Cargando…
Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.784920 |
_version_ | 1784688085189001216 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Zhe Chong, Wei Zhang, Huikun Liu, Xiaoli Zhao, Yawen Guo, Zhifang Fu, Li Ma, Yongjie Gu, Feng |
author_facet | Wang, Zhe Chong, Wei Zhang, Huikun Liu, Xiaoli Zhao, Yawen Guo, Zhifang Fu, Li Ma, Yongjie Gu, Feng |
author_sort | Wang, Zhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with a worse prognosis as the pN3 stage. Until now, different reports on LNR in breast cancer have ignored this possibility. Consequently, it is necessary to discuss the role of APN(+) patients in the LNR system to obtain a precise LNR that predicts the prognosis accurately. Materials and Methods: We collected data on 10,120 breast cancer patients, including 3,936 lymph node-positive patients (3,283 APN(−) and 653 APN(+) patients), who visited our hospital from 2007 to 2012. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate cut-off values and conduct survival analysis and multivariate analysis to evaluate patients’ prognosis. Results: We confirmed that some APN(+) patients were mis-subgrouped according to previously reported LNR, indicating that APN(+) patients should be excluded in the application of LNR to predict prognosis. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate two cut-off values (0.15 and 0.34) for LNR-APN(−) patients and conducted survival analysis and found that LNR-APN(−) staging was superior to pN staging in predicting the prognosis of APN(−) breast cancer patients. Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that excluding APN(+) patients is the most necessary condition for effective implementation of the LNR system. LNR-APN(−) staging could be a more comprehensive approach in predicting prognosis and guiding clinicians to provide accurate and appropriate treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9013846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90138462022-04-19 Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System Wang, Zhe Chong, Wei Zhang, Huikun Liu, Xiaoli Zhao, Yawen Guo, Zhifang Fu, Li Ma, Yongjie Gu, Feng Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with a worse prognosis as the pN3 stage. Until now, different reports on LNR in breast cancer have ignored this possibility. Consequently, it is necessary to discuss the role of APN(+) patients in the LNR system to obtain a precise LNR that predicts the prognosis accurately. Materials and Methods: We collected data on 10,120 breast cancer patients, including 3,936 lymph node-positive patients (3,283 APN(−) and 653 APN(+) patients), who visited our hospital from 2007 to 2012. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate cut-off values and conduct survival analysis and multivariate analysis to evaluate patients’ prognosis. Results: We confirmed that some APN(+) patients were mis-subgrouped according to previously reported LNR, indicating that APN(+) patients should be excluded in the application of LNR to predict prognosis. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate two cut-off values (0.15 and 0.34) for LNR-APN(−) patients and conducted survival analysis and found that LNR-APN(−) staging was superior to pN staging in predicting the prognosis of APN(−) breast cancer patients. Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that excluding APN(+) patients is the most necessary condition for effective implementation of the LNR system. LNR-APN(−) staging could be a more comprehensive approach in predicting prognosis and guiding clinicians to provide accurate and appropriate treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9013846/ /pubmed/35445014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.784920 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Chong, Zhang, Liu, Zhao, Guo, Fu, Ma and Gu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cell and Developmental Biology Wang, Zhe Chong, Wei Zhang, Huikun Liu, Xiaoli Zhao, Yawen Guo, Zhifang Fu, Li Ma, Yongjie Gu, Feng Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System |
title | Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System |
title_full | Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System |
title_fullStr | Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System |
title_short | Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System |
title_sort | breast cancer patients with positive apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes should be excluded in the application of the lymph node ratio system |
topic | Cell and Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.784920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangzhe breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT chongwei breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT zhanghuikun breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT liuxiaoli breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT zhaoyawen breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT guozhifang breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT fuli breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT mayongjie breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem AT gufeng breastcancerpatientswithpositiveapicalorinfraclavicularipsilateralsupraclavicularlymphnodesshouldbeexcludedintheapplicationofthelymphnoderatiosystem |