Cargando…
Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the person-centred, integrated care programme Care Chain Frail Elderly (CCFE) compared with usual care, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). DESIGN: In a 12-month quasi-experimental study, triple-aim outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months by trained...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672 |
_version_ | 1784688520040808448 |
---|---|
author | Hoedemakers, Maaike Karimi, Milad Leijten, Fenna Goossens, Lucas Islam, Kamrul Tsiachristas, Apostolos Rutten-van Molken, Maureen |
author_facet | Hoedemakers, Maaike Karimi, Milad Leijten, Fenna Goossens, Lucas Islam, Kamrul Tsiachristas, Apostolos Rutten-van Molken, Maureen |
author_sort | Hoedemakers, Maaike |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the person-centred, integrated care programme Care Chain Frail Elderly (CCFE) compared with usual care, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). DESIGN: In a 12-month quasi-experimental study, triple-aim outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months by trained interviewers during home-visits. SETTING: Primary care, community-based elderly care. PARTICIPANTS: 384 community-dwelling frail elderly were enrolled. The 12-month completion rate was 70% in both groups. Propensity score matching was used to balance age, gender, marital status, living situation, education, smoking status and 3 month costs prior to baseline between the two groups. INTERVENTION: The CCFE is an integrated care programme with unique features like the presence of the elderly and informal caregiver at the multidisciplinary team meetings, and a bundled payment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: The MCDA results in weighted overall value scores that combines the performance on physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and costs, with importance weights of patients, informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policy-makers. RESULTS: At 6 months, the overall value scores of CCFE were higher in all stakeholder groups, driven by enjoyment of life (standardised performance scores 0.729 vs 0.685) and person-centredness (0.749 vs 0.663). At 12 months, the overall value scores in both groups were similar from a patient’s perspective, slightly higher for CCFE from an informal caregiver’s and professional’s perspective, and lower for CCFE from a payer’s and policy-maker’s perspective. The latter was driven by a worse performance on physical functioning (0.682 vs 0.731) and higher costs (€22 816 vs €20 680). CONCLUSIONS: The MCDA indicated that the CCFE is the preferred way of delivering care to frail elderly at 6 months. However, at 12 months, MCDA results showed little difference from the perspective of patients, informal caregivers and professionals, while payers and policy-makers seemed to prefer usual care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9016393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90163932022-05-04 Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis Hoedemakers, Maaike Karimi, Milad Leijten, Fenna Goossens, Lucas Islam, Kamrul Tsiachristas, Apostolos Rutten-van Molken, Maureen BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the person-centred, integrated care programme Care Chain Frail Elderly (CCFE) compared with usual care, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). DESIGN: In a 12-month quasi-experimental study, triple-aim outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months by trained interviewers during home-visits. SETTING: Primary care, community-based elderly care. PARTICIPANTS: 384 community-dwelling frail elderly were enrolled. The 12-month completion rate was 70% in both groups. Propensity score matching was used to balance age, gender, marital status, living situation, education, smoking status and 3 month costs prior to baseline between the two groups. INTERVENTION: The CCFE is an integrated care programme with unique features like the presence of the elderly and informal caregiver at the multidisciplinary team meetings, and a bundled payment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: The MCDA results in weighted overall value scores that combines the performance on physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and costs, with importance weights of patients, informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policy-makers. RESULTS: At 6 months, the overall value scores of CCFE were higher in all stakeholder groups, driven by enjoyment of life (standardised performance scores 0.729 vs 0.685) and person-centredness (0.749 vs 0.663). At 12 months, the overall value scores in both groups were similar from a patient’s perspective, slightly higher for CCFE from an informal caregiver’s and professional’s perspective, and lower for CCFE from a payer’s and policy-maker’s perspective. The latter was driven by a worse performance on physical functioning (0.682 vs 0.731) and higher costs (€22 816 vs €20 680). CONCLUSIONS: The MCDA indicated that the CCFE is the preferred way of delivering care to frail elderly at 6 months. However, at 12 months, MCDA results showed little difference from the perspective of patients, informal caregivers and professionals, while payers and policy-makers seemed to prefer usual care. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9016393/ /pubmed/35437245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Hoedemakers, Maaike Karimi, Milad Leijten, Fenna Goossens, Lucas Islam, Kamrul Tsiachristas, Apostolos Rutten-van Molken, Maureen Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
title | Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
title_full | Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
title_fullStr | Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
title_short | Value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
title_sort | value-based person-centred integrated care for frail elderly living at home: a quasi-experimental evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoedemakersmaaike valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT karimimilad valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT leijtenfenna valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT goossenslucas valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT islamkamrul valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT tsiachristasapostolos valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureen valuebasedpersoncentredintegratedcareforfrailelderlylivingathomeaquasiexperimentalevaluationusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis |