Cargando…

Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review published pretrial qualitative research studies and explore how their findings were used to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale trials. DESIGN: Qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elfeky, Adel, Treweek, Shaun, Hannes, Karin, Bruhn, Hanne, Fraser, Cynthia, Gillies, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055521
_version_ 1784688522075045888
author Elfeky, Adel
Treweek, Shaun
Hannes, Karin
Bruhn, Hanne
Fraser, Cynthia
Gillies, Katie
author_facet Elfeky, Adel
Treweek, Shaun
Hannes, Karin
Bruhn, Hanne
Fraser, Cynthia
Gillies, Katie
author_sort Elfeky, Adel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review published pretrial qualitative research studies and explore how their findings were used to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale trials. DESIGN: Qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases; Dissertation Abstracts International, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Sociological Abstracts and PsycINFO. We included all reports of pretrial qualitative data on recruitment and retention in clinical trials up to March 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined data extraction form that captured study aims, design, methodological approach and main findings, including barriers and facilitators to recruitment and or retention. The synthesis was undertaken using Thomas and Harden’s thematic synthesis method and reported following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines. Confidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach. RESULTS: Thirty-five papers (connected to 31 feasibility studies) from three different countries, published between 2010 and 2017 were included. All studies were embedded in pilot or feasibility studies to inform design aspects in preparation for a subsequent full-scale trial. Twelve themes were identified as recruitment barriers and three as recruitment facilitators. Two themes were identified as barriers for retention and none as retention facilitators. The findings from qualitative research in feasibility or pilot trials are often not explicitly linked to proposed changes to the recruitment and retention strategies to be used in the future or planned full-scale trial. CONCLUSIONS: Many trial teams do pretrial qualitative work with the aim of improving recruitment and retention in future full-scale trials. Just over half of all reports of such work do not clearly show how their findings will change the recruitment and retention strategy of the future trial. The scope of pretrial work needs to expand beyond looking for problems and also look for what might help and spend more time on retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9016401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90164012022-05-04 Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis Elfeky, Adel Treweek, Shaun Hannes, Karin Bruhn, Hanne Fraser, Cynthia Gillies, Katie BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To systematically review published pretrial qualitative research studies and explore how their findings were used to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale trials. DESIGN: Qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases; Dissertation Abstracts International, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Sociological Abstracts and PsycINFO. We included all reports of pretrial qualitative data on recruitment and retention in clinical trials up to March 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined data extraction form that captured study aims, design, methodological approach and main findings, including barriers and facilitators to recruitment and or retention. The synthesis was undertaken using Thomas and Harden’s thematic synthesis method and reported following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines. Confidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach. RESULTS: Thirty-five papers (connected to 31 feasibility studies) from three different countries, published between 2010 and 2017 were included. All studies were embedded in pilot or feasibility studies to inform design aspects in preparation for a subsequent full-scale trial. Twelve themes were identified as recruitment barriers and three as recruitment facilitators. Two themes were identified as barriers for retention and none as retention facilitators. The findings from qualitative research in feasibility or pilot trials are often not explicitly linked to proposed changes to the recruitment and retention strategies to be used in the future or planned full-scale trial. CONCLUSIONS: Many trial teams do pretrial qualitative work with the aim of improving recruitment and retention in future full-scale trials. Just over half of all reports of such work do not clearly show how their findings will change the recruitment and retention strategy of the future trial. The scope of pretrial work needs to expand beyond looking for problems and also look for what might help and spend more time on retention. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9016401/ /pubmed/35437247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055521 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Elfeky, Adel
Treweek, Shaun
Hannes, Karin
Bruhn, Hanne
Fraser, Cynthia
Gillies, Katie
Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_full Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_fullStr Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_short Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_sort using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055521
work_keys_str_mv AT elfekyadel usingqualitativemethodsinpilotandfeasibilitytrialstoinformrecruitmentandretentionprocessesinfullscalerandomisedtrialsaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT treweekshaun usingqualitativemethodsinpilotandfeasibilitytrialstoinformrecruitmentandretentionprocessesinfullscalerandomisedtrialsaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT hanneskarin usingqualitativemethodsinpilotandfeasibilitytrialstoinformrecruitmentandretentionprocessesinfullscalerandomisedtrialsaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT bruhnhanne usingqualitativemethodsinpilotandfeasibilitytrialstoinformrecruitmentandretentionprocessesinfullscalerandomisedtrialsaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT frasercynthia usingqualitativemethodsinpilotandfeasibilitytrialstoinformrecruitmentandretentionprocessesinfullscalerandomisedtrialsaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT gillieskatie usingqualitativemethodsinpilotandfeasibilitytrialstoinformrecruitmentandretentionprocessesinfullscalerandomisedtrialsaqualitativeevidencesynthesis