Cargando…

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses

INTRODUCTION: At our institution, palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is performed by the cytopathology service on an outpatient basis at the request of otolaryngologist surgeons. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of COVID lockdown measures on our FNA service with specific focu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabe, Kimmie, Chauhan, Aastha, Holler, Jana, Mettler, Tetyana, Amin, Khalid, Stewart, Jimmie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2022.04.002
_version_ 1784688422511706112
author Rabe, Kimmie
Chauhan, Aastha
Holler, Jana
Mettler, Tetyana
Amin, Khalid
Stewart, Jimmie
author_facet Rabe, Kimmie
Chauhan, Aastha
Holler, Jana
Mettler, Tetyana
Amin, Khalid
Stewart, Jimmie
author_sort Rabe, Kimmie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: At our institution, palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is performed by the cytopathology service on an outpatient basis at the request of otolaryngologist surgeons. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of COVID lockdown measures on our FNA service with specific focus on adequacy rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All palpation-guided FNA performed in 2019 to 2020 were identified in our pathology database. Adequacy rates were compared for 3 time periods in 2020: pre-COVID, lockdown, and post-lockdown. RESULTS: In 2019, 121 FNAs were performed with 98% (119 of 121) obtained by pathology and only 2% (2 of 121) obtained by surgeons. In 2020, 89 FNAs were performed with 45% (40 of 89) collected by pathologists and 55% (49 of 89) by surgeons. During the pre-COVID period of 2020, 27 FNAs were collected, 85% (23 of 27) by pathologists, 8.7% of these (2 of 23) were nondiagnostic. Of the 4 FNAs performed by surgeons, all were positive for malignancy. During COVID lockdown all 24 FNAs were performed by surgeons with a 50% (12 of 24) nondiagnostic rate. Post-lockdown, with FNA referrals still below pre-COVID levels, surgeons performed 55.3% (21 of 38) of FNAs with 28.6% (6 of 21) non-diagnostic, while pathology performed 44.7% (17 of 38) with an 11.8% (2 of 17) nondiagnostic rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our FNA service noted significant changes in 2020 as a result of the COVID pandemic. Nondiagnostic rates were significantly increased in 2020 compared with 2019, primarily due to a shift to majority surgeon-performed palpation-guided FNA in the absence of cytopathology service during the lockdown period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9015948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90159482022-04-19 Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses Rabe, Kimmie Chauhan, Aastha Holler, Jana Mettler, Tetyana Amin, Khalid Stewart, Jimmie J Am Soc Cytopathol Article INTRODUCTION: At our institution, palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is performed by the cytopathology service on an outpatient basis at the request of otolaryngologist surgeons. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of COVID lockdown measures on our FNA service with specific focus on adequacy rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All palpation-guided FNA performed in 2019 to 2020 were identified in our pathology database. Adequacy rates were compared for 3 time periods in 2020: pre-COVID, lockdown, and post-lockdown. RESULTS: In 2019, 121 FNAs were performed with 98% (119 of 121) obtained by pathology and only 2% (2 of 121) obtained by surgeons. In 2020, 89 FNAs were performed with 45% (40 of 89) collected by pathologists and 55% (49 of 89) by surgeons. During the pre-COVID period of 2020, 27 FNAs were collected, 85% (23 of 27) by pathologists, 8.7% of these (2 of 23) were nondiagnostic. Of the 4 FNAs performed by surgeons, all were positive for malignancy. During COVID lockdown all 24 FNAs were performed by surgeons with a 50% (12 of 24) nondiagnostic rate. Post-lockdown, with FNA referrals still below pre-COVID levels, surgeons performed 55.3% (21 of 38) of FNAs with 28.6% (6 of 21) non-diagnostic, while pathology performed 44.7% (17 of 38) with an 11.8% (2 of 17) nondiagnostic rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our FNA service noted significant changes in 2020 as a result of the COVID pandemic. Nondiagnostic rates were significantly increased in 2020 compared with 2019, primarily due to a shift to majority surgeon-performed palpation-guided FNA in the absence of cytopathology service during the lockdown period. American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9015948/ /pubmed/35610100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2022.04.002 Text en © 2022 American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Rabe, Kimmie
Chauhan, Aastha
Holler, Jana
Mettler, Tetyana
Amin, Khalid
Stewart, Jimmie
Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
title Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
title_full Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
title_fullStr Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
title_full_unstemmed Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
title_short Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
title_sort effects of covid-19 pandemic on cytology: specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspiration of palpable head and neck masses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2022.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT rabekimmie effectsofcovid19pandemiconcytologyspecimenadequacyinfineneedleaspirationofpalpableheadandneckmasses
AT chauhanaastha effectsofcovid19pandemiconcytologyspecimenadequacyinfineneedleaspirationofpalpableheadandneckmasses
AT hollerjana effectsofcovid19pandemiconcytologyspecimenadequacyinfineneedleaspirationofpalpableheadandneckmasses
AT mettlertetyana effectsofcovid19pandemiconcytologyspecimenadequacyinfineneedleaspirationofpalpableheadandneckmasses
AT aminkhalid effectsofcovid19pandemiconcytologyspecimenadequacyinfineneedleaspirationofpalpableheadandneckmasses
AT stewartjimmie effectsofcovid19pandemiconcytologyspecimenadequacyinfineneedleaspirationofpalpableheadandneckmasses