Cargando…
Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results
OBJECTIVES: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents about 5–10% of all urothelial malignancies with an increasing incidence. The standard diagnostic tools for the detection of UTUC are cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography, and ureterorenoscopy (URS). No biomarker to be inc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35450126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221090320 |
_version_ | 1784688559517597696 |
---|---|
author | D’Elia, Carolina Trenti, Emanuela Krause, Philipp Pycha, Alexander Mian, Christine Schwienbacher, Christine Hanspeter, Esther Kafka, Mona Palermo, Margherita Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo Holl, Stefanie Pycha, Armin |
author_facet | D’Elia, Carolina Trenti, Emanuela Krause, Philipp Pycha, Alexander Mian, Christine Schwienbacher, Christine Hanspeter, Esther Kafka, Mona Palermo, Margherita Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo Holl, Stefanie Pycha, Armin |
author_sort | D’Elia, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents about 5–10% of all urothelial malignancies with an increasing incidence. The standard diagnostic tools for the detection of UTUC are cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography, and ureterorenoscopy (URS). No biomarker to be included in the daily clinical practice has yet been identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential role of Xpert® Bladder-Cancer (BC)-Detection in the diagnosis of UTUC. METHODS: Eighty-two patients underwent 111 URS with Xpert® BC-Detection, cytology, or Urovysion® analysis of UT for suspicion of UTUC. Twenty-four cases were excluded from the analysis due to a non-diagnostic Xpert® BC-Detection, cytology, or Urovysion®. Samples were analyzed with upper tract (UT) urinary cytology, with Xpert® BC-Detection on UT urines, and with Urovysion® Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test. After urine collection, the patients underwent retrograde pyelography and/or URS, and if positive a UT biopsy. The Xpert® BC-Detection was reported by the software as negative or positive [cut-off total Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) = 0.45]. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytology, Xpert® BC-Detection and Urovysion-FISH were calculated using URS and/or histology results as reference. RESULTS: In all, 27 (31%) of 87 URS resulted positive, with 20 low-grade (LG) and 7 high-grade (HG) tumors. Overall sensitivity was 51.9% for cytology, 100% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 92.6% for Urovysion. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 26% in LG to 100% in HG tumors. For Xpert® BC-Detection, sensitivity was 100% both in LG and in HG, and for Urovysion-FISH, it increased from 90% in LG to 100% in HG tumors. PPV was 82.4% for cytology, 35% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 73.5% for Urovysion. NPV was 81.4% for cytology, 100% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 96.2% for Urovysion. CONCLUSION: The excellent NPV of Xpert® BC-Detection allows to avoid unnecessary endoscopic exploration of the UT, reducing invasiveness and URS complications in the follow-up of UTUC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9016582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90165822022-04-20 Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results D’Elia, Carolina Trenti, Emanuela Krause, Philipp Pycha, Alexander Mian, Christine Schwienbacher, Christine Hanspeter, Esther Kafka, Mona Palermo, Margherita Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo Holl, Stefanie Pycha, Armin Ther Adv Urol Management of Bladder Cancer: What is the Evidence? OBJECTIVES: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents about 5–10% of all urothelial malignancies with an increasing incidence. The standard diagnostic tools for the detection of UTUC are cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography, and ureterorenoscopy (URS). No biomarker to be included in the daily clinical practice has yet been identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential role of Xpert® Bladder-Cancer (BC)-Detection in the diagnosis of UTUC. METHODS: Eighty-two patients underwent 111 URS with Xpert® BC-Detection, cytology, or Urovysion® analysis of UT for suspicion of UTUC. Twenty-four cases were excluded from the analysis due to a non-diagnostic Xpert® BC-Detection, cytology, or Urovysion®. Samples were analyzed with upper tract (UT) urinary cytology, with Xpert® BC-Detection on UT urines, and with Urovysion® Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test. After urine collection, the patients underwent retrograde pyelography and/or URS, and if positive a UT biopsy. The Xpert® BC-Detection was reported by the software as negative or positive [cut-off total Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) = 0.45]. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytology, Xpert® BC-Detection and Urovysion-FISH were calculated using URS and/or histology results as reference. RESULTS: In all, 27 (31%) of 87 URS resulted positive, with 20 low-grade (LG) and 7 high-grade (HG) tumors. Overall sensitivity was 51.9% for cytology, 100% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 92.6% for Urovysion. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 26% in LG to 100% in HG tumors. For Xpert® BC-Detection, sensitivity was 100% both in LG and in HG, and for Urovysion-FISH, it increased from 90% in LG to 100% in HG tumors. PPV was 82.4% for cytology, 35% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 73.5% for Urovysion. NPV was 81.4% for cytology, 100% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 96.2% for Urovysion. CONCLUSION: The excellent NPV of Xpert® BC-Detection allows to avoid unnecessary endoscopic exploration of the UT, reducing invasiveness and URS complications in the follow-up of UTUC. SAGE Publications 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9016582/ /pubmed/35450126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221090320 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Management of Bladder Cancer: What is the Evidence? D’Elia, Carolina Trenti, Emanuela Krause, Philipp Pycha, Alexander Mian, Christine Schwienbacher, Christine Hanspeter, Esther Kafka, Mona Palermo, Margherita Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo Holl, Stefanie Pycha, Armin Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
title | Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
title_full | Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
title_fullStr | Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
title_full_unstemmed | Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
title_short | Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
title_sort | xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results |
topic | Management of Bladder Cancer: What is the Evidence? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35450126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221090320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deliacarolina xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT trentiemanuela xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT krausephilipp xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT pychaalexander xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT mianchristine xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT schwienbacherchristine xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT hanspeteresther xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT kafkamona xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT palermomargherita xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT spedicatogiorgioalfredo xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT hollstefanie xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults AT pychaarmin xpertbladdercancerdetectionasadiagnostictoolinupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinomapreliminaryresults |