Cargando…

Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

PURPOSE: In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Chen, Zhang, Yangzi, Li, Yongheng, Geng, Jianhao, Zhu, Xianggao, Wang, Hongzhi, Cai, Yong, Wang, Weihu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9119245
_version_ 1784688399470297088
author Shi, Chen
Zhang, Yangzi
Li, Yongheng
Geng, Jianhao
Zhu, Xianggao
Wang, Hongzhi
Cai, Yong
Wang, Weihu
author_facet Shi, Chen
Zhang, Yangzi
Li, Yongheng
Geng, Jianhao
Zhu, Xianggao
Wang, Hongzhi
Cai, Yong
Wang, Weihu
author_sort Shi, Chen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: We retrospectively screened patients with LARC from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients that received hyperfractionated IMRT or conventional fractionated IMRT were eligible in the hyperfractionation (HF) group or conventional fractionation (CF) group, respectively. The primary outcome was the complete response rate. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, postoperative complications, anus-reservation operation rate, local recurrence and distant metastases rate, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: 335 patients were included in the analysis. The complete response rate for the hyperfractionated and conventional fractionated IMRT was 20.41% vs. 23.47% (P = 0.583). The anus-reservation operation rate was 68.37% vs. 65.31% (P = 0.649). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity during radiotherapy; the rate of grade 3 toxicity and postoperative complications was both comparable between groups. However, in the CF group, more patients had a second operation due to complications (0.0% vs. 5.68%, P = 0.011). The cumulative local regional recurrence and distant metastases rates of the HF group and CF group were 5.10% vs. 9.18% (P = 0.267) and 22.45% vs. 24.49% (P = 0.736), respectively. The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS in the HF group and CF group were 86.45% vs. 73.30% (P = 0.503), 87.34% vs. 75.23% (P = 0.634), and 70.80% vs. 68.11% (P = 0.891), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative hyperfractionated IMRT with oral capecitabine, with an acceptable toxicity and favorable response and survival, could reduce the rate of secondary surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9015848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90158482022-04-19 Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Li, Yongheng Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Wang, Hongzhi Cai, Yong Wang, Weihu J Oncol Research Article PURPOSE: In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: We retrospectively screened patients with LARC from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients that received hyperfractionated IMRT or conventional fractionated IMRT were eligible in the hyperfractionation (HF) group or conventional fractionation (CF) group, respectively. The primary outcome was the complete response rate. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, postoperative complications, anus-reservation operation rate, local recurrence and distant metastases rate, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: 335 patients were included in the analysis. The complete response rate for the hyperfractionated and conventional fractionated IMRT was 20.41% vs. 23.47% (P = 0.583). The anus-reservation operation rate was 68.37% vs. 65.31% (P = 0.649). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity during radiotherapy; the rate of grade 3 toxicity and postoperative complications was both comparable between groups. However, in the CF group, more patients had a second operation due to complications (0.0% vs. 5.68%, P = 0.011). The cumulative local regional recurrence and distant metastases rates of the HF group and CF group were 5.10% vs. 9.18% (P = 0.267) and 22.45% vs. 24.49% (P = 0.736), respectively. The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS in the HF group and CF group were 86.45% vs. 73.30% (P = 0.503), 87.34% vs. 75.23% (P = 0.634), and 70.80% vs. 68.11% (P = 0.891), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative hyperfractionated IMRT with oral capecitabine, with an acceptable toxicity and favorable response and survival, could reduce the rate of secondary surgery. Hindawi 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9015848/ /pubmed/35444702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9119245 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shi, Chen
Zhang, Yangzi
Li, Yongheng
Geng, Jianhao
Zhu, Xianggao
Wang, Hongzhi
Cai, Yong
Wang, Weihu
Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_full Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_fullStr Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_full_unstemmed Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_short Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_sort hyperfractionation versus conventional fractionation of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9119245
work_keys_str_mv AT shichen hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhangyangzi hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT liyongheng hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT gengjianhao hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhuxianggao hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wanghongzhi hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT caiyong hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wangweihu hyperfractionationversusconventionalfractionationofpreoperativeintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithoralcapecitabineinlocallyadvancedmidlowrectalcancerapropensityscorematchingstudy