Cargando…

A Peer-to-Peer Suicide Prevention Workshop for Medical Students

INTRODUCTION: An estimated 11% of medical students experience suicidal ideation during medical school. Many medical schools teach students how to intervene on behalf of patients experiencing suicidal ideation, but no curriculum in MedEdPORTAL teaches students how to intervene on behalf of peers. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjelvik, Alyssa, Eldridge, Alyssa, Furnari, Megan, Hoeflich, Hannah, Chen, Jason I., Roth, Brandon, Black, Whitney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35518385
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11241
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: An estimated 11% of medical students experience suicidal ideation during medical school. Many medical schools teach students how to intervene on behalf of patients experiencing suicidal ideation, but no curriculum in MedEdPORTAL teaches students how to intervene on behalf of peers. METHODS: The authors designed, implemented, and evaluated a 2-hour workshop to equip medical students with skills and resources to intervene on behalf of a peer in crisis. This workshop comprised a peer-led didactic session and small-group sessions with role-plays and a guided debrief. The resource included a slide deck for the didactic session, a facilitator guide for the small-group session, a student handout with role-plays and self-evaluation questions, and the pre-/postsurvey. RESULTS: This workshop was conducted with cohorts of first- and second-year medical students (n = 273) in October and November 2019. Pre-/postsurveys showed the greatest improvements in suicide prevention knowledge (self-rated) and the confidence in and likelihood of asking peers about suicide. DISCUSSION: Student feedback indicated that the most valuable parts of the workshop were the peer-led nature of the didactic session, the perspective of a peer's lived experience, and the role-plays. Opportunities for improvement included the scheduling of the session, the potentially triggering nature of the role-play exercises, and the importance of enabling students to opt out discreetly. A version of this workshop is now a permanent part of the first-year curriculum at our institution.