Cargando…
Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206 |
_version_ | 1784688071141228544 |
---|---|
author | Styczynski, Ashley Hemlock, Caitlin Hoque, Kazi Injamamul Verma, Renu LeBoa, Chris Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk Nag, Auddithio Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir Amin, Mohammed Badrul Andrews, Jason R |
author_facet | Styczynski, Ashley Hemlock, Caitlin Hoque, Kazi Injamamul Verma, Renu LeBoa, Chris Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk Nag, Auddithio Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir Amin, Mohammed Badrul Andrews, Jason R |
author_sort | Styczynski, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included nine hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ventilation characteristics and air samples were collected from 86 healthcare spaces during October 2020 to February 2021. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Risk of cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection by type of healthcare area. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ventilation rates by healthcare space; risk of airborne detection of SARS-CoV-2 across healthcare spaces; impact of room characteristics on absolute ventilation; SARS-CoV-2 detection by naturally ventilated versus mechanically ventilated spaces. RESULTS: The majority (78.7%) of naturally ventilated patient care rooms had ventilation rates that fell short of the recommended ventilation rate of 60 L/s/p. Using a modified Wells-Riley equation and local COVID-19 case numbers, we found that over a 40-hour exposure period, outpatient departments posed the highest median risk for infection (7.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was most frequently detected in air samples from non-COVID wards (50.0%) followed by outpatient departments (42.9%). Naturally ventilated spaces (22.6%) had higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with mechanically ventilated spaces (8.3%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128). In multivariable linear regression with calculated elasticity, open door area and cross-ventilation were found to have a significant impact on ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that naturally ventilated healthcare settings may pose a high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2, particularly among non-COVID-designated spaces, but improving parameters of ventilation can mitigate this risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9013789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90137892022-04-20 Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh Styczynski, Ashley Hemlock, Caitlin Hoque, Kazi Injamamul Verma, Renu LeBoa, Chris Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk Nag, Auddithio Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir Amin, Mohammed Badrul Andrews, Jason R BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in naturally ventilated hospital settings by measuring parameters of ventilation and comparing these findings with results of bioaerosol sampling. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. STUDY SETTING AND STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample included nine hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ventilation characteristics and air samples were collected from 86 healthcare spaces during October 2020 to February 2021. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Risk of cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection by type of healthcare area. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ventilation rates by healthcare space; risk of airborne detection of SARS-CoV-2 across healthcare spaces; impact of room characteristics on absolute ventilation; SARS-CoV-2 detection by naturally ventilated versus mechanically ventilated spaces. RESULTS: The majority (78.7%) of naturally ventilated patient care rooms had ventilation rates that fell short of the recommended ventilation rate of 60 L/s/p. Using a modified Wells-Riley equation and local COVID-19 case numbers, we found that over a 40-hour exposure period, outpatient departments posed the highest median risk for infection (7.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was most frequently detected in air samples from non-COVID wards (50.0%) followed by outpatient departments (42.9%). Naturally ventilated spaces (22.6%) had higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with mechanically ventilated spaces (8.3%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128). In multivariable linear regression with calculated elasticity, open door area and cross-ventilation were found to have a significant impact on ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that naturally ventilated healthcare settings may pose a high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2, particularly among non-COVID-designated spaces, but improving parameters of ventilation can mitigate this risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9013789/ /pubmed/35428628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Global Health Styczynski, Ashley Hemlock, Caitlin Hoque, Kazi Injamamul Verma, Renu LeBoa, Chris Bhuiyan, Md. Omar Faruk Nag, Auddithio Harun, Md. Golam Dostogir Amin, Mohammed Badrul Andrews, Jason R Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh |
title | Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh |
title_full | Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh |
title_fullStr | Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh |
title_short | Assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in Bangladesh |
title_sort | assessing impact of ventilation on airborne transmission of sars-cov-2: a cross-sectional analysis of naturally ventilated healthcare settings in bangladesh |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT styczynskiashley assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT hemlockcaitlin assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT hoquekaziinjamamul assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT vermarenu assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT leboachris assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT bhuiyanmdomarfaruk assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT nagauddithio assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT harunmdgolamdostogir assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT aminmohammedbadrul assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh AT andrewsjasonr assessingimpactofventilationonairbornetransmissionofsarscov2acrosssectionalanalysisofnaturallyventilatedhealthcaresettingsinbangladesh |