Cargando…

New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application

This study compared the time required to produce nine-directional ocular photographs using the conventional method to that using the newly devised 9Gaze application. In total, 20 healthy adults, 10 adult patients with strabismus, and 10 pediatric patients with amblyopia or strabismus had their ocula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goseki, Toshiaki, Kunimi, Keiko, Shioya, Naoko, Iijima, Yuka, Sebe, Manami, Hosoya, Karin, Fukaya, Kyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444735
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.1.5
_version_ 1784688404034748416
author Goseki, Toshiaki
Kunimi, Keiko
Shioya, Naoko
Iijima, Yuka
Sebe, Manami
Hosoya, Karin
Fukaya, Kyo
author_facet Goseki, Toshiaki
Kunimi, Keiko
Shioya, Naoko
Iijima, Yuka
Sebe, Manami
Hosoya, Karin
Fukaya, Kyo
author_sort Goseki, Toshiaki
collection PubMed
description This study compared the time required to produce nine-directional ocular photographs using the conventional method to that using the newly devised 9Gaze application. In total, 20 healthy adults, 10 adult patients with strabismus, and 10 pediatric patients with amblyopia or strabismus had their ocular photographs taken using a digital camera with PowerPoint 2010, and with an iPad, and iPod touch with 9Gaze. Photographs of 10 healthy patients were taken by orthoptists with <1 year of experience, and the other participants had theirs taken by those with >1 year of experience. The required time was compared between the three devices in all patients and the two orthoptist groups in 20 healthy adults (>1 year and <1 year of experience). The required times were significantly different between the devices: 515.5 ± 187.0 sec with the digital camera, 117.4 ± 17.8 sec with the iPad, and 76.3 ± 14.1 sec with the iPod touch. The required time with the digital camera was significantly different between the two orthoptist groups (404.7 ± 150.8 vs. 626.3 ± 154.2 sec, P=0.007). The use of the 9Gaze application shortened the recording time required. Furthermore, 9Gaze can be used without considering the years of experience of the examiner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9015868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90158682022-04-19 New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application Goseki, Toshiaki Kunimi, Keiko Shioya, Naoko Iijima, Yuka Sebe, Manami Hosoya, Karin Fukaya, Kyo J Eye Mov Res Research Article This study compared the time required to produce nine-directional ocular photographs using the conventional method to that using the newly devised 9Gaze application. In total, 20 healthy adults, 10 adult patients with strabismus, and 10 pediatric patients with amblyopia or strabismus had their ocular photographs taken using a digital camera with PowerPoint 2010, and with an iPad, and iPod touch with 9Gaze. Photographs of 10 healthy patients were taken by orthoptists with <1 year of experience, and the other participants had theirs taken by those with >1 year of experience. The required time was compared between the three devices in all patients and the two orthoptist groups in 20 healthy adults (>1 year and <1 year of experience). The required times were significantly different between the devices: 515.5 ± 187.0 sec with the digital camera, 117.4 ± 17.8 sec with the iPad, and 76.3 ± 14.1 sec with the iPod touch. The required time with the digital camera was significantly different between the two orthoptist groups (404.7 ± 150.8 vs. 626.3 ± 154.2 sec, P=0.007). The use of the 9Gaze application shortened the recording time required. Furthermore, 9Gaze can be used without considering the years of experience of the examiner. Bern Open Publishing 2022-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9015868/ /pubmed/35444735 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.1.5 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goseki, Toshiaki
Kunimi, Keiko
Shioya, Naoko
Iijima, Yuka
Sebe, Manami
Hosoya, Karin
Fukaya, Kyo
New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application
title New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application
title_full New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application
title_fullStr New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application
title_full_unstemmed New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application
title_short New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application
title_sort new device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9gaze” application
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444735
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.1.5
work_keys_str_mv AT gosekitoshiaki newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication
AT kunimikeiko newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication
AT shioyanaoko newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication
AT iijimayuka newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication
AT sebemanami newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication
AT hosoyakarin newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication
AT fukayakyo newdevicefortakingninedirectionalocularphotographs9gazeapplication