Cargando…
Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry
OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) created the National ALS Registry (Registry) to examine the epidemiology of ALS and potential risk factors. We are currently recruiting population-based controls for an epidemiologic case-control study to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2021.1887262 |
_version_ | 1784688183598907392 |
---|---|
author | BEAR, TODD M. MALEK, ANGELA M. FOULDS, ABIGAIL RAGER, JUDITH DEPERRIOR, SARAH E. VENA, JOHN E. LARSON, THEODORE C. MEHTA, PAUL HORTON, D. KEVIN TALBOTT, EVELYN O. |
author_facet | BEAR, TODD M. MALEK, ANGELA M. FOULDS, ABIGAIL RAGER, JUDITH DEPERRIOR, SARAH E. VENA, JOHN E. LARSON, THEODORE C. MEHTA, PAUL HORTON, D. KEVIN TALBOTT, EVELYN O. |
author_sort | BEAR, TODD M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) created the National ALS Registry (Registry) to examine the epidemiology of ALS and potential risk factors. We are currently recruiting population-based controls for an epidemiologic case-control study to examine ALS environmental risk factors using this Registry. To date, we have recruited 181 non-diseased, population-based controls for comparison to Registry cases (n = 280). Here we report our recruitment methods for controls and the associated response rates and costs. METHODS: Eligible ALS cases had complete risk factor survey data, DNA analysis, and blood concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Age, sex, and county-matched controls were identified from commercial/consumer databases using a targeted landline phone sample. Eligible controls were consented, surveyed, and mailed the POPs’ blood analysis consent form. Once consented, phlebotomy was scheduled. RESULTS: We mailed 3760 recruitment letters for 181 potential case-matches across 42 states between 9/2018 and 3/2020. After making phone contact and determining eligibility, 146 controls agreed to participate (response rate = 11.4%, cooperation rate = 22.8%). To date, 127 controls completed the survey and bloodwork. Though controls were matched to cases on age, sex, and county, unmatched characteristics (e.g. smoking) did not differ statistically. Interviewing and incentive costs are estimated at $211.85 per complete participation. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting matched population-based controls for comparison to cases from the Registry for a study involving completion of a detailed survey and blood specimen provision is relatively feasible and cost effective. This recruitment method could be useful for case-control studies of other rare disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9014325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90143252022-08-01 Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry BEAR, TODD M. MALEK, ANGELA M. FOULDS, ABIGAIL RAGER, JUDITH DEPERRIOR, SARAH E. VENA, JOHN E. LARSON, THEODORE C. MEHTA, PAUL HORTON, D. KEVIN TALBOTT, EVELYN O. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener Article OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) created the National ALS Registry (Registry) to examine the epidemiology of ALS and potential risk factors. We are currently recruiting population-based controls for an epidemiologic case-control study to examine ALS environmental risk factors using this Registry. To date, we have recruited 181 non-diseased, population-based controls for comparison to Registry cases (n = 280). Here we report our recruitment methods for controls and the associated response rates and costs. METHODS: Eligible ALS cases had complete risk factor survey data, DNA analysis, and blood concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Age, sex, and county-matched controls were identified from commercial/consumer databases using a targeted landline phone sample. Eligible controls were consented, surveyed, and mailed the POPs’ blood analysis consent form. Once consented, phlebotomy was scheduled. RESULTS: We mailed 3760 recruitment letters for 181 potential case-matches across 42 states between 9/2018 and 3/2020. After making phone contact and determining eligibility, 146 controls agreed to participate (response rate = 11.4%, cooperation rate = 22.8%). To date, 127 controls completed the survey and bloodwork. Though controls were matched to cases on age, sex, and county, unmatched characteristics (e.g. smoking) did not differ statistically. Interviewing and incentive costs are estimated at $211.85 per complete participation. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting matched population-based controls for comparison to cases from the Registry for a study involving completion of a detailed survey and blood specimen provision is relatively feasible and cost effective. This recruitment method could be useful for case-control studies of other rare disorders. 2021-08 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9014325/ /pubmed/33860698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2021.1887262 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iafd20 |
spellingShingle | Article BEAR, TODD M. MALEK, ANGELA M. FOULDS, ABIGAIL RAGER, JUDITH DEPERRIOR, SARAH E. VENA, JOHN E. LARSON, THEODORE C. MEHTA, PAUL HORTON, D. KEVIN TALBOTT, EVELYN O. Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry |
title | Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry |
title_full | Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry |
title_fullStr | Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry |
title_short | Recruitment of population-based controls for ALS cases from the National ALS Registry |
title_sort | recruitment of population-based controls for als cases from the national als registry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2021.1887262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beartoddm recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT malekangelam recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT fouldsabigail recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT ragerjudith recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT deperriorsarahe recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT venajohne recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT larsontheodorec recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT mehtapaul recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT hortondkevin recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry AT talbottevelyno recruitmentofpopulationbasedcontrolsforalscasesfromthenationalalsregistry |