Cargando…

A Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Value of CTA and MRA in Anterior Dislocation of Shoulder

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of CTA and MRA in anterior dislocation of shoulder. METHODS: The detection of inferior glenohumeral ligament injuries, anterior inferior labrum injuries, and bone and cartilage injuries by the two examination procedures was observed and compared with th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Junhua, Zhang, Tao, Li, Xuxue, Dan, Qian, Zhang, Dezhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35450205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9461236
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of CTA and MRA in anterior dislocation of shoulder. METHODS: The detection of inferior glenohumeral ligament injuries, anterior inferior labrum injuries, and bone and cartilage injuries by the two examination procedures was observed and compared with the results of arthroscopy or surgery on patients referred to our hospital owing to anterior dislocation of shoulder. Results. A total of 36 patients with shoulder injuries were gathered for this study. 32 cases with anterior inferior labrum tearings (27 cases detected by CTA and 30 cases by MRA), 24 cases with inferior glenohumeral ligament tearings (14 cases detected by CTA and 22 cases by MRA), 24 cases with inferior glenohumeral ligament tearings (14 cases detected by CTA and 22 cases by MRA), and 24 cases with inferior glenohumeral ligament tearings (14 cases detected by CTA and 22 cases by MRA) were detected. There were 30 bone and cartilage injuries, including 18 fractures (CTA identified 18), 10 bone contusions (CTA detected 0), and 5 cartilage damage (CTA detected 0) (CTA detected 0, MRA detected 5). CONCLUSION: The detection rate of MRA is better than that of CTA for inferior glenohumeral ligament injuries. For anterior inferior labrum injury, the detection rate of CTA and MRA was similar. CTA is more conducive to the detection of fracture blocks, while MRA is more advantageous for the observation of bone contusion and cartilage damage.