Cargando…

Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Styczynski, Ashley, Hemlock, Caitlin, Hoque, Kazi Injamamul, Verma, Renu, LeBoa, Chris, Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk, Nag, Auddithio, Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir, Amin, Mohammed Badrul, Andrews, Jason R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206
_version_ 1784688071141228544
author Styczynski, Ashley
Hemlock, Caitlin
Hoque, Kazi Injamamul
Verma, Renu
LeBoa, Chris
Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk
Nag, Auddithio
Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir
Amin, Mohammed Badrul
Andrews, Jason R
author_facet Styczynski, Ashley
Hemlock, Caitlin
Hoque, Kazi Injamamul
Verma, Renu
LeBoa, Chris
Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk
Nag, Auddithio
Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir
Amin, Mohammed Badrul
Andrews, Jason R
author_sort Styczynski, Ashley
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included nine hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ventilation characteristics and air samples were collected from 86 healthcare spaces during October 2020 to February 2021. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Risk of cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection by type of healthcare area. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ventilation rates by healthcare space; risk of airborne detection of SARS-CoV-2 across healthcare spaces; impact of room characteristics on absolute ventilation; SARS-CoV-2 detection by naturally ventilated versus mechanically ventilated spaces. RESULTS: The majority (78.7%) of naturally ventilated patient care rooms had ventilation rates that fell short of the recommended ventilation rate of 60 L/s/p. Using a modified Wells-Riley equation and local COVID-19 case numbers, we found that over a 40-hour exposure period, outpatient departments posed the highest median risk for infection (7.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was most frequently detected in air samples from non-COVID wards (50.0%) followed by outpatient departments (42.9%). Naturally ventilated spaces (22.6%) had higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with mechanically ventilated spaces (8.3%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128). In multivariable linear regression with calculated elasticity, open door area and cross-ventilation were found to have a significant impact on ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that naturally ventilated healthcare settings may pose a high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2, particularly among non-COVID-designated spaces, but improving parameters of ventilation can mitigate this risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90137892022-04-20 Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh Styczynski, Ashley Hemlock, Caitlin Hoque, Kazi Injamamul Verma, Renu LeBoa, Chris Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk Nag, Auddithio Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir Amin, Mohammed Badrul Andrews, Jason R BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included nine hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ventilation characteristics and air samples were collected from 86 healthcare spaces during October 2020 to February 2021. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Risk of cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection by type of healthcare area. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ventilation rates by healthcare space; risk of airborne detection of SARS-CoV-2 across healthcare spaces; impact of room characteristics on absolute ventilation; SARS-CoV-2 detection by naturally ventilated versus mechanically ventilated spaces. RESULTS: The majority (78.7%) of naturally ventilated patient care rooms had ventilation rates that fell short of the recommended ventilation rate of 60 L/s/p. Using a modified Wells-Riley equation and local COVID-19 case numbers, we found that over a 40-hour exposure period, outpatient departments posed the highest median risk for infection (7.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was most frequently detected in air samples from non-COVID wards (50.0%) followed by outpatient departments (42.9%). Naturally ventilated spaces (22.6%) had higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with mechanically ventilated spaces (8.3%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128). In multivariable linear regression with calculated elasticity, open door area and cross-ventilation were found to have a significant impact on ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that naturally ventilated healthcare settings may pose a high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2, particularly among non-COVID-designated spaces, but improving parameters of ventilation can mitigate this risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9013789/ /pubmed/35428628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Global Health
Styczynski, Ashley
Hemlock, Caitlin
Hoque, Kazi Injamamul
Verma, Renu
LeBoa, Chris
Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk
Nag, Auddithio
Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir
Amin, Mohammed Badrul
Andrews, Jason R
Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
title Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
title_full Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
title_fullStr Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
title_short Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
title_sort assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of sars-cov-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in bangladesh
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206
work_keys_str_mv AT styczynskiashley assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT hemlockcaitlin assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT hoquekaziinjamamul assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT vermarenu assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT leboachris assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT bhuiyanmdomarfaruk assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT nagauddithio assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT harunmdgolamdostogir assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT aminmohammedbadrul assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh
AT andrewsjasonr assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh