Cargando…
Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I
This article aimed to systematically review the published results of studies of psychophysiological mechanisms of posture maintenance and identify the key factors that influence the effectiveness of postural control. The recommendations of “Preferred Reporting Elements for Systematic Reviews and Met...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pleiades Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722020025 |
_version_ | 1784688904867151872 |
---|---|
author | Bazanova, O. M. Kovaleva, A. V. |
author_facet | Bazanova, O. M. Kovaleva, A. V. |
author_sort | Bazanova, O. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article aimed to systematically review the published results of studies of psychophysiological mechanisms of posture maintenance and identify the key factors that influence the effectiveness of postural control. The recommendations of “Preferred Reporting Elements for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes” (PRISMA) were followed for the review. The results were classified, taking into account the target psychophysiological mechanisms and factors affecting postural control. The article presents the theoretical and empirical results of the Russian scientific school of research on the role of support afferentation in the sensorimotor mechanisms of cognitive and postural functions. Due to the limited number of randomized studies found, it was impossible to make meta-analytic comparisons, so the literature analysis was carried out only qualitatively. Meanwhile, our systematic review provides promising information about possible relationships between stabilometric and psychological indicators of postural control, which have theoretical significance and application in the correction and training of posture control. However, more thorough research is needed to overcome the methodological shortcomings that we have encountered in our qualitative analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9017964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Pleiades Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90179642022-04-20 Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I Bazanova, O. M. Kovaleva, A. V. Hum Physiol Reviews This article aimed to systematically review the published results of studies of psychophysiological mechanisms of posture maintenance and identify the key factors that influence the effectiveness of postural control. The recommendations of “Preferred Reporting Elements for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes” (PRISMA) were followed for the review. The results were classified, taking into account the target psychophysiological mechanisms and factors affecting postural control. The article presents the theoretical and empirical results of the Russian scientific school of research on the role of support afferentation in the sensorimotor mechanisms of cognitive and postural functions. Due to the limited number of randomized studies found, it was impossible to make meta-analytic comparisons, so the literature analysis was carried out only qualitatively. Meanwhile, our systematic review provides promising information about possible relationships between stabilometric and psychological indicators of postural control, which have theoretical significance and application in the correction and training of posture control. However, more thorough research is needed to overcome the methodological shortcomings that we have encountered in our qualitative analysis. Pleiades Publishing 2022-04-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9017964/ /pubmed/35462944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722020025 Text en © Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2022, ISSN 0362-1197, Human Physiology, 2022, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 207–228. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2022.Russian Text © The Author(s), 2022, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2022, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 113–136. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Bazanova, O. M. Kovaleva, A. V. Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I |
title | Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I |
title_full | Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I |
title_fullStr | Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I |
title_short | Psychophysiological Indicators of Postural Control. Contribution of the Russian Scientific School. Part I |
title_sort | psychophysiological indicators of postural control. contribution of the russian scientific school. part i |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9017964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722020025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bazanovaom psychophysiologicalindicatorsofposturalcontrolcontributionoftherussianscientificschoolparti AT kovalevaav psychophysiologicalindicatorsofposturalcontrolcontributionoftherussianscientificschoolparti |