Cargando…

The Combination of (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Metabolic and Clinical Parameters Can Effectively Distinguish Rheumatoid Arthritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatic

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET) and clinical parameters to differentiate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR). Patients and Methods. This retrospective study evaluated 54 patients with suspected RA (n = 23) and PMR (n = ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Guanyun, Liu, Xiaofei, Chen, Jiaxin, Zhang, Fengyan, Xu, Xiaodan, Wang, Yanmei, Wang, Ruimin, Yao, Shulin, Zhu, Jian, Guan, Zhiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9614678
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET) and clinical parameters to differentiate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR). Patients and Methods. This retrospective study evaluated 54 patients with suspected RA (n = 23) and PMR (n = 31) who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. The complete diagnosis was based on each classification criterion and at least followed up for 6 months. Demographic and clinical data were also collected. Semiquantitative analysis (maximum standardized uptake value, SUVmax) of abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake was undertaken at 17 musculoskeletal sites, and two scoring systems (mean reference (liver/control) scores) were evaluated. The differential diagnostic efficacy of each independent parameter was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Integrated discriminatory improvement (IDI) and bootstrap tests were used to evaluate the improvement in diagnostic efficacy using a combination of multiple parameters. RESULTS: The ROC curve analysis of SUVmax indicated that the interspinous ligament showed the highest discriminative diagnostic value (sensitivity, 64.5%; specificity, 78.3%; area under the curve (AUC), 0.764; positive predictive value, 0.800; negative predictive value, 0.621). The combined model with the rheumatoid factor (RF) and metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET resulted in the highest AUC of 0.892 and showed significant reclassification by IDI (IDI, 9.51%; 95% confidence interval: 0.021–0.175; P = 0.013). According to the bootstrap test, compared with RF alone, the combination of RF and metabolic parameters showed an improvement in ROC and was statistically significant (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of (18)F-FDG PET metabolic and clinical parameters can further improve the differential diagnosis of RA and PMR.