Cargando…

Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System

Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhe, Chong, Wei, Zhang, Huikun, Liu, Xiaoli, Zhao, Yawen, Guo, Zhifang, Fu, Li, Ma, Yongjie, Gu, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.784920
_version_ 1784688085189001216
author Wang, Zhe
Chong, Wei
Zhang, Huikun
Liu, Xiaoli
Zhao, Yawen
Guo, Zhifang
Fu, Li
Ma, Yongjie
Gu, Feng
author_facet Wang, Zhe
Chong, Wei
Zhang, Huikun
Liu, Xiaoli
Zhao, Yawen
Guo, Zhifang
Fu, Li
Ma, Yongjie
Gu, Feng
author_sort Wang, Zhe
collection PubMed
description Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with a worse prognosis as the pN3 stage. Until now, different reports on LNR in breast cancer have ignored this possibility. Consequently, it is necessary to discuss the role of APN(+) patients in the LNR system to obtain a precise LNR that predicts the prognosis accurately. Materials and Methods: We collected data on 10,120 breast cancer patients, including 3,936 lymph node-positive patients (3,283 APN(−) and 653 APN(+) patients), who visited our hospital from 2007 to 2012. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate cut-off values and conduct survival analysis and multivariate analysis to evaluate patients’ prognosis. Results: We confirmed that some APN(+) patients were mis-subgrouped according to previously reported LNR, indicating that APN(+) patients should be excluded in the application of LNR to predict prognosis. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate two cut-off values (0.15 and 0.34) for LNR-APN(−) patients and conducted survival analysis and found that LNR-APN(−) staging was superior to pN staging in predicting the prognosis of APN(−) breast cancer patients. Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that excluding APN(+) patients is the most necessary condition for effective implementation of the LNR system. LNR-APN(−) staging could be a more comprehensive approach in predicting prognosis and guiding clinicians to provide accurate and appropriate treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90138462022-04-19 Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System Wang, Zhe Chong, Wei Zhang, Huikun Liu, Xiaoli Zhao, Yawen Guo, Zhifang Fu, Li Ma, Yongjie Gu, Feng Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with a worse prognosis as the pN3 stage. Until now, different reports on LNR in breast cancer have ignored this possibility. Consequently, it is necessary to discuss the role of APN(+) patients in the LNR system to obtain a precise LNR that predicts the prognosis accurately. Materials and Methods: We collected data on 10,120 breast cancer patients, including 3,936 lymph node-positive patients (3,283 APN(−) and 653 APN(+) patients), who visited our hospital from 2007 to 2012. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate cut-off values and conduct survival analysis and multivariate analysis to evaluate patients’ prognosis. Results: We confirmed that some APN(+) patients were mis-subgrouped according to previously reported LNR, indicating that APN(+) patients should be excluded in the application of LNR to predict prognosis. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate two cut-off values (0.15 and 0.34) for LNR-APN(−) patients and conducted survival analysis and found that LNR-APN(−) staging was superior to pN staging in predicting the prognosis of APN(−) breast cancer patients. Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that excluding APN(+) patients is the most necessary condition for effective implementation of the LNR system. LNR-APN(−) staging could be a more comprehensive approach in predicting prognosis and guiding clinicians to provide accurate and appropriate treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9013846/ /pubmed/35445014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.784920 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Chong, Zhang, Liu, Zhao, Guo, Fu, Ma and Gu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Wang, Zhe
Chong, Wei
Zhang, Huikun
Liu, Xiaoli
Zhao, Yawen
Guo, Zhifang
Fu, Li
Ma, Yongjie
Gu, Feng
Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
title Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
title_full Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
title_short Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
title_sort breast cancer patients with positive apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes should be excluded in the application of the lymph node ratio system
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.784920
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhe breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT chongwei breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT zhanghuikun breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT liuxiaoli breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT zhaoyawen breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT guozhifang breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT fuli breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT mayongjie breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem
AT gufeng breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem