Cargando…
Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
PURPOSE: In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9119245 |
_version_ | 1784688399470297088 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Li, Yongheng Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Wang, Hongzhi Cai, Yong Wang, Weihu |
author_facet | Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Li, Yongheng Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Wang, Hongzhi Cai, Yong Wang, Weihu |
author_sort | Shi, Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: We retrospectively screened patients with LARC from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients that received hyperfractionated IMRT or conventional fractionated IMRT were eligible in the hyperfractionation (HF) group or conventional fractionation (CF) group, respectively. The primary outcome was the complete response rate. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, postoperative complications, anus-reservation operation rate, local recurrence and distant metastases rate, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: 335 patients were included in the analysis. The complete response rate for the hyperfractionated and conventional fractionated IMRT was 20.41% vs. 23.47% (P = 0.583). The anus-reservation operation rate was 68.37% vs. 65.31% (P = 0.649). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity during radiotherapy; the rate of grade 3 toxicity and postoperative complications was both comparable between groups. However, in the CF group, more patients had a second operation due to complications (0.0% vs. 5.68%, P = 0.011). The cumulative local regional recurrence and distant metastases rates of the HF group and CF group were 5.10% vs. 9.18% (P = 0.267) and 22.45% vs. 24.49% (P = 0.736), respectively. The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS in the HF group and CF group were 86.45% vs. 73.30% (P = 0.503), 87.34% vs. 75.23% (P = 0.634), and 70.80% vs. 68.11% (P = 0.891), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative hyperfractionated IMRT with oral capecitabine, with an acceptable toxicity and favorable response and survival, could reduce the rate of secondary surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9015848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90158482022-04-19 Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Li, Yongheng Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Wang, Hongzhi Cai, Yong Wang, Weihu J Oncol Research Article PURPOSE: In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: We retrospectively screened patients with LARC from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients that received hyperfractionated IMRT or conventional fractionated IMRT were eligible in the hyperfractionation (HF) group or conventional fractionation (CF) group, respectively. The primary outcome was the complete response rate. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, postoperative complications, anus-reservation operation rate, local recurrence and distant metastases rate, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: 335 patients were included in the analysis. The complete response rate for the hyperfractionated and conventional fractionated IMRT was 20.41% vs. 23.47% (P = 0.583). The anus-reservation operation rate was 68.37% vs. 65.31% (P = 0.649). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity during radiotherapy; the rate of grade 3 toxicity and postoperative complications was both comparable between groups. However, in the CF group, more patients had a second operation due to complications (0.0% vs. 5.68%, P = 0.011). The cumulative local regional recurrence and distant metastases rates of the HF group and CF group were 5.10% vs. 9.18% (P = 0.267) and 22.45% vs. 24.49% (P = 0.736), respectively. The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS in the HF group and CF group were 86.45% vs. 73.30% (P = 0.503), 87.34% vs. 75.23% (P = 0.634), and 70.80% vs. 68.11% (P = 0.891), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative hyperfractionated IMRT with oral capecitabine, with an acceptable toxicity and favorable response and survival, could reduce the rate of secondary surgery. Hindawi 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9015848/ /pubmed/35444702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9119245 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Li, Yongheng Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Wang, Hongzhi Cai, Yong Wang, Weihu Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
title | Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
title_full | Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
title_fullStr | Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
title_short | Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
title_sort | hyperfractionation versus conventional fractionation of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9119245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shichen hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhangyangzi hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT liyongheng hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT gengjianhao hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhuxianggao hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wanghongzhi hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT caiyong hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangweihu hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy |