Cargando…

Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have explored the factors influencing user uptake of interventions designed to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to acceptance of a pilot intervention, the TDM Advisory Service (the Service), that provided prescr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yager, Rachel Constance, Taylor, Natalie, Stocker, Sophie Lena, Day, Richard Osborne, Baysari, Melissa Therese, Carland, Jane Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07927-1
_version_ 1784688682387636224
author Yager, Rachel Constance
Taylor, Natalie
Stocker, Sophie Lena
Day, Richard Osborne
Baysari, Melissa Therese
Carland, Jane Ellen
author_facet Yager, Rachel Constance
Taylor, Natalie
Stocker, Sophie Lena
Day, Richard Osborne
Baysari, Melissa Therese
Carland, Jane Ellen
author_sort Yager, Rachel Constance
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Few studies have explored the factors influencing user uptake of interventions designed to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to acceptance of a pilot intervention, the TDM Advisory Service (the Service), that provided prescribing advice for the antibiotic, vancomycin at an Australian public hospital. METHODS: A sample of prescribers and pharmacists who had interacted with the Service (n = 10), and a sample who had not (n = 13), participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed independently by two researchers for emerging themes. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to synthesise barriers and facilitators to Service acceptance. RESULTS: Key barriers reported by participants who had interacted with the Service aligned with two TDF domains: ‘Social Influences’ (prescribing hierarchy) and ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ (accessibility of dose advice). For participants who had not interacted with the Service, key barriers aligned with two TDF domains: ‘Knowledge’ (uncertainty of Service processes) and ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ (accessibility of dose advice). Key facilitators for both participant groups aligned with ‘Beliefs about Consequences’ (improved prescribing and patient outcomes) and ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ (accessibility of dose advice). A novel domain, ‘Trust’, was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of participant interaction with the Service, knowledge of Service processes, perceived beneficial outcomes, improved accessibility, and trust in Service capabilities were key determinants of acceptance. This evidence can be used to inform the adoption of strategies to adapt and enhance integration of the Service into clinical workflow. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07927-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9017013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90170132022-04-20 Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service Yager, Rachel Constance Taylor, Natalie Stocker, Sophie Lena Day, Richard Osborne Baysari, Melissa Therese Carland, Jane Ellen BMC Health Serv Res Research Article OBJECTIVES: Few studies have explored the factors influencing user uptake of interventions designed to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to acceptance of a pilot intervention, the TDM Advisory Service (the Service), that provided prescribing advice for the antibiotic, vancomycin at an Australian public hospital. METHODS: A sample of prescribers and pharmacists who had interacted with the Service (n = 10), and a sample who had not (n = 13), participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed independently by two researchers for emerging themes. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to synthesise barriers and facilitators to Service acceptance. RESULTS: Key barriers reported by participants who had interacted with the Service aligned with two TDF domains: ‘Social Influences’ (prescribing hierarchy) and ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ (accessibility of dose advice). For participants who had not interacted with the Service, key barriers aligned with two TDF domains: ‘Knowledge’ (uncertainty of Service processes) and ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ (accessibility of dose advice). Key facilitators for both participant groups aligned with ‘Beliefs about Consequences’ (improved prescribing and patient outcomes) and ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ (accessibility of dose advice). A novel domain, ‘Trust’, was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of participant interaction with the Service, knowledge of Service processes, perceived beneficial outcomes, improved accessibility, and trust in Service capabilities were key determinants of acceptance. This evidence can be used to inform the adoption of strategies to adapt and enhance integration of the Service into clinical workflow. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07927-1. BioMed Central 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9017013/ /pubmed/35436887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07927-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yager, Rachel Constance
Taylor, Natalie
Stocker, Sophie Lena
Day, Richard Osborne
Baysari, Melissa Therese
Carland, Jane Ellen
Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
title Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
title_full Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
title_fullStr Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
title_full_unstemmed Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
title_short Would they accept it? An interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
title_sort would they accept it? an interview study to identify barriers and facilitators to user acceptance of a prescribing advice service
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07927-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yagerrachelconstance wouldtheyacceptitaninterviewstudytoidentifybarriersandfacilitatorstouseracceptanceofaprescribingadviceservice
AT taylornatalie wouldtheyacceptitaninterviewstudytoidentifybarriersandfacilitatorstouseracceptanceofaprescribingadviceservice
AT stockersophielena wouldtheyacceptitaninterviewstudytoidentifybarriersandfacilitatorstouseracceptanceofaprescribingadviceservice
AT dayrichardosborne wouldtheyacceptitaninterviewstudytoidentifybarriersandfacilitatorstouseracceptanceofaprescribingadviceservice
AT baysarimelissatherese wouldtheyacceptitaninterviewstudytoidentifybarriersandfacilitatorstouseracceptanceofaprescribingadviceservice
AT carlandjaneellen wouldtheyacceptitaninterviewstudytoidentifybarriersandfacilitatorstouseracceptanceofaprescribingadviceservice