Cargando…

XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Xiao‐Dong, Huang, Ming‐Zhu, Wang, Yu‐Sheng, Feng, Wan‐Jing, Chen, Zhi‐Yu, He, Yi‐Fu, Zhang, Xiao‐Wei, Liu, Xin, Wang, Chen‐Chen, Zhang, Wen, Ying, Jie‐Er, Wu, Jun, Yang, Lei, Qin, Yan‐Ru, Luo, Jian‐Feng, Zhao, Xiao‐Ying, Li, Wen‐Hua, Zhang, Zhe, Qiu, Li‐Xin, Geng, Qi‐Rong, Zou, Jian‐Ling, Zhang, Jie‐Yun, Zheng, Hong, Song, Xue‐Feng, Wu, Shu‐Sheng, Zhang, Cheng‐Yan, Gong, Zhe, Liu, Qin‐Qin, Wang, Xiao‐Feng, Xu, Qi, Wang, Qi, Ji, Jian‐Mei, Zhao, Jian, Guo, Wei‐Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278
_version_ 1784688848470540288
author Zhu, Xiao‐Dong
Huang, Ming‐Zhu
Wang, Yu‐Sheng
Feng, Wan‐Jing
Chen, Zhi‐Yu
He, Yi‐Fu
Zhang, Xiao‐Wei
Liu, Xin
Wang, Chen‐Chen
Zhang, Wen
Ying, Jie‐Er
Wu, Jun
Yang, Lei
Qin, Yan‐Ru
Luo, Jian‐Feng
Zhao, Xiao‐Ying
Li, Wen‐Hua
Zhang, Zhe
Qiu, Li‐Xin
Geng, Qi‐Rong
Zou, Jian‐Ling
Zhang, Jie‐Yun
Zheng, Hong
Song, Xue‐Feng
Wu, Shu‐Sheng
Zhang, Cheng‐Yan
Gong, Zhe
Liu, Qin‐Qin
Wang, Xiao‐Feng
Xu, Qi
Wang, Qi
Ji, Jian‐Mei
Zhao, Jian
Guo, Wei‐Jian
author_facet Zhu, Xiao‐Dong
Huang, Ming‐Zhu
Wang, Yu‐Sheng
Feng, Wan‐Jing
Chen, Zhi‐Yu
He, Yi‐Fu
Zhang, Xiao‐Wei
Liu, Xin
Wang, Chen‐Chen
Zhang, Wen
Ying, Jie‐Er
Wu, Jun
Yang, Lei
Qin, Yan‐Ru
Luo, Jian‐Feng
Zhao, Xiao‐Ying
Li, Wen‐Hua
Zhang, Zhe
Qiu, Li‐Xin
Geng, Qi‐Rong
Zou, Jian‐Ling
Zhang, Jie‐Yun
Zheng, Hong
Song, Xue‐Feng
Wu, Shu‐Sheng
Zhang, Cheng‐Yan
Gong, Zhe
Liu, Qin‐Qin
Wang, Xiao‐Feng
Xu, Qi
Wang, Qi
Ji, Jian‐Mei
Zhao, Jian
Guo, Wei‐Jian
author_sort Zhu, Xiao‐Dong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC. METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority in progression‐free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention‐to‐treat basis. RESULTS: Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5‐6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0‐6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812‐1.203; P (non‐inferiority) = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health‐related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This non‐inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first‐line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9017757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90177572022-04-21 XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX) Zhu, Xiao‐Dong Huang, Ming‐Zhu Wang, Yu‐Sheng Feng, Wan‐Jing Chen, Zhi‐Yu He, Yi‐Fu Zhang, Xiao‐Wei Liu, Xin Wang, Chen‐Chen Zhang, Wen Ying, Jie‐Er Wu, Jun Yang, Lei Qin, Yan‐Ru Luo, Jian‐Feng Zhao, Xiao‐Ying Li, Wen‐Hua Zhang, Zhe Qiu, Li‐Xin Geng, Qi‐Rong Zou, Jian‐Ling Zhang, Jie‐Yun Zheng, Hong Song, Xue‐Feng Wu, Shu‐Sheng Zhang, Cheng‐Yan Gong, Zhe Liu, Qin‐Qin Wang, Xiao‐Feng Xu, Qi Wang, Qi Ji, Jian‐Mei Zhao, Jian Guo, Wei‐Jian Cancer Commun (Lond) Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC. METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority in progression‐free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention‐to‐treat basis. RESULTS: Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5‐6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0‐6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812‐1.203; P (non‐inferiority) = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health‐related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This non‐inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first‐line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9017757/ /pubmed/35212487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. on behalf of Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhu, Xiao‐Dong
Huang, Ming‐Zhu
Wang, Yu‐Sheng
Feng, Wan‐Jing
Chen, Zhi‐Yu
He, Yi‐Fu
Zhang, Xiao‐Wei
Liu, Xin
Wang, Chen‐Chen
Zhang, Wen
Ying, Jie‐Er
Wu, Jun
Yang, Lei
Qin, Yan‐Ru
Luo, Jian‐Feng
Zhao, Xiao‐Ying
Li, Wen‐Hua
Zhang, Zhe
Qiu, Li‐Xin
Geng, Qi‐Rong
Zou, Jian‐Ling
Zhang, Jie‐Yun
Zheng, Hong
Song, Xue‐Feng
Wu, Shu‐Sheng
Zhang, Cheng‐Yan
Gong, Zhe
Liu, Qin‐Qin
Wang, Xiao‐Feng
Xu, Qi
Wang, Qi
Ji, Jian‐Mei
Zhao, Jian
Guo, Wei‐Jian
XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
title XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
title_full XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
title_fullStr XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
title_full_unstemmed XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
title_short XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)
title_sort xelox doublet regimen versus eox triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: an open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase iii trial (exelox)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuxiaodong xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT huangmingzhu xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT wangyusheng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT fengwanjing xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT chenzhiyu xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT heyifu xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhangxiaowei xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT liuxin xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT wangchenchen xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhangwen xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT yingjieer xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT wujun xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT yanglei xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT qinyanru xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT luojianfeng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhaoxiaoying xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT liwenhua xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhangzhe xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT qiulixin xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT gengqirong xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zoujianling xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhangjieyun xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhenghong xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT songxuefeng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT wushusheng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhangchengyan xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT gongzhe xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT liuqinqin xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT wangxiaofeng xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT xuqi xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT wangqi xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT jijianmei xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT zhaojian xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox
AT guoweijian xeloxdoubletregimenversuseoxtripletregimenasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccanceranopenlabeledmulticenterrandomizedprospectivephaseiiitrialexelox