Cargando…

An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser

The aim and objective of this study was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.2% chitosan, 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, alone and in conjunction with diode laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The root canals of 72 extracted intact human single-rooted teeth w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goel, Pallavi, Galhotra, Virat, Makkar, Sameer, Mohan, Jatinder, Bala, Neetu, Kaur, Tamanpreet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528502
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2351
_version_ 1784688653964935168
author Goel, Pallavi
Galhotra, Virat
Makkar, Sameer
Mohan, Jatinder
Bala, Neetu
Kaur, Tamanpreet
author_facet Goel, Pallavi
Galhotra, Virat
Makkar, Sameer
Mohan, Jatinder
Bala, Neetu
Kaur, Tamanpreet
author_sort Goel, Pallavi
collection PubMed
description The aim and objective of this study was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.2% chitosan, 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, alone and in conjunction with diode laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The root canals of 72 extracted intact human single-rooted teeth with single canals were prepared, and E. faecalis was incubated in the root canals for 7 days. The teeth were then randomly divided into the following four experimental groups: group I: Saline, group II: 0.2% Chitosan, group III: 3% Sodium hypochlorite, and group IV: 2% Chlorhexidine. These groups were further subdivided into three groups: (1) 10 mL irrigant only, (2) 10 mL irrigant, dried and irradiation with diode laser, (3) Diode laser was used for activation of irrigant solution. Samples were obtained from subgroups in each group and checked for turbidity. The effect of each irrigant was evaluated by counting the number of colony-forming units observed on inoculation with samples taken from the irrigated canal on bile esculin azide agar. The data thus obtained was recorded and put to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant reductions were noted in E. faecalis colony counts in all groups (p < 0.05). The greatest reduction in colony count (0%) was noted in group IV followed by group II. Also, samples disinfected with diode laser after root canal irrigation showed less number of colony-forming units per mL as compared to the samples irrigated with root canal solutions alone or diode laser alone. CONCLUSION: Chitosan has the capability for use as an accessory for disinfection of the root canal system. The application of an 810-nm diode laser by itself did not have the adequate antimicrobial activity to be used as an adjunct in root canal therapy. Irradiation with diode laser ought to be used in conjunction with the irrigant to gain maximum antibacterial effect against E. faecalis. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Goel P, Galhotra V, Makkar S, et al. An In-vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(1):109-114.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9016914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90169142022-05-06 An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser Goel, Pallavi Galhotra, Virat Makkar, Sameer Mohan, Jatinder Bala, Neetu Kaur, Tamanpreet Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article The aim and objective of this study was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.2% chitosan, 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, alone and in conjunction with diode laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The root canals of 72 extracted intact human single-rooted teeth with single canals were prepared, and E. faecalis was incubated in the root canals for 7 days. The teeth were then randomly divided into the following four experimental groups: group I: Saline, group II: 0.2% Chitosan, group III: 3% Sodium hypochlorite, and group IV: 2% Chlorhexidine. These groups were further subdivided into three groups: (1) 10 mL irrigant only, (2) 10 mL irrigant, dried and irradiation with diode laser, (3) Diode laser was used for activation of irrigant solution. Samples were obtained from subgroups in each group and checked for turbidity. The effect of each irrigant was evaluated by counting the number of colony-forming units observed on inoculation with samples taken from the irrigated canal on bile esculin azide agar. The data thus obtained was recorded and put to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant reductions were noted in E. faecalis colony counts in all groups (p < 0.05). The greatest reduction in colony count (0%) was noted in group IV followed by group II. Also, samples disinfected with diode laser after root canal irrigation showed less number of colony-forming units per mL as compared to the samples irrigated with root canal solutions alone or diode laser alone. CONCLUSION: Chitosan has the capability for use as an accessory for disinfection of the root canal system. The application of an 810-nm diode laser by itself did not have the adequate antimicrobial activity to be used as an adjunct in root canal therapy. Irradiation with diode laser ought to be used in conjunction with the irrigant to gain maximum antibacterial effect against E. faecalis. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Goel P, Galhotra V, Makkar S, et al. An In-vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(1):109-114. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9016914/ /pubmed/35528502 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2351 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non - commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goel, Pallavi
Galhotra, Virat
Makkar, Sameer
Mohan, Jatinder
Bala, Neetu
Kaur, Tamanpreet
An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser
title An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser
title_full An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser
title_fullStr An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser
title_full_unstemmed An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser
title_short An In Vitro Study Comparing the Antimicrobial Efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis, Alone and in Conjunction with Diode Laser
title_sort in vitro study comparing the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.2% chitosan, 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine against enterococcus faecalis, alone and in conjunction with diode laser
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528502
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2351
work_keys_str_mv AT goelpallavi aninvitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT galhotravirat aninvitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT makkarsameer aninvitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT mohanjatinder aninvitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT balaneetu aninvitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT kaurtamanpreet aninvitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT goelpallavi invitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT galhotravirat invitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT makkarsameer invitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT mohanjatinder invitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT balaneetu invitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser
AT kaurtamanpreet invitrostudycomparingtheantimicrobialefficacyof02chitosan3sodiumhypochlorite2chlorhexidineagainstenterococcusfaecalisaloneandinconjunctionwithdiodelaser