Cargando…

Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Sedation anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is known to decrease patient pain and anxiety, but little is known whether it affects the procedure’s prostate cancer detection and complication rates. This study aimed to determine the effect of sedation ane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hee Youn, Choi, Young Hyo, Lee, Seung-Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e115
_version_ 1784688410426867712
author Kim, Hee Youn
Choi, Young Hyo
Lee, Seung-Ju
author_facet Kim, Hee Youn
Choi, Young Hyo
Lee, Seung-Ju
author_sort Kim, Hee Youn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sedation anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is known to decrease patient pain and anxiety, but little is known whether it affects the procedure’s prostate cancer detection and complication rates. This study aimed to determine the effect of sedation anesthesia with intravenous (IV) propofol on TRUS-guided prostate biopsy outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2,119 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between November 2009 and February 2019 was undertaken. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who underwent sedation anesthesia with IV propofol and patients who underwent local anesthesia with intrarectal lidocaine gel instillation. Cancer detection and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of sedation anesthesia with IV propofol on prostate cancer detection and complication rates. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate of patients in the sedation group was 34.0%, whereas it was 29.2% in the local group (P = 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression analysis regarding factors associated with cancer detection rate after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 showed that IV propofol usage, age, PSA density and core length were significant factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis regarding factors associated with complications (voiding dysfunction, bleeding and infection) showed that IV propofol usage, age and prostate size were significant factors for voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Sedation anesthesia with IV propofol during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy was associated with a higher cancer detection rate than local anesthesia with intrarectal lidocaine gel instillation. Cancer detection rate could be an important factor to consider when selecting for the optimal anesthesia for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9015899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90158992022-04-26 Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes Kim, Hee Youn Choi, Young Hyo Lee, Seung-Ju J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Sedation anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is known to decrease patient pain and anxiety, but little is known whether it affects the procedure’s prostate cancer detection and complication rates. This study aimed to determine the effect of sedation anesthesia with intravenous (IV) propofol on TRUS-guided prostate biopsy outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2,119 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between November 2009 and February 2019 was undertaken. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who underwent sedation anesthesia with IV propofol and patients who underwent local anesthesia with intrarectal lidocaine gel instillation. Cancer detection and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of sedation anesthesia with IV propofol on prostate cancer detection and complication rates. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate of patients in the sedation group was 34.0%, whereas it was 29.2% in the local group (P = 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression analysis regarding factors associated with cancer detection rate after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 showed that IV propofol usage, age, PSA density and core length were significant factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis regarding factors associated with complications (voiding dysfunction, bleeding and infection) showed that IV propofol usage, age and prostate size were significant factors for voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Sedation anesthesia with IV propofol during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy was associated with a higher cancer detection rate than local anesthesia with intrarectal lidocaine gel instillation. Cancer detection rate could be an important factor to consider when selecting for the optimal anesthesia for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9015899/ /pubmed/35437964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e115 Text en © 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hee Youn
Choi, Young Hyo
Lee, Seung-Ju
Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
title Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
title_full Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
title_fullStr Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
title_short Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes
title_sort effect of sedation anesthesia with intravenous propofol on transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e115
work_keys_str_mv AT kimheeyoun effectofsedationanesthesiawithintravenouspropofolontransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyoutcomes
AT choiyounghyo effectofsedationanesthesiawithintravenouspropofolontransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyoutcomes
AT leeseungju effectofsedationanesthesiawithintravenouspropofolontransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyoutcomes