Cargando…

Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data

PURPOSE: Area-based socioeconomic deprivation has been established as an important indicator of health and a potential predictor of survival. In this study, we aimed to measure the effect of socioeconomic inequality on endometrial cancer survival. METHODS: Population-based data on patients diagnosed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bedir, Ahmed, Abera, Semaw Ferede, Vordermark, Dirk, Medenwald, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9015991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03908-9
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Area-based socioeconomic deprivation has been established as an important indicator of health and a potential predictor of survival. In this study, we aimed to measure the effect of socioeconomic inequality on endometrial cancer survival. METHODS: Population-based data on patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014 were obtained from the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. We investigated the association of deprivation and overall survival through Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional regression models. RESULTS: A total of 21,602 women, with a mean age of 67.8 years, were included in our analysis. The observed 5-year overall survival time for endometrial cancer patients living in the most affluent districts (first quintile) was 78.6%. The overall survival rate decreased as the level of deprivation increased (77.2%, 73.9%, 76.1%, 74.7%, for patients in the second, third, fourth, and fifth quintile (most deprived patients), respectively). Cox regression models showed stage I patients living in the most deprived districts to have a higher hazard of overall mortality when compared to the cases living in the most affluent districts [Hazard ratio: 1.20; 95% Confidence interval (0.99–1.47)] after adjusting for age, tumor characteristics, and treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate differences in endometrial cancer survival according to socioeconomic deprivation among stage I patients. Considering data limitations, future studies with access to individual-level patient information should be conducted to examine the underlying causes for the observed disparity in cancer survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03908-9.