Cargando…
Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
BACKGROUND: Pilots must process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Mental workload is one of the main issues in man–machine interactive mode when dealing with multiple tasks. This study aimed to combine functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489 |
_version_ | 1784688290000011264 |
---|---|
author | Li, Wenbin Li, Rong Xie, Xiaoping Chang, Yaoming |
author_facet | Li, Wenbin Li, Rong Xie, Xiaoping Chang, Yaoming |
author_sort | Li, Wenbin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pilots must process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Mental workload is one of the main issues in man–machine interactive mode when dealing with multiple tasks. This study aimed to combine functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect changes in mental workload during multitasking in a simulated flight. METHODS: Twenty‐six participants performed three multitasking tasks at different mental workload levels. These mental workload levels were set by varying the number of subtasks. fNIRS and ECG signals were recorded during tasks. Participants filled in the national aeronautics and space administration task load index (NASA‐TLX) scale after each task. The effects of mental workload on scores of NASA‐TLX, performance of tasks, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to multitasking in lower mental workload conditions, participants exhibited higher scores of NASA‐TLX, HR, and PFC activation when multitasking in high mental workload conditions. Their performance was worse during the high mental workload multitasking condition, as evidenced by the higher average tracking distance, smaller number of response times, and longer response time of the meter. The standard deviation of the RR intervals (SDNN) was negatively correlated with subjective mental workload in the low task load condition and PFC activation was positively correlated with HR and subjective mental workload in the medium task load condition. CONCLUSION: HR and PFC activation can be used to detect changes in mental workload during simulated flight multitasking tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9014989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90149892022-04-20 Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight Li, Wenbin Li, Rong Xie, Xiaoping Chang, Yaoming Brain Behav Original Articles BACKGROUND: Pilots must process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Mental workload is one of the main issues in man–machine interactive mode when dealing with multiple tasks. This study aimed to combine functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect changes in mental workload during multitasking in a simulated flight. METHODS: Twenty‐six participants performed three multitasking tasks at different mental workload levels. These mental workload levels were set by varying the number of subtasks. fNIRS and ECG signals were recorded during tasks. Participants filled in the national aeronautics and space administration task load index (NASA‐TLX) scale after each task. The effects of mental workload on scores of NASA‐TLX, performance of tasks, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to multitasking in lower mental workload conditions, participants exhibited higher scores of NASA‐TLX, HR, and PFC activation when multitasking in high mental workload conditions. Their performance was worse during the high mental workload multitasking condition, as evidenced by the higher average tracking distance, smaller number of response times, and longer response time of the meter. The standard deviation of the RR intervals (SDNN) was negatively correlated with subjective mental workload in the low task load condition and PFC activation was positively correlated with HR and subjective mental workload in the medium task load condition. CONCLUSION: HR and PFC activation can be used to detect changes in mental workload during simulated flight multitasking tasks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9014989/ /pubmed/35290712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Li, Wenbin Li, Rong Xie, Xiaoping Chang, Yaoming Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
title | Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
title_full | Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
title_fullStr | Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
title_short | Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
title_sort | evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liwenbin evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight AT lirong evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight AT xiexiaoping evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight AT changyaoming evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight |