Cargando…
Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial
BACKGROUND: We previously reported the efficacy of the adjuvanted-protein COVID-19 vaccine candidate S-Trimer (SCB-2019) in adults who showed no evidence of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent of protection afforded by previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00144-X |
_version_ | 1784688357583880192 |
---|---|
author | Smolenov, Igor Han, Htay Htay Li, Ping Baccarini, Carmen Verhoeven, Carole Rockhold, Frank Clemens, Sue Ann Costa Ambrosino, Donna Richmond, Peter Siber, George Liang, Joshua Clemens, Ralf |
author_facet | Smolenov, Igor Han, Htay Htay Li, Ping Baccarini, Carmen Verhoeven, Carole Rockhold, Frank Clemens, Sue Ann Costa Ambrosino, Donna Richmond, Peter Siber, George Liang, Joshua Clemens, Ralf |
author_sort | Smolenov, Igor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We previously reported the efficacy of the adjuvanted-protein COVID-19 vaccine candidate S-Trimer (SCB-2019) in adults who showed no evidence of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent of protection afforded by previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on subsequent COVID-19 infection, as well as the efficacy, safety, and reactogenicity of SCB-2019 in participants who were enrolled in the Study evaluating Protective-Efficacy and safety of Clover's Trimeric Recombinant protein-based and Adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine (SPECTRA) trial who had already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination. METHODS: In a phase 2 and 3 multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (SPECTRA) done at 31 sites in five countries, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using the Cenduit Interactive Response Technology system (IQVIA, Durham, NC, USA), with a block size of six, to receive two doses of either SCB-2019 or placebo 21 days apart. The primary outcomes of the SPECTRA trial were vaccine efficacy, measured by real-time PCR (rtPCR)-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity, with onset from 14 days after the second vaccine dose, as well as the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. Here, we present secondary analyses to calculate the protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 against reinfection with COVID-19 according to severity in SPECTRA participants who had evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, including efficacy against identified viral variants, as well as efficacy of SCB-2019 vaccination in this population. FINDINGS: We enrolled 30 174 participants between March 24, 2021, and Aug 10, 2021. In the 14 670 participants who were randomly assigned to receive placebo, there were 418 (2·8%) confirmed cases of COVID-19; 65 (0·9%) of 7339 SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, and 353 (4·8%) of 7331 SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (attack rates of 5·5 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants and 32·4 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-naive participants). Protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was 83·2% (95% CI 78·0–87·3) against any COVID-19, 92·5% (82·9–97·3) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (59·3–100) against severe COVID-19; no SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants had hospitalisation associated with COVID-19. Protective efficacy against variants were 100% for alpha (B.1.1.7) and lambda (C.37) variants, 88·6% (14·9–99·7) for B.1.623, 93·6% (80·1–98·7) for gamma (P.1), and 92·4% (81·2–97·6) for mu (B.1.621) variants, and lowest against beta (B.1.351; 72·2% [33·1–89·9]) and delta (B.1.617.2; 77·2% [61·3–87·2]) variants. In addition, one dose of SCB-2019 had 49·9% (1·5–75·6) efficacy against any symptomatic COVID-19, and two doses had 64·2% (26·5–83·8) efficacy. SCB-2019 was well tolerated in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, but was associated with higher rates of injection site pain (89 [33·8%] of 263 participants) than placebo (16 [6·7%] of 239 participants). Rates of solicited systemic adverse events, severe adverse events, and serious adverse events were similar between vaccine and placebo groups, and with rates in SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccine recipients. INTERPRETATION: Previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 decreased the risk and severity of subsequent COVID-19 infection, even against newly emerging variants. Protection is further enhanced by one or two doses of SCB-2019. FUNDING: Clover Biopharmaceuticals, The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9015644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90156442022-04-19 Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial Smolenov, Igor Han, Htay Htay Li, Ping Baccarini, Carmen Verhoeven, Carole Rockhold, Frank Clemens, Sue Ann Costa Ambrosino, Donna Richmond, Peter Siber, George Liang, Joshua Clemens, Ralf Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: We previously reported the efficacy of the adjuvanted-protein COVID-19 vaccine candidate S-Trimer (SCB-2019) in adults who showed no evidence of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent of protection afforded by previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on subsequent COVID-19 infection, as well as the efficacy, safety, and reactogenicity of SCB-2019 in participants who were enrolled in the Study evaluating Protective-Efficacy and safety of Clover's Trimeric Recombinant protein-based and Adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine (SPECTRA) trial who had already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination. METHODS: In a phase 2 and 3 multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (SPECTRA) done at 31 sites in five countries, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using the Cenduit Interactive Response Technology system (IQVIA, Durham, NC, USA), with a block size of six, to receive two doses of either SCB-2019 or placebo 21 days apart. The primary outcomes of the SPECTRA trial were vaccine efficacy, measured by real-time PCR (rtPCR)-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity, with onset from 14 days after the second vaccine dose, as well as the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. Here, we present secondary analyses to calculate the protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 against reinfection with COVID-19 according to severity in SPECTRA participants who had evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, including efficacy against identified viral variants, as well as efficacy of SCB-2019 vaccination in this population. FINDINGS: We enrolled 30 174 participants between March 24, 2021, and Aug 10, 2021. In the 14 670 participants who were randomly assigned to receive placebo, there were 418 (2·8%) confirmed cases of COVID-19; 65 (0·9%) of 7339 SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, and 353 (4·8%) of 7331 SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (attack rates of 5·5 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants and 32·4 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-naive participants). Protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was 83·2% (95% CI 78·0–87·3) against any COVID-19, 92·5% (82·9–97·3) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (59·3–100) against severe COVID-19; no SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants had hospitalisation associated with COVID-19. Protective efficacy against variants were 100% for alpha (B.1.1.7) and lambda (C.37) variants, 88·6% (14·9–99·7) for B.1.623, 93·6% (80·1–98·7) for gamma (P.1), and 92·4% (81·2–97·6) for mu (B.1.621) variants, and lowest against beta (B.1.351; 72·2% [33·1–89·9]) and delta (B.1.617.2; 77·2% [61·3–87·2]) variants. In addition, one dose of SCB-2019 had 49·9% (1·5–75·6) efficacy against any symptomatic COVID-19, and two doses had 64·2% (26·5–83·8) efficacy. SCB-2019 was well tolerated in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, but was associated with higher rates of injection site pain (89 [33·8%] of 263 participants) than placebo (16 [6·7%] of 239 participants). Rates of solicited systemic adverse events, severe adverse events, and serious adverse events were similar between vaccine and placebo groups, and with rates in SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccine recipients. INTERPRETATION: Previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 decreased the risk and severity of subsequent COVID-19 infection, even against newly emerging variants. Protection is further enhanced by one or two doses of SCB-2019. FUNDING: Clover Biopharmaceuticals, The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). Elsevier Ltd. 2022-07 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9015644/ /pubmed/35447085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00144-X Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Smolenov, Igor Han, Htay Htay Li, Ping Baccarini, Carmen Verhoeven, Carole Rockhold, Frank Clemens, Sue Ann Costa Ambrosino, Donna Richmond, Peter Siber, George Liang, Joshua Clemens, Ralf Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
title | Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
title_full | Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
title_short | Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
title_sort | impact of previous exposure to sars-cov-2 and of s-trimer (scb-2019) covid-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00144-X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smolenovigor impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT hanhtayhtay impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT liping impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT baccarinicarmen impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT verhoevencarole impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT rockholdfrank impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT clemenssueanncosta impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT ambrosinodonna impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT richmondpeter impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT sibergeorge impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT liangjoshua impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT clemensralf impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial AT impactofpreviousexposuretosarscov2andofstrimerscb2019covid19vaccinationontheriskofreinfectionarandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledphase2and3trial |