Cargando…

The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19

BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kundu, Debasree, Gautam, Priyanka, Dayanand, Divya, Gunasekaran, Karthik, Manesh, Abi, Sebastian, Merylin, Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P., Zachariah, Anand, George, Tina, Sathyendra, Sowmya, Hansdak, Samuel G., Abraham, O. C., Iyadurai, Ramya, Thangakunam, Balamugesh, Gupta, Richa, Karthik, Rajiv, Moorthy, Mahesh, Varghese, George M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07361-y
_version_ 1784688903794458624
author Kundu, Debasree
Gautam, Priyanka
Dayanand, Divya
Gunasekaran, Karthik
Manesh, Abi
Sebastian, Merylin
Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P.
Zachariah, Anand
George, Tina
Sathyendra, Sowmya
Hansdak, Samuel G.
Abraham, O. C.
Iyadurai, Ramya
Thangakunam, Balamugesh
Gupta, Richa
Karthik, Rajiv
Moorthy, Mahesh
Varghese, George M.
author_facet Kundu, Debasree
Gautam, Priyanka
Dayanand, Divya
Gunasekaran, Karthik
Manesh, Abi
Sebastian, Merylin
Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P.
Zachariah, Anand
George, Tina
Sathyendra, Sowmya
Hansdak, Samuel G.
Abraham, O. C.
Iyadurai, Ramya
Thangakunam, Balamugesh
Gupta, Richa
Karthik, Rajiv
Moorthy, Mahesh
Varghese, George M.
author_sort Kundu, Debasree
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with fever for > 5 days, admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital in South India, were enrolled prospectively between June and December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed patients were classified as cases, and patients with febrile illness with laboratory-confirmed alternative diagnosis and healthy participants were controls. All participants were tested with SCoV-2 Detect™ IgM ELISA kit and SCoV-2 Detect™ IgG ELISA kit (InBios International, Seattle, USA) (Inbios), SARS-CoV-2 Total and SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, USA) (Siemens), Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) (Roche), Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA) (Abbott), and Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorinS.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) (Liaison). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracies were compared. RESULTS: There were 303 participants: 153 cases and 150 controls. ELISA detecting anti-S protein antibody was more sensitive (88.9% for IgG and 86.3% for IgM) than the CLIAs (82.4% for total antibodies and 76.5–85.6% for IgG). Among CLIAs, Roche IgG was most sensitive (85.6%) followed by Abbott (83%) and Liaison (83%). Abbot had the best PPV (88.8%) and was more specific (89.3%) than Liaison (82%) and Roche (82%). Siemens IgG was less sensitive (76.5%) than Siemens Total (82.4%). The specificity of all the serological assays was modest (75–90%). Antibody test positivity increased with the duration of illness reaching 90% after 10 days of illness. When cases were compared against pre-pandemic controls, the IgG gave excellent specificity (98–100%). For seroprevalence studies, InBios IgG had the best accuracy (90.8%) with 88.9% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. CONCLUSION: The serological assays are important adjuncts for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with persistent symptoms, especially in the second week of illness. The value of serological diagnostic tests is limited in the first week of illness and they provide additional value in seroprevalence studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELISA and CLIA platforms were comparable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9017961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90179612022-04-20 The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19 Kundu, Debasree Gautam, Priyanka Dayanand, Divya Gunasekaran, Karthik Manesh, Abi Sebastian, Merylin Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P. Zachariah, Anand George, Tina Sathyendra, Sowmya Hansdak, Samuel G. Abraham, O. C. Iyadurai, Ramya Thangakunam, Balamugesh Gupta, Richa Karthik, Rajiv Moorthy, Mahesh Varghese, George M. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: The role and performance of various serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by testing COVID-19 cases and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with fever for > 5 days, admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital in South India, were enrolled prospectively between June and December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed patients were classified as cases, and patients with febrile illness with laboratory-confirmed alternative diagnosis and healthy participants were controls. All participants were tested with SCoV-2 Detect™ IgM ELISA kit and SCoV-2 Detect™ IgG ELISA kit (InBios International, Seattle, USA) (Inbios), SARS-CoV-2 Total and SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, USA) (Siemens), Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) (Roche), Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA) (Abbott), and Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorinS.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) (Liaison). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracies were compared. RESULTS: There were 303 participants: 153 cases and 150 controls. ELISA detecting anti-S protein antibody was more sensitive (88.9% for IgG and 86.3% for IgM) than the CLIAs (82.4% for total antibodies and 76.5–85.6% for IgG). Among CLIAs, Roche IgG was most sensitive (85.6%) followed by Abbott (83%) and Liaison (83%). Abbot had the best PPV (88.8%) and was more specific (89.3%) than Liaison (82%) and Roche (82%). Siemens IgG was less sensitive (76.5%) than Siemens Total (82.4%). The specificity of all the serological assays was modest (75–90%). Antibody test positivity increased with the duration of illness reaching 90% after 10 days of illness. When cases were compared against pre-pandemic controls, the IgG gave excellent specificity (98–100%). For seroprevalence studies, InBios IgG had the best accuracy (90.8%) with 88.9% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. CONCLUSION: The serological assays are important adjuncts for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with persistent symptoms, especially in the second week of illness. The value of serological diagnostic tests is limited in the first week of illness and they provide additional value in seroprevalence studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELISA and CLIA platforms were comparable. BioMed Central 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9017961/ /pubmed/35439957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07361-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kundu, Debasree
Gautam, Priyanka
Dayanand, Divya
Gunasekaran, Karthik
Manesh, Abi
Sebastian, Merylin
Abhilash, Kundavaram P. P.
Zachariah, Anand
George, Tina
Sathyendra, Sowmya
Hansdak, Samuel G.
Abraham, O. C.
Iyadurai, Ramya
Thangakunam, Balamugesh
Gupta, Richa
Karthik, Rajiv
Moorthy, Mahesh
Varghese, George M.
The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
title The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
title_full The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
title_fullStr The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
title_short The role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for COVID-19
title_sort role and diagnostic accuracy of serology for covid-19
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07361-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kundudebasree theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT gautampriyanka theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT dayananddivya theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT gunasekarankarthik theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT maneshabi theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT sebastianmerylin theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT abhilashkundavarampp theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT zachariahanand theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT georgetina theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT sathyendrasowmya theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT hansdaksamuelg theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT abrahamoc theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT iyadurairamya theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT thangakunambalamugesh theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT guptaricha theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT karthikrajiv theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT moorthymahesh theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT varghesegeorgem theroleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT kundudebasree roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT gautampriyanka roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT dayananddivya roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT gunasekarankarthik roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT maneshabi roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT sebastianmerylin roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT abhilashkundavarampp roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT zachariahanand roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT georgetina roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT sathyendrasowmya roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT hansdaksamuelg roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT abrahamoc roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT iyadurairamya roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT thangakunambalamugesh roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT guptaricha roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT karthikrajiv roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT moorthymahesh roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19
AT varghesegeorgem roleanddiagnosticaccuracyofserologyforcovid19