Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Styczynski, Ashley, Hemlock, Caitlin, Hoque, Kazi Injamamul, Verma, Renu, LeBoa, Chris, Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk, Nag, Auddithio, Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir, Amin, Mohammed Badrul, Andrews, Jason R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Global Health
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included nine hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ventilation characteristics and air samples were collected from 86 healthcare spaces during October 2020 to February 2021. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Risk of cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection by type of healthcare area. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ventilation rates by healthcare space; risk of airborne detection of SARS-CoV-2 across healthcare spaces; impact of room characteristics on absolute ventilation; SARS-CoV-2 detection by naturally ventilated versus mechanically ventilated spaces. RESULTS: The majority (78.7%) of naturally ventilated patient care rooms had ventilation rates that fell short of the recommended ventilation rate of 60 L/s/p. Using a modified Wells-Riley equation and local COVID-19 case numbers, we found that over a 40-hour exposure period, outpatient departments posed the highest median risk for infection (7.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was most frequently detected in air samples from non-COVID wards (50.0%) followed by outpatient departments (42.9%). Naturally ventilated spaces (22.6%) had higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with mechanically ventilated spaces (8.3%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128). In multivariable linear regression with calculated elasticity, open door area and cross-ventilation were found to have a significant impact on ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that naturally ventilated healthcare settings may pose a high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2, particularly among non-COVID-designated spaces, but improving parameters of ventilation can mitigate this risk.

Ejemplares similares