Cargando…

Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION: Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition causing severe incapacitating pain. Several methods of treatment have been approached for its management. In our study we aim to compare the results of injecting steroid and lignocaine mixture via single injection and peppered injection techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prakash, YR, Dhanda, A, Yallapur, KL, Inamdar, SS, Darshan, GT, Ramakrishna, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35519523
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2203.013
_version_ 1784688886189916160
author Prakash, YR
Dhanda, A
Yallapur, KL
Inamdar, SS
Darshan, GT
Ramakrishna, M
author_facet Prakash, YR
Dhanda, A
Yallapur, KL
Inamdar, SS
Darshan, GT
Ramakrishna, M
author_sort Prakash, YR
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition causing severe incapacitating pain. Several methods of treatment have been approached for its management. In our study we aim to compare the results of injecting steroid and lignocaine mixture via single injection and peppered injection technique and analyse the outcome in each category. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study comprising of 25 patients in each group (single vs peppered group) were included in the study after satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcome of the treatment was measured in the form of Patient Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Questionnaire, Visual analogue score (VAS) and tenderness grading at two weeks, six weeks and six months after injection. RESULTS: Results of our study showed that the mean PRTEE score was 22.36, 18.40 and 14.16 at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months following peppered injection as compared to 28.96, 21.84 and 25.32 in the single injection group (p value <0.05). VAS score at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after the peppered injection was found to be 2.72, 1.72 and 1.36 and in the single injection group was 2.96, 1.92 and 2.72 at 2weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively (p value <0.05). On comparison of the 2 groups, there was a significant reduction of VAS scores at 6 months post-injection (p value <0.05) and PRTEE score at 6 weeks, 6 months in peppered injection group. CONCLUSION: The effects of peppered injection technique is seen to be advantageous over the single injection technique in the management of chronic lateral epicondylitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9017907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90179072022-05-04 Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study Prakash, YR Dhanda, A Yallapur, KL Inamdar, SS Darshan, GT Ramakrishna, M Malays Orthop J Original Study INTRODUCTION: Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition causing severe incapacitating pain. Several methods of treatment have been approached for its management. In our study we aim to compare the results of injecting steroid and lignocaine mixture via single injection and peppered injection technique and analyse the outcome in each category. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study comprising of 25 patients in each group (single vs peppered group) were included in the study after satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcome of the treatment was measured in the form of Patient Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Questionnaire, Visual analogue score (VAS) and tenderness grading at two weeks, six weeks and six months after injection. RESULTS: Results of our study showed that the mean PRTEE score was 22.36, 18.40 and 14.16 at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months following peppered injection as compared to 28.96, 21.84 and 25.32 in the single injection group (p value <0.05). VAS score at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after the peppered injection was found to be 2.72, 1.72 and 1.36 and in the single injection group was 2.96, 1.92 and 2.72 at 2weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively (p value <0.05). On comparison of the 2 groups, there was a significant reduction of VAS scores at 6 months post-injection (p value <0.05) and PRTEE score at 6 weeks, 6 months in peppered injection group. CONCLUSION: The effects of peppered injection technique is seen to be advantageous over the single injection technique in the management of chronic lateral epicondylitis. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9017907/ /pubmed/35519523 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2203.013 Text en © 2022 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association MOA. All Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Study
Prakash, YR
Dhanda, A
Yallapur, KL
Inamdar, SS
Darshan, GT
Ramakrishna, M
Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study
title Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study
title_full Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study
title_short Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study
title_sort peppering versus single injection technique in tennis elbow - a prospective comparative study
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35519523
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2203.013
work_keys_str_mv AT prakashyr pepperingversussingleinjectiontechniqueintenniselbowaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT dhandaa pepperingversussingleinjectiontechniqueintenniselbowaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT yallapurkl pepperingversussingleinjectiontechniqueintenniselbowaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT inamdarss pepperingversussingleinjectiontechniqueintenniselbowaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT darshangt pepperingversussingleinjectiontechniqueintenniselbowaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT ramakrishnam pepperingversussingleinjectiontechniqueintenniselbowaprospectivecomparativestudy