Cargando…
The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07361-y |
_version_ | 1784688903794458624 |
---|---|
author | Kundu, Debasree Gautam, Priyanka Dayanand, Divya Gunasekaran, Karthik Manesh, Abi Sebastian, Merylin Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P. Zachariah, Anand George, Tina Sathyendra, Sowmya Hansdak, Samuel G. Abraham, O. C. Iyadurai, Ramya Thangakunam, Balamugesh Gupta, Richa Karthik, Rajiv Moorthy, Mahesh Varghese, George M. |
author_facet | Kundu, Debasree Gautam, Priyanka Dayanand, Divya Gunasekaran, Karthik Manesh, Abi Sebastian, Merylin Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P. Zachariah, Anand George, Tina Sathyendra, Sowmya Hansdak, Samuel G. Abraham, O. C. Iyadurai, Ramya Thangakunam, Balamugesh Gupta, Richa Karthik, Rajiv Moorthy, Mahesh Varghese, George M. |
author_sort | Kundu, Debasree |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with fever for > 5 days, admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital in South India, were enrolled prospectively between June and December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed patients were classified as cases, and patients with febrile illness with laboratory-confirmed alternative diagnosis and healthy participants were controls. All participants were tested with SCoV-2 Detect™ IgM ELISA kit and SCoV-2 Detect™ IgG ELISA kit (InBios International, Seattle, USA) (Inbios), SARS-CoV-2 Total and SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, USA) (Siemens), Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) (Roche), Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA) (Abbott), and Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorinS.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) (Liaison). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracies were compared. RESULTS: There were 303 participants: 153 cases and 150 controls. ELISA detecting anti-S protein antibody was more sensitive (88.9% for IgG and 86.3% for IgM) than the CLIAs (82.4% for total antibodies and 76.5–85.6% for IgG). Among CLIAs, Roche IgG was most sensitive (85.6%) followed by Abbott (83%) and Liaison (83%). Abbot had the best PPV (88.8%) and was more specific (89.3%) than Liaison (82%) and Roche (82%). Siemens IgG was less sensitive (76.5%) than Siemens Total (82.4%). The specificity of all the serological assays was modest (75–90%). Antibody test positivity increased with the duration of illness reaching 90% after 10 days of illness. When cases were compared against pre-pandemic controls, the IgG gave excellent specificity (98–100%). For seroprevalence studies, InBios IgG had the best accuracy (90.8%) with 88.9% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. CONCLUSION: The serological assays are important adjuncts for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with persistent symptoms, especially in the second week of illness. The value of serological diagnostic tests is limited in the first week of illness and they provide additional value in seroprevalence studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELISA and CLIA platforms were comparable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9017961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90179612022-04-20 The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 Kundu, Debasree Gautam, Priyanka Dayanand, Divya Gunasekaran, Karthik Manesh, Abi Sebastian, Merylin Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P. Zachariah, Anand George, Tina Sathyendra, Sowmya Hansdak, Samuel G. Abraham, O. C. Iyadurai, Ramya Thangakunam, Balamugesh Gupta, Richa Karthik, Rajiv Moorthy, Mahesh Varghese, George M. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with fever for > 5 days, admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital in South India, were enrolled prospectively between June and December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed patients were classified as cases, and patients with febrile illness with laboratory-confirmed alternative diagnosis and healthy participants were controls. All participants were tested with SCoV-2 Detect™ IgM ELISA kit and SCoV-2 Detect™ IgG ELISA kit (InBios International, Seattle, USA) (Inbios), SARS-CoV-2 Total and SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, USA) (Siemens), Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) (Roche), Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA) (Abbott), and Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorinS.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) (Liaison). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracies were compared. RESULTS: There were 303 participants: 153 cases and 150 controls. ELISA detecting anti-S protein antibody was more sensitive (88.9% for IgG and 86.3% for IgM) than the CLIAs (82.4% for total antibodies and 76.5–85.6% for IgG). Among CLIAs, Roche IgG was most sensitive (85.6%) followed by Abbott (83%) and Liaison (83%). Abbot had the best PPV (88.8%) and was more specific (89.3%) than Liaison (82%) and Roche (82%). Siemens IgG was less sensitive (76.5%) than Siemens Total (82.4%). The specificity of all the serological assays was modest (75–90%). Antibody test positivity increased with the duration of illness reaching 90% after 10 days of illness. When cases were compared against pre-pandemic controls, the IgG gave excellent specificity (98–100%). For seroprevalence studies, InBios IgG had the best accuracy (90.8%) with 88.9% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. CONCLUSION: The serological assays are important adjuncts for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with persistent symptoms, especially in the second week of illness. The value of serological diagnostic tests is limited in the first week of illness and they provide additional value in seroprevalence studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELISA and CLIA platforms were comparable. BioMed Central 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9017961/ /pubmed/35439957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07361-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kundu, Debasree Gautam, Priyanka Dayanand, Divya Gunasekaran, Karthik Manesh, Abi Sebastian, Merylin Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P. Zachariah, Anand George, Tina Sathyendra, Sowmya Hansdak, Samuel G. Abraham, O. C. Iyadurai, Ramya Thangakunam, Balamugesh Gupta, Richa Karthik, Rajiv Moorthy, Mahesh Varghese, George M. The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 |
title | The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 |
title_full | The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 |
title_short | The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 |
title_sort | role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for covid-19 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07361-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kundudebasree theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT gautampriyanka theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT dayananddivya theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT gunasekarankarthik theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT maneshabi theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT sebastianmerylin theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT abhilashkundavarampp theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT zachariahanand theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT georgetina theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT sathyendrasowmya theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT hansdaksamuelg theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT abrahamoc theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT iyadurairamya theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT thangakunambalamugesh theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT guptaricha theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT karthikrajiv theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT moorthymahesh theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT varghesegeorgem theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT kundudebasree roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT gautampriyanka roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT dayananddivya roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT gunasekarankarthik roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT maneshabi roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT sebastianmerylin roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT abhilashkundavarampp roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT zachariahanand roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT georgetina roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT sathyendrasowmya roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT hansdaksamuelg roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT abrahamoc roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT iyadurairamya roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT thangakunambalamugesh roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT guptaricha roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT karthikrajiv roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT moorthymahesh roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 AT varghesegeorgem roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19 |