Cargando…
Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study
OBJECTIVES: To explore allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain, in order to identify their information needs prior to the procedure. DESIGN: We conducted focus groups interviews with allophone women from five different linguistic immigrant communit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057125 |
_version_ | 1784688134676545536 |
---|---|
author | Dominicé Dao, Melissa Gerosa, Désirée Pélieu, Iris Haller, Guy |
author_facet | Dominicé Dao, Melissa Gerosa, Désirée Pélieu, Iris Haller, Guy |
author_sort | Dominicé Dao, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain, in order to identify their information needs prior to the procedure. DESIGN: We conducted focus groups interviews with allophone women from five different linguistic immigrant communities, with the aid of professional interpreters. Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts was carried out by all authors. SETTING: Women were recruited at two non-profit associations offering French language and cultural integration training to non-French speaking immigrant women in Geneva. PARTICIPANTS: Forty women from 10 countries who spoke either Albanian, Arabic, Farsi/Dari, Tamil or Tigrigna took part in the five focus groups. Four participants were nulliparous, but all others had previous experience of labour and delivery, often in European countries. A single focus group was conducted for each of the five language groups. RESULTS: We identified five main themes: (1) Women’s partial knowledge of epidural analgesia procedures; (2) Strong fears of short-term and long-term negative consequences of epidural analgesia during childbirth; (3) Reliance on multiple sources of information regarding epidural analgesia for childbirth; (4) Presentation of salient narratives of labour pain to justify their attitudes toward epidural analgesia; and (5) Complex community positioning of pro-epidural women. CONCLUSIONS: Women in our study had partial knowledge of epidural analgesia for labour pain and held perceptions of a high risk-to-benefits ratio for this procedure. Diverse and sometimes conflicting information about epidural analgesia can interfere with women’s decisions regarding this treatment option for labour pain. Our study suggests that women need comprehensive but also tailored information in their own language to support their decision-making regarding epidural labour analgesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9014067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90140672022-05-02 Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study Dominicé Dao, Melissa Gerosa, Désirée Pélieu, Iris Haller, Guy BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To explore allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain, in order to identify their information needs prior to the procedure. DESIGN: We conducted focus groups interviews with allophone women from five different linguistic immigrant communities, with the aid of professional interpreters. Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts was carried out by all authors. SETTING: Women were recruited at two non-profit associations offering French language and cultural integration training to non-French speaking immigrant women in Geneva. PARTICIPANTS: Forty women from 10 countries who spoke either Albanian, Arabic, Farsi/Dari, Tamil or Tigrigna took part in the five focus groups. Four participants were nulliparous, but all others had previous experience of labour and delivery, often in European countries. A single focus group was conducted for each of the five language groups. RESULTS: We identified five main themes: (1) Women’s partial knowledge of epidural analgesia procedures; (2) Strong fears of short-term and long-term negative consequences of epidural analgesia during childbirth; (3) Reliance on multiple sources of information regarding epidural analgesia for childbirth; (4) Presentation of salient narratives of labour pain to justify their attitudes toward epidural analgesia; and (5) Complex community positioning of pro-epidural women. CONCLUSIONS: Women in our study had partial knowledge of epidural analgesia for labour pain and held perceptions of a high risk-to-benefits ratio for this procedure. Diverse and sometimes conflicting information about epidural analgesia can interfere with women’s decisions regarding this treatment option for labour pain. Our study suggests that women need comprehensive but also tailored information in their own language to support their decision-making regarding epidural labour analgesia. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9014067/ /pubmed/35428638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057125 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Dominicé Dao, Melissa Gerosa, Désirée Pélieu, Iris Haller, Guy Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
title | Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
title_full | Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
title_short | Allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
title_sort | allophone immigrant women’s knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35428638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dominicedaomelissa allophoneimmigrantwomensknowledgeandperceptionsofepiduralanalgesiaforlabourpainaqualitativestudy AT gerosadesiree allophoneimmigrantwomensknowledgeandperceptionsofepiduralanalgesiaforlabourpainaqualitativestudy AT pelieuiris allophoneimmigrantwomensknowledgeandperceptionsofepiduralanalgesiaforlabourpainaqualitativestudy AT hallerguy allophoneimmigrantwomensknowledgeandperceptionsofepiduralanalgesiaforlabourpainaqualitativestudy |