Cargando…
6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers
AIM: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the first group of people vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2). Characterization of the kinetics of antibody response to vaccination is important to devise future vaccination strategies. To better characterize the antibody response...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266781 |
_version_ | 1784688323028058112 |
---|---|
author | Cham, Jason Pandey, Amitabh C. New, Jacob Huynh, Tridu Hong, Lee Orendain, Natalia Topol, Eric J. Nicholson, Laura J. |
author_facet | Cham, Jason Pandey, Amitabh C. New, Jacob Huynh, Tridu Hong, Lee Orendain, Natalia Topol, Eric J. Nicholson, Laura J. |
author_sort | Cham, Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the first group of people vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2). Characterization of the kinetics of antibody response to vaccination is important to devise future vaccination strategies. To better characterize the antibody response to BNT162b2, we analyzed the kinetics of IgG and IgM antibody response to 5 different SARS-CoV-2 epitopes over a period of 6 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational single-centered study was conducted to evaluate the temporal dynamics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following immunization with two doses of BNT162b2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed using the Maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen panel (Genalyte Inc.). Healthcare workers aged ≥18 receiving BNT162b2 vaccination who self-reported no prior symptoms of COVID-19 nor prior COVID-19 PCR test positivity, were included in this study. HCWs developed an IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1, Spike S1 receptor binding domain (RBD), Spike S1S2 and Spike S2 after vaccination. IgG response was observed at two weeks following immunization in most participant samples and continued to increase at week 4, but subsequently decreased significantly starting at 3 months and up to 6 months. In contrast, IgM response to respective epitopes was minimal. CONCLUSION: Multiplex results demonstrate that, contrary to natural infection, immunization with BNT162b2 produces minimal anti-Spike IgM response. Polyclonal IgG response to Spike declined at 3 months and continued to do so up to 6 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9015132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90151322022-04-19 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers Cham, Jason Pandey, Amitabh C. New, Jacob Huynh, Tridu Hong, Lee Orendain, Natalia Topol, Eric J. Nicholson, Laura J. PLoS One Research Article AIM: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the first group of people vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2). Characterization of the kinetics of antibody response to vaccination is important to devise future vaccination strategies. To better characterize the antibody response to BNT162b2, we analyzed the kinetics of IgG and IgM antibody response to 5 different SARS-CoV-2 epitopes over a period of 6 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational single-centered study was conducted to evaluate the temporal dynamics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following immunization with two doses of BNT162b2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed using the Maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen panel (Genalyte Inc.). Healthcare workers aged ≥18 receiving BNT162b2 vaccination who self-reported no prior symptoms of COVID-19 nor prior COVID-19 PCR test positivity, were included in this study. HCWs developed an IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1, Spike S1 receptor binding domain (RBD), Spike S1S2 and Spike S2 after vaccination. IgG response was observed at two weeks following immunization in most participant samples and continued to increase at week 4, but subsequently decreased significantly starting at 3 months and up to 6 months. In contrast, IgM response to respective epitopes was minimal. CONCLUSION: Multiplex results demonstrate that, contrary to natural infection, immunization with BNT162b2 produces minimal anti-Spike IgM response. Polyclonal IgG response to Spike declined at 3 months and continued to do so up to 6 months. Public Library of Science 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9015132/ /pubmed/35436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266781 Text en © 2022 Cham et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cham, Jason Pandey, Amitabh C. New, Jacob Huynh, Tridu Hong, Lee Orendain, Natalia Topol, Eric J. Nicholson, Laura J. 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
title | 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
title_full | 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
title_fullStr | 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
title_full_unstemmed | 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
title_short | 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
title_sort | 6 month serologic response to the pfizer-biontech covid-19 vaccine among healthcare workers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chamjason 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT pandeyamitabhc 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT newjacob 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT huynhtridu 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT honglee 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT orendainnatalia 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT topolericj 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers AT nicholsonlauraj 6monthserologicresponsetothepfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineamonghealthcareworkers |