Cargando…

Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress

Individuals vary in how they produce speech. This variability affects both the segments (vowels and consonants) and the suprasegmental properties of their speech (prosody). Previous literature has demonstrated that listeners can adapt to variability in how different talkers pronounce the segments of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bosker, Hans Rutger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309211030307
_version_ 1784688233620176896
author Bosker, Hans Rutger
author_facet Bosker, Hans Rutger
author_sort Bosker, Hans Rutger
collection PubMed
description Individuals vary in how they produce speech. This variability affects both the segments (vowels and consonants) and the suprasegmental properties of their speech (prosody). Previous literature has demonstrated that listeners can adapt to variability in how different talkers pronounce the segments of speech. This study shows that listeners can also adapt to variability in how talkers produce lexical stress. Experiment 1 demonstrates a selective adaptation effect in lexical stress perception: repeatedly hearing Dutch trochaic words biased perception of a subsequent lexical stress continuum towards more iamb responses. Experiment 2 demonstrates a recalibration effect in lexical stress perception: when ambiguous suprasegmental cues to lexical stress were disambiguated by lexical orthographic context as signaling a trochaic word in an exposure phase, Dutch participants categorized a subsequent test continuum as more trochee-like. Moreover, the selective adaptation and recalibration effects generalized to novel words, not encountered during exposure. Together, the experiments demonstrate that listeners also flexibly adapt to variability in the suprasegmental properties of speech, thus expanding our understanding of the utility of listener adaptation in speech perception. Moreover, the combined outcomes speak for an architecture of spoken word recognition involving abstract prosodic representations at a prelexical level of analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9014674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90146742022-04-19 Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress Bosker, Hans Rutger Lang Speech Articles Individuals vary in how they produce speech. This variability affects both the segments (vowels and consonants) and the suprasegmental properties of their speech (prosody). Previous literature has demonstrated that listeners can adapt to variability in how different talkers pronounce the segments of speech. This study shows that listeners can also adapt to variability in how talkers produce lexical stress. Experiment 1 demonstrates a selective adaptation effect in lexical stress perception: repeatedly hearing Dutch trochaic words biased perception of a subsequent lexical stress continuum towards more iamb responses. Experiment 2 demonstrates a recalibration effect in lexical stress perception: when ambiguous suprasegmental cues to lexical stress were disambiguated by lexical orthographic context as signaling a trochaic word in an exposure phase, Dutch participants categorized a subsequent test continuum as more trochee-like. Moreover, the selective adaptation and recalibration effects generalized to novel words, not encountered during exposure. Together, the experiments demonstrate that listeners also flexibly adapt to variability in the suprasegmental properties of speech, thus expanding our understanding of the utility of listener adaptation in speech perception. Moreover, the combined outcomes speak for an architecture of spoken word recognition involving abstract prosodic representations at a prelexical level of analysis. SAGE Publications 2021-07-06 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9014674/ /pubmed/34227417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309211030307 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Bosker, Hans Rutger
Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress
title Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress
title_full Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress
title_fullStr Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress
title_full_unstemmed Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress
title_short Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress
title_sort evidence for selective adaptation and recalibration in the perception of lexical stress
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309211030307
work_keys_str_mv AT boskerhansrutger evidenceforselectiveadaptationandrecalibrationintheperceptionoflexicalstress