Cargando…

Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the person-centred, integrated care programme Care Chain Frail Elderly (CCFE) compared with usual care, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). DESIGN: In a 12-month quasi-experimental study, triple-aim outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months by trained...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoedemakers, Maaike, Karimi, Milad, Leijten, Fenna, Goossens, Lucas, Islam, Kamrul, Tsiachristas, Apostolos, Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672
_version_ 1784688520040808448
author Hoedemakers, Maaike
Karimi, Milad
Leijten, Fenna
Goossens, Lucas
Islam, Kamrul
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
author_facet Hoedemakers, Maaike
Karimi, Milad
Leijten, Fenna
Goossens, Lucas
Islam, Kamrul
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
author_sort Hoedemakers, Maaike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the person-centred, integrated care programme Care Chain Frail Elderly (CCFE) compared with usual care, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). DESIGN: In a 12-month quasi-experimental study, triple-aim outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months by trained interviewers during home-visits. SETTING: Primary care, community-based elderly care. PARTICIPANTS: 384 community-dwelling frail elderly were enrolled. The 12-month completion rate was 70% in both groups. Propensity score matching was used to balance age, gender, marital status, living situation, education, smoking status and 3 month costs prior to baseline between the two groups. INTERVENTION: The CCFE is an integrated care programme with unique features like the presence of the elderly and informal caregiver at the multidisciplinary team meetings, and a bundled payment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: The MCDA results in weighted overall value scores that combines the performance on physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and costs, with importance weights of patients, informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policy-makers. RESULTS: At 6 months, the overall value scores of CCFE were higher in all stakeholder groups, driven by enjoyment of life (standardised performance scores 0.729 vs 0.685) and person-centredness (0.749 vs 0.663). At 12 months, the overall value scores in both groups were similar from a patient’s perspective, slightly higher for CCFE from an informal caregiver’s and professional’s perspective, and lower for CCFE from a payer’s and policy-maker’s perspective. The latter was driven by a worse performance on physical functioning (0.682 vs 0.731) and higher costs (€22 816 vs €20 680). CONCLUSIONS: The MCDA indicated that the CCFE is the preferred way of delivering care to frail elderly at 6 months. However, at 12 months, MCDA results showed little difference from the perspective of patients, informal caregivers and professionals, while payers and policy-makers seemed to prefer usual care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9016393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90163932022-05-04 Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis Hoedemakers, Maaike Karimi, Milad Leijten, Fenna Goossens, Lucas Islam, Kamrul Tsiachristas, Apostolos Rutten-van Molken, Maureen BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the person-centred, integrated care programme Care Chain Frail Elderly (CCFE) compared with usual care, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). DESIGN: In a 12-month quasi-experimental study, triple-aim outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months by trained interviewers during home-visits. SETTING: Primary care, community-based elderly care. PARTICIPANTS: 384 community-dwelling frail elderly were enrolled. The 12-month completion rate was 70% in both groups. Propensity score matching was used to balance age, gender, marital status, living situation, education, smoking status and 3 month costs prior to baseline between the two groups. INTERVENTION: The CCFE is an integrated care programme with unique features like the presence of the elderly and informal caregiver at the multidisciplinary team meetings, and a bundled payment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: The MCDA results in weighted overall value scores that combines the performance on physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and costs, with importance weights of patients, informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policy-makers. RESULTS: At 6 months, the overall value scores of CCFE were higher in all stakeholder groups, driven by enjoyment of life (standardised performance scores 0.729 vs 0.685) and person-centredness (0.749 vs 0.663). At 12 months, the overall value scores in both groups were similar from a patient’s perspective, slightly higher for CCFE from an informal caregiver’s and professional’s perspective, and lower for CCFE from a payer’s and policy-maker’s perspective. The latter was driven by a worse performance on physical functioning (0.682 vs 0.731) and higher costs (€22 816 vs €20 680). CONCLUSIONS: The MCDA indicated that the CCFE is the preferred way of delivering care to frail elderly at 6 months. However, at 12 months, MCDA results showed little difference from the perspective of patients, informal caregivers and professionals, while payers and policy-makers seemed to prefer usual care. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9016393/ /pubmed/35437245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Hoedemakers, Maaike
Karimi, Milad
Leijten, Fenna
Goossens, Lucas
Islam, Kamrul
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
title Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
title_full Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
title_fullStr Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
title_full_unstemmed Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
title_short Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
title_sort value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672
work_keys_str_mv AT hoedemakersmaaike valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT karimimilad valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT leijtenfenna valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT goossenslucas valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT islamkamrul valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT tsiachristasapostolos valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureen valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis