Cargando…

Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)

INTRODUCTION: European Association of Urology and UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that all men with suspicions of prostate cancer should undergo prebiopsy contrast enhanced, that is, multiparametric prostate MRI. Subsequent prostate biopsies should also be p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ettala, Otto, Jambor, Ivan, Montoya Perez, Ileana, Seppänen, Marjo, Kaipia, Antti, Seikkula, Heikki, Syvänen, Kari T, Taimen, Pekka, Verho, Janne, Steiner, Aida, Saunavaara, Jani, Saukko, Ekaterina, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Sjoberg, Daniel D, Vickers, Andrew, Aronen, Hannu, Boström, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053118
_version_ 1784688127811518464
author Ettala, Otto
Jambor, Ivan
Montoya Perez, Ileana
Seppänen, Marjo
Kaipia, Antti
Seikkula, Heikki
Syvänen, Kari T
Taimen, Pekka
Verho, Janne
Steiner, Aida
Saunavaara, Jani
Saukko, Ekaterina
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Sjoberg, Daniel D
Vickers, Andrew
Aronen, Hannu
Boström, Peter
author_facet Ettala, Otto
Jambor, Ivan
Montoya Perez, Ileana
Seppänen, Marjo
Kaipia, Antti
Seikkula, Heikki
Syvänen, Kari T
Taimen, Pekka
Verho, Janne
Steiner, Aida
Saunavaara, Jani
Saukko, Ekaterina
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Sjoberg, Daniel D
Vickers, Andrew
Aronen, Hannu
Boström, Peter
author_sort Ettala, Otto
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: European Association of Urology and UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that all men with suspicions of prostate cancer should undergo prebiopsy contrast enhanced, that is, multiparametric prostate MRI. Subsequent prostate biopsies should also be performed if MRI is positive, that is, Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores 3–5. However, several retrospective post hoc analyses have shown that this approach still leads to many unnecessary biopsy procedures. For example, 88%–96% of men with PI-RADS, three findings are still diagnosed with clinically non-significant prostate cancer or no cancer at all. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial, being conducted in Finland, to demonstrate non-inferiority in clinically significant cancer detection rates among men undergoing prostate biopsies post-MRI and men undergoing prostate biopsies post-MRI only after a shared decision based on individualised risk estimation. Men without previous diagnosis of prostate cancer and with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and/or prostate-specific antigen between 2.5 ug/L and 20.0 ug/L are included. We aim to recruit 830 men who are randomised at a 1:1 ratio into control (all undergo biopsies after MRI) and intervention arms (the decision to perform biopsies is based on risk estimation and shared decision-making). The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher). We will also compare the overall biopsy rate, benign biopsy rate and the detection of non-significant prostate cancer between the two study groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study (protocol V.2.0, 4 January 2021) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland (IORG number: 0001744, IBR number: 00002216; trial number: 99/1801/2019). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. Full reports of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, mainly urology and radiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04287088; the study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9014036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90140362022-05-02 Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0) Ettala, Otto Jambor, Ivan Montoya Perez, Ileana Seppänen, Marjo Kaipia, Antti Seikkula, Heikki Syvänen, Kari T Taimen, Pekka Verho, Janne Steiner, Aida Saunavaara, Jani Saukko, Ekaterina Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Sjoberg, Daniel D Vickers, Andrew Aronen, Hannu Boström, Peter BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: European Association of Urology and UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that all men with suspicions of prostate cancer should undergo prebiopsy contrast enhanced, that is, multiparametric prostate MRI. Subsequent prostate biopsies should also be performed if MRI is positive, that is, Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores 3–5. However, several retrospective post hoc analyses have shown that this approach still leads to many unnecessary biopsy procedures. For example, 88%–96% of men with PI-RADS, three findings are still diagnosed with clinically non-significant prostate cancer or no cancer at all. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial, being conducted in Finland, to demonstrate non-inferiority in clinically significant cancer detection rates among men undergoing prostate biopsies post-MRI and men undergoing prostate biopsies post-MRI only after a shared decision based on individualised risk estimation. Men without previous diagnosis of prostate cancer and with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and/or prostate-specific antigen between 2.5 ug/L and 20.0 ug/L are included. We aim to recruit 830 men who are randomised at a 1:1 ratio into control (all undergo biopsies after MRI) and intervention arms (the decision to perform biopsies is based on risk estimation and shared decision-making). The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher). We will also compare the overall biopsy rate, benign biopsy rate and the detection of non-significant prostate cancer between the two study groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study (protocol V.2.0, 4 January 2021) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland (IORG number: 0001744, IBR number: 00002216; trial number: 99/1801/2019). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. Full reports of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, mainly urology and radiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04287088; the study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9014036/ /pubmed/35428621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053118 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Urology
Ettala, Otto
Jambor, Ivan
Montoya Perez, Ileana
Seppänen, Marjo
Kaipia, Antti
Seikkula, Heikki
Syvänen, Kari T
Taimen, Pekka
Verho, Janne
Steiner, Aida
Saunavaara, Jani
Saukko, Ekaterina
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Sjoberg, Daniel D
Vickers, Andrew
Aronen, Hannu
Boström, Peter
Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)
title Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)
title_full Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)
title_fullStr Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)
title_full_unstemmed Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)
title_short Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)
title_sort individualised non-contrast mri-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-improd v.2.0)
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053118
work_keys_str_mv AT ettalaotto individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT jamborivan individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT montoyaperezileana individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT seppanenmarjo individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT kaipiaantti individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT seikkulaheikki individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT syvanenkarit individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT taimenpekka individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT verhojanne individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT steineraida individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT saunavaarajani individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT saukkoekaterina individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT loyttyniemieliisa individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT sjobergdanield individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT vickersandrew individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT aronenhannu individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20
AT bostrompeter individualisednoncontrastmribasedriskestimationandshareddecisionmakinginmenwithasuspicionofprostatecancerprotocolformulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmultiimprodv20