrefractorywoundsandulcers