Cargando…
Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Solicited journal entries are a qualitative research method with a fairly strong tradition in sociological research and particularly in qualitative health research. However, the practices and strengths associated with solicited journal entries have not been explored as frequently or comprehensively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/16094069221093138 |
_version_ | 1784688186301087744 |
---|---|
author | Rudrum, Sarah Casey, Rebecca Frank, Lesley Brickner, Rachel K. MacKenzie, Sami Carlson, Jesse Rondinelli, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Rudrum, Sarah Casey, Rebecca Frank, Lesley Brickner, Rachel K. MacKenzie, Sami Carlson, Jesse Rondinelli, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Rudrum, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Solicited journal entries are a qualitative research method with a fairly strong tradition in sociological research and particularly in qualitative health research. However, the practices and strengths associated with solicited journal entries have not been explored as frequently or comprehensively as more conventional qualitative research methods, such as interviews. During the COVID-19 pandemic we carried out two online studies employing solicited written journal entries and photos. One study focused on pregnancy and health care experiences during the pandemic and the other on everyday life while working from home due to public health restrictions. Here, we discuss solicited online journal entries as a qualitative method and reflect on the strengths and challenges we encountered, including those related to using the online survey tool LimeSurvey for a qualitative diary-based study. The richness of data and the ability to solicit participants’ contemporaneous reflections over the course of a set length of time, the ability to reach people across time zones and in multiple places, and the ability to adapt prompts in a quickly changing research context are major strengths of online journaling. The level of commitment required by participants, the potential for attrition, the need for literacy and technology access, and the large amount of data from each participant are potential limitations for researchers to consider. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9014354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90143542022-04-18 Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic Rudrum, Sarah Casey, Rebecca Frank, Lesley Brickner, Rachel K. MacKenzie, Sami Carlson, Jesse Rondinelli, Elisabeth Int J Qual Methods Regular Article Solicited journal entries are a qualitative research method with a fairly strong tradition in sociological research and particularly in qualitative health research. However, the practices and strengths associated with solicited journal entries have not been explored as frequently or comprehensively as more conventional qualitative research methods, such as interviews. During the COVID-19 pandemic we carried out two online studies employing solicited written journal entries and photos. One study focused on pregnancy and health care experiences during the pandemic and the other on everyday life while working from home due to public health restrictions. Here, we discuss solicited online journal entries as a qualitative method and reflect on the strengths and challenges we encountered, including those related to using the online survey tool LimeSurvey for a qualitative diary-based study. The richness of data and the ability to solicit participants’ contemporaneous reflections over the course of a set length of time, the ability to reach people across time zones and in multiple places, and the ability to adapt prompts in a quickly changing research context are major strengths of online journaling. The level of commitment required by participants, the potential for attrition, the need for literacy and technology access, and the large amount of data from each participant are potential limitations for researchers to consider. SAGE Publications 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9014354/ /pubmed/35464299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/16094069221093138 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Rudrum, Sarah Casey, Rebecca Frank, Lesley Brickner, Rachel K. MacKenzie, Sami Carlson, Jesse Rondinelli, Elisabeth Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal
Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal
Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal
Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal
Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal
Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | qualitative research studies online: using prompted weekly journal
entries during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/16094069221093138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudrumsarah qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic AT caseyrebecca qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic AT franklesley qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic AT bricknerrachelk qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic AT mackenziesami qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic AT carlsonjesse qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic AT rondinellielisabeth qualitativeresearchstudiesonlineusingpromptedweeklyjournalentriesduringthecovid19pandemic |