Cargando…

Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Lizhen, Li, Wei, Chen, Yixin, Lin, Yijia, Wang, Beiyun, Guo, Qihao, Miao, Ya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864
_version_ 1784688493199360000
author Cheng, Lizhen
Li, Wei
Chen, Yixin
Lin, Yijia
Wang, Beiyun
Guo, Qihao
Miao, Ya
author_facet Cheng, Lizhen
Li, Wei
Chen, Yixin
Lin, Yijia
Wang, Beiyun
Guo, Qihao
Miao, Ya
author_sort Cheng, Lizhen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to statistically validate whether plasma Aβ could predict Aβ-PET status via meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched for eligible studies from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, which reported plasma Aβ levels of amyloid-β positron emission tomography-positive (PET (+)) and amyloid-β positron emission tomography-negative (PET (−)) subjects. We generated pooled estimates using random effects meta-analyses. For any study that has significant heterogeneity, metaregression and subgroup analysis were further conducted. Publication bias was appraised by funnel plots and Egger’s test. RESULTS: 16 studies with 3047 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Among all the enrolled studies, 10 studies reported plasma Aβ40 values, while 9 studies reported plasma Aβ42 values and 13 studies reported Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) was 0.76 (95% CI −0.61 to 2.14, p=0.28) in the plasma Aβ40 values group. Plasma Aβ42 values group has a pooled SMD of −0.60 (95% CI −0.80 to −0.41, p<0.0001). In the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio group, the pooled SMD was −1.44 (95% CI −2.17 to −0.72, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Plasma Aβ40 values might not distinguish between PET (+) and PET (−) people. However, plasma Aβ42 values and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be served as independent biomarkers for predicting Aβ-PET status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9016262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90162622022-05-04 Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis Cheng, Lizhen Li, Wei Chen, Yixin Lin, Yijia Wang, Beiyun Guo, Qihao Miao, Ya J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neurodegeneration OBJECTIVE: Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to statistically validate whether plasma Aβ could predict Aβ-PET status via meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched for eligible studies from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, which reported plasma Aβ levels of amyloid-β positron emission tomography-positive (PET (+)) and amyloid-β positron emission tomography-negative (PET (−)) subjects. We generated pooled estimates using random effects meta-analyses. For any study that has significant heterogeneity, metaregression and subgroup analysis were further conducted. Publication bias was appraised by funnel plots and Egger’s test. RESULTS: 16 studies with 3047 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Among all the enrolled studies, 10 studies reported plasma Aβ40 values, while 9 studies reported plasma Aβ42 values and 13 studies reported Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) was 0.76 (95% CI −0.61 to 2.14, p=0.28) in the plasma Aβ40 values group. Plasma Aβ42 values group has a pooled SMD of −0.60 (95% CI −0.80 to −0.41, p<0.0001). In the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio group, the pooled SMD was −1.44 (95% CI −2.17 to −0.72, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Plasma Aβ40 values might not distinguish between PET (+) and PET (−) people. However, plasma Aβ42 values and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be served as independent biomarkers for predicting Aβ-PET status. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9016262/ /pubmed/35241627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurodegeneration
Cheng, Lizhen
Li, Wei
Chen, Yixin
Lin, Yijia
Wang, Beiyun
Guo, Qihao
Miao, Ya
Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
title Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort plasma aβ as a biomarker for predicting aβ-pet status in alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Neurodegeneration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864
work_keys_str_mv AT chenglizhen plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT liwei plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT chenyixin plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT linyijia plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT wangbeiyun plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT guoqihao plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT miaoya plasmaabasabiomarkerforpredictingabpetstatusinalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis