Cargando…

Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?

AIM OF THE STUDY: High-speed bone machining devices with irrigation fluid were used in surgery to spread aerosols and toss tissue particles of varying morphology into the operating room. Based on measurements taken on a phantom object, the shape, size, and spatial contamination distribution of such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putzer, David, Dammerer, Dietmar, Huber, Cora, Boschert, Harald, Thaler, Martin, Nogler, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05398-x
_version_ 1784688115966803968
author Putzer, David
Dammerer, Dietmar
Huber, Cora
Boschert, Harald
Thaler, Martin
Nogler, Michael
author_facet Putzer, David
Dammerer, Dietmar
Huber, Cora
Boschert, Harald
Thaler, Martin
Nogler, Michael
author_sort Putzer, David
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: High-speed bone machining devices with irrigation fluid were used in surgery to spread aerosols and toss tissue particles of varying morphology into the operating room. Based on measurements taken on a phantom object, the shape, size, and spatial contamination distribution of such particles were assessed. METHOD: Cadaveric femoral heads were continuously machined with a spherical bur, manually held at a fixed attack angle. The irrigation fluid used during bone machining was enriched with bacteria to act as a tracer to quantify the spatial contamination. A vertical board equipped with snippets served as a phantom object to assess contamination load and morphology of airborne particles. RESULTS: Eight-nine percent of the particles had a non-circular cross section. The detected particle size ranged across six orders of magnitude, from 0.006 to 4 mm2 with a median particle size of 0.125 mm2. The CFU counts observed after the standard machining time ranged from 7 to 240, with a median of 2 CFUs. The highest median contamination was seen at the upper right corner of the phantom. DISCUSSION: The experiments show that contaminating particles of a wide variety of shapes and sizes are part of the aerosol created by high-speed burring. While protection of personnel and equipment is always important, surgical helmets should be worn, especially at contamination hotspots, and gloves should be replaced at the end of machining. Sensitive instruments and measuring devices—such as optical sensors—should also be protected effectively, as the optical measurement may be obstructed by aerosol particles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9013979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90139792022-04-18 Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention? Putzer, David Dammerer, Dietmar Huber, Cora Boschert, Harald Thaler, Martin Nogler, Michael Int Orthop Original Paper AIM OF THE STUDY: High-speed bone machining devices with irrigation fluid were used in surgery to spread aerosols and toss tissue particles of varying morphology into the operating room. Based on measurements taken on a phantom object, the shape, size, and spatial contamination distribution of such particles were assessed. METHOD: Cadaveric femoral heads were continuously machined with a spherical bur, manually held at a fixed attack angle. The irrigation fluid used during bone machining was enriched with bacteria to act as a tracer to quantify the spatial contamination. A vertical board equipped with snippets served as a phantom object to assess contamination load and morphology of airborne particles. RESULTS: Eight-nine percent of the particles had a non-circular cross section. The detected particle size ranged across six orders of magnitude, from 0.006 to 4 mm2 with a median particle size of 0.125 mm2. The CFU counts observed after the standard machining time ranged from 7 to 240, with a median of 2 CFUs. The highest median contamination was seen at the upper right corner of the phantom. DISCUSSION: The experiments show that contaminating particles of a wide variety of shapes and sizes are part of the aerosol created by high-speed burring. While protection of personnel and equipment is always important, surgical helmets should be worn, especially at contamination hotspots, and gloves should be replaced at the end of machining. Sensitive instruments and measuring devices—such as optical sensors—should also be protected effectively, as the optical measurement may be obstructed by aerosol particles. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-18 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9013979/ /pubmed/35435476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05398-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Putzer, David
Dammerer, Dietmar
Huber, Cora
Boschert, Harald
Thaler, Martin
Nogler, Michael
Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
title Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
title_full Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
title_fullStr Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
title_short Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
title_sort aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05398-x
work_keys_str_mv AT putzerdavid aerosolmorphologyandparticlesizedistributioninorthopaedicbonemachiningalaboratoryworstcasecontaminationsimulationishighspeedbonemachiningpotentiallyharmfulbypollutionandqualityschemesandwhatmeasurescouldbetakenforprevention
AT dammererdietmar aerosolmorphologyandparticlesizedistributioninorthopaedicbonemachiningalaboratoryworstcasecontaminationsimulationishighspeedbonemachiningpotentiallyharmfulbypollutionandqualityschemesandwhatmeasurescouldbetakenforprevention
AT hubercora aerosolmorphologyandparticlesizedistributioninorthopaedicbonemachiningalaboratoryworstcasecontaminationsimulationishighspeedbonemachiningpotentiallyharmfulbypollutionandqualityschemesandwhatmeasurescouldbetakenforprevention
AT boschertharald aerosolmorphologyandparticlesizedistributioninorthopaedicbonemachiningalaboratoryworstcasecontaminationsimulationishighspeedbonemachiningpotentiallyharmfulbypollutionandqualityschemesandwhatmeasurescouldbetakenforprevention
AT thalermartin aerosolmorphologyandparticlesizedistributioninorthopaedicbonemachiningalaboratoryworstcasecontaminationsimulationishighspeedbonemachiningpotentiallyharmfulbypollutionandqualityschemesandwhatmeasurescouldbetakenforprevention
AT noglermichael aerosolmorphologyandparticlesizedistributioninorthopaedicbonemachiningalaboratoryworstcasecontaminationsimulationishighspeedbonemachiningpotentiallyharmfulbypollutionandqualityschemesandwhatmeasurescouldbetakenforprevention