Cargando…
XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278 |
_version_ | 1784688848470540288 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Xiao‐Dong Huang, Ming‐Zhu Wang, Yu‐Sheng Feng, Wan‐Jing Chen, Zhi‐Yu He, Yi‐Fu Zhang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, Xin Wang, Chen‐Chen Zhang, Wen Ying, Jie‐Er Wu, Jun Yang, Lei Qin, Yan‐Ru Luo, Jian‐Feng Zhao, Xiao‐Ying Li, Wen‐Hua Zhang, Zhe Qiu, Li‐Xin Geng, Qi‐Rong Zou, Jian‐Ling Zhang, Jie‐Yun Zheng, Hong Song, Xue‐Feng Wu, Shu‐Sheng Zhang, Cheng‐Yan Gong, Zhe Liu, Qin‐Qin Wang, Xiao‐Feng Xu, Qi Wang, Qi Ji, Jian‐Mei Zhao, Jian Guo, Wei‐Jian |
author_facet | Zhu, Xiao‐Dong Huang, Ming‐Zhu Wang, Yu‐Sheng Feng, Wan‐Jing Chen, Zhi‐Yu He, Yi‐Fu Zhang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, Xin Wang, Chen‐Chen Zhang, Wen Ying, Jie‐Er Wu, Jun Yang, Lei Qin, Yan‐Ru Luo, Jian‐Feng Zhao, Xiao‐Ying Li, Wen‐Hua Zhang, Zhe Qiu, Li‐Xin Geng, Qi‐Rong Zou, Jian‐Ling Zhang, Jie‐Yun Zheng, Hong Song, Xue‐Feng Wu, Shu‐Sheng Zhang, Cheng‐Yan Gong, Zhe Liu, Qin‐Qin Wang, Xiao‐Feng Xu, Qi Wang, Qi Ji, Jian‐Mei Zhao, Jian Guo, Wei‐Jian |
author_sort | Zhu, Xiao‐Dong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC. METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority in progression‐free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention‐to‐treat basis. RESULTS: Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5‐6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0‐6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812‐1.203; P (non‐inferiority) = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health‐related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This non‐inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first‐line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9017757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90177572022-04-21 XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) Zhu, Xiao‐Dong Huang, Ming‐Zhu Wang, Yu‐Sheng Feng, Wan‐Jing Chen, Zhi‐Yu He, Yi‐Fu Zhang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, Xin Wang, Chen‐Chen Zhang, Wen Ying, Jie‐Er Wu, Jun Yang, Lei Qin, Yan‐Ru Luo, Jian‐Feng Zhao, Xiao‐Ying Li, Wen‐Hua Zhang, Zhe Qiu, Li‐Xin Geng, Qi‐Rong Zou, Jian‐Ling Zhang, Jie‐Yun Zheng, Hong Song, Xue‐Feng Wu, Shu‐Sheng Zhang, Cheng‐Yan Gong, Zhe Liu, Qin‐Qin Wang, Xiao‐Feng Xu, Qi Wang, Qi Ji, Jian‐Mei Zhao, Jian Guo, Wei‐Jian Cancer Commun (Lond) Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC. METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority in progression‐free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention‐to‐treat basis. RESULTS: Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5‐6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0‐6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812‐1.203; P (non‐inferiority) = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health‐related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This non‐inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first‐line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9017757/ /pubmed/35212487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. on behalf of Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zhu, Xiao‐Dong Huang, Ming‐Zhu Wang, Yu‐Sheng Feng, Wan‐Jing Chen, Zhi‐Yu He, Yi‐Fu Zhang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, Xin Wang, Chen‐Chen Zhang, Wen Ying, Jie‐Er Wu, Jun Yang, Lei Qin, Yan‐Ru Luo, Jian‐Feng Zhao, Xiao‐Ying Li, Wen‐Hua Zhang, Zhe Qiu, Li‐Xin Geng, Qi‐Rong Zou, Jian‐Ling Zhang, Jie‐Yun Zheng, Hong Song, Xue‐Feng Wu, Shu‐Sheng Zhang, Cheng‐Yan Gong, Zhe Liu, Qin‐Qin Wang, Xiao‐Feng Xu, Qi Wang, Qi Ji, Jian‐Mei Zhao, Jian Guo, Wei‐Jian XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) |
title | XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) |
title_full | XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) |
title_fullStr | XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) |
title_full_unstemmed | XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) |
title_short | XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) |
title_sort | xelox doublet regimen versus eox triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: an open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase iii trial (exelox) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuxiaodong xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT huangmingzhu xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT wangyusheng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT fengwanjing xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT chenzhiyu xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT heyifu xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhangxiaowei xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT liuxin xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT wangchenchen xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhangwen xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT yingjieer xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT wujun xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT yanglei xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT qinyanru xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT luojianfeng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhaoxiaoying xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT liwenhua xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhangzhe xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT qiulixin xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT gengqirong xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zoujianling xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhangjieyun xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhenghong xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT songxuefeng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT wushusheng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhangchengyan xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT gongzhe xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT liuqinqin xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT wangxiaofeng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT xuqi xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT wangqi xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT jijianmei xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT zhaojian xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox AT guoweijian xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox |