Cargando…
Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index
OBJECTIVE: Ablation index (AI) is an effective ablation quality marker. Impedance is also an important factor for lesion formation. The present study evaluated the influence of the baseline impedance in the effect of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) guided by AI. METHODS: This was a retrospecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02530-y |
_version_ | 1784688669247930368 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Yuanjun Xiao, Xianjie Yin, Xiaomeng Gao, Lianjun Yu, Xiaohong Zhang, Rongfeng Wang, Zhongzhen Dai, Shiyu Yang, Yanzong Xia, Yunlong |
author_facet | Sun, Yuanjun Xiao, Xianjie Yin, Xiaomeng Gao, Lianjun Yu, Xiaohong Zhang, Rongfeng Wang, Zhongzhen Dai, Shiyu Yang, Yanzong Xia, Yunlong |
author_sort | Sun, Yuanjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Ablation index (AI) is an effective ablation quality marker. Impedance is also an important factor for lesion formation. The present study evaluated the influence of the baseline impedance in the effect of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) guided by AI. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. 101 patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were enrolled. All patients underwent radiofrequency ablation guided by the same AI strategy. The ablation strategy was pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with non-PV triggers ablation. The baseline impedance of the ablation points was recorded. The patients were followed up every 3 months or so. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12 (4–14) months, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence were 82.2%. No difference existed in baseline characteristics between the success group and the recurrence group. The average baseline impedance was 124.3 ± 9.7 Ω. The baseline impedance of the ablation points in success group was lower compared to the recurrence group (122.9 ± 9.4 vs. 130.5 ± 8.8 Ω, P < 0.01). The ratio of impedance drop in the success group was higher than the recurrence group ([8.8 ± 1.4]% vs. [8.1 ± 1.2]%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline impedance, PAF duration and AI were the independent predictors of AF recurrence. The cumulative free of recurrence rate of low-impedance group (≤ 124 Ω, n = 54) was higher than that of high-impedance group. CONCLUSION: Baseline impedance correlates with clinical outcome of radiofrequency ablation for PAF guided by AI. Higher impedance in the same AI strategy may result in an ineffective lesion which probably causes recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02530-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9016960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90169602022-04-20 Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index Sun, Yuanjun Xiao, Xianjie Yin, Xiaomeng Gao, Lianjun Yu, Xiaohong Zhang, Rongfeng Wang, Zhongzhen Dai, Shiyu Yang, Yanzong Xia, Yunlong BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research OBJECTIVE: Ablation index (AI) is an effective ablation quality marker. Impedance is also an important factor for lesion formation. The present study evaluated the influence of the baseline impedance in the effect of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) guided by AI. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. 101 patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were enrolled. All patients underwent radiofrequency ablation guided by the same AI strategy. The ablation strategy was pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with non-PV triggers ablation. The baseline impedance of the ablation points was recorded. The patients were followed up every 3 months or so. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12 (4–14) months, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence were 82.2%. No difference existed in baseline characteristics between the success group and the recurrence group. The average baseline impedance was 124.3 ± 9.7 Ω. The baseline impedance of the ablation points in success group was lower compared to the recurrence group (122.9 ± 9.4 vs. 130.5 ± 8.8 Ω, P < 0.01). The ratio of impedance drop in the success group was higher than the recurrence group ([8.8 ± 1.4]% vs. [8.1 ± 1.2]%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline impedance, PAF duration and AI were the independent predictors of AF recurrence. The cumulative free of recurrence rate of low-impedance group (≤ 124 Ω, n = 54) was higher than that of high-impedance group. CONCLUSION: Baseline impedance correlates with clinical outcome of radiofrequency ablation for PAF guided by AI. Higher impedance in the same AI strategy may result in an ineffective lesion which probably causes recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02530-y. BioMed Central 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9016960/ /pubmed/35439961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02530-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sun, Yuanjun Xiao, Xianjie Yin, Xiaomeng Gao, Lianjun Yu, Xiaohong Zhang, Rongfeng Wang, Zhongzhen Dai, Shiyu Yang, Yanzong Xia, Yunlong Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
title | Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
title_full | Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
title_fullStr | Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
title_short | Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
title_sort | impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02530-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunyuanjun impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT xiaoxianjie impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT yinxiaomeng impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT gaolianjun impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT yuxiaohong impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT zhangrongfeng impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT wangzhongzhen impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT daishiyu impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT yangyanzong impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex AT xiayunlong impactofbaselineimpedanceofpulmonaryveinantrumonsuccessofcatheterablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationguidedbyablationindex |