Cargando…

Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher‐dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic‐dose and intermediate‐dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID‐19. This meta‐analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jorda, Anselm, Siller‐Matula, Jolanta M., Zeitlinger, Markus, Jilma, Bernd, Gelbenegger, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2504
_version_ 1784688351234752512
author Jorda, Anselm
Siller‐Matula, Jolanta M.
Zeitlinger, Markus
Jilma, Bernd
Gelbenegger, Georg
author_facet Jorda, Anselm
Siller‐Matula, Jolanta M.
Zeitlinger, Markus
Jilma, Bernd
Gelbenegger, Georg
author_sort Jorda, Anselm
collection PubMed
description Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher‐dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic‐dose and intermediate‐dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID‐19. This meta‐analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of higher‐dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID‐19. Ten randomized controlled open‐label trials with a total of 5,753 patients were included. The risk of death and net adverse clinical events (including death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding) were similar between higher‐dose and prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% CI, 0.79–1.16, P = 0.66 and RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73–1.03, P = 0.11, respectively). Higher‐dose anticoagulation, compared with prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation, decreased the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.47–0.84, P = 0.002) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.19–2.62, P = 0.005). The risk of death showed no statistically significant difference between higher‐dose anticoagulation and prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50–1.52, P = 0.62) and in critically ill patients with COVID‐19 (RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.93–1.17, P = 0.5). The risk of death was similar between therapeutic‐dose vs. prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69–1.21, P = 0.54) and between intermediate‐dose vs. prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63–1.61, P = 0.98). In patients with markedly increased d‐dimer levels, higher‐dose anticoagulation was also not associated with a decreased risk of death as compared with prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64–1.16, P = 0.34). Without any clear evidence of survival benefit, these findings do not support the routine use of therapeutic‐dose or intermediate‐dose anticoagulation in critically or noncritically ill patients with COVID‐19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9015466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90154662022-04-19 Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis Jorda, Anselm Siller‐Matula, Jolanta M. Zeitlinger, Markus Jilma, Bernd Gelbenegger, Georg Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher‐dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic‐dose and intermediate‐dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID‐19. This meta‐analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of higher‐dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID‐19. Ten randomized controlled open‐label trials with a total of 5,753 patients were included. The risk of death and net adverse clinical events (including death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding) were similar between higher‐dose and prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% CI, 0.79–1.16, P = 0.66 and RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73–1.03, P = 0.11, respectively). Higher‐dose anticoagulation, compared with prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation, decreased the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.47–0.84, P = 0.002) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.19–2.62, P = 0.005). The risk of death showed no statistically significant difference between higher‐dose anticoagulation and prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50–1.52, P = 0.62) and in critically ill patients with COVID‐19 (RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.93–1.17, P = 0.5). The risk of death was similar between therapeutic‐dose vs. prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69–1.21, P = 0.54) and between intermediate‐dose vs. prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63–1.61, P = 0.98). In patients with markedly increased d‐dimer levels, higher‐dose anticoagulation was also not associated with a decreased risk of death as compared with prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64–1.16, P = 0.34). Without any clear evidence of survival benefit, these findings do not support the routine use of therapeutic‐dose or intermediate‐dose anticoagulation in critically or noncritically ill patients with COVID‐19. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-19 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9015466/ /pubmed/34862791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2504 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jorda, Anselm
Siller‐Matula, Jolanta M.
Zeitlinger, Markus
Jilma, Bernd
Gelbenegger, Georg
Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis
title Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis
title_full Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis
title_short Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid‐19: A Meta‐Analysis
title_sort anticoagulant treatment regimens in patients with covid‐19: a meta‐analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2504
work_keys_str_mv AT jordaanselm anticoagulanttreatmentregimensinpatientswithcovid19ametaanalysis
AT sillermatulajolantam anticoagulanttreatmentregimensinpatientswithcovid19ametaanalysis
AT zeitlingermarkus anticoagulanttreatmentregimensinpatientswithcovid19ametaanalysis
AT jilmabernd anticoagulanttreatmentregimensinpatientswithcovid19ametaanalysis
AT gelbeneggergeorg anticoagulanttreatmentregimensinpatientswithcovid19ametaanalysis