Cargando…

Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-tar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornienko, Kira, Siegel, Fabian, Borkowetz, Angelika, Hoffmann, Manuela A., Drerup, Martin, Lieb, Verena, Bruendl, Johannes, Höfner, Thomas, Cash, Hannes, von Hardenberg, Jost, Westhoff, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00478-2
_version_ 1784689048111022080
author Kornienko, Kira
Siegel, Fabian
Borkowetz, Angelika
Hoffmann, Manuela A.
Drerup, Martin
Lieb, Verena
Bruendl, Johannes
Höfner, Thomas
Cash, Hannes
von Hardenberg, Jost
Westhoff, Niklas
author_facet Kornienko, Kira
Siegel, Fabian
Borkowetz, Angelika
Hoffmann, Manuela A.
Drerup, Martin
Lieb, Verena
Bruendl, Johannes
Höfner, Thomas
Cash, Hannes
von Hardenberg, Jost
Westhoff, Niklas
author_sort Kornienko, Kira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-targeted (MRI-TB) and SB within real-world data using current AS guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted by a German prostate cancer (PCa) working group representing six tertiary referral centers and one outpatient practice. Men with PCa and at least one MRI-visible lesion according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 were included. Twenty different AS inclusion criteria of international guidelines were applied to calculate AS eligibility using either a SB or a combined MRI-TB and SB. Reasons for AS exclusion were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1941 patients with PCa, per guideline, 583–1112 patients with PCa in both MRI-TB and SB were available for analysis. Using SB, a median of 22.1% (range 6.4–72.4%) were eligible for AS. Using the combined approach, a median of 15% (range 1.7–68.3%) were eligible for AS. Addition of MRI-TB led to a 32.1% reduction of suitable patients. Besides Gleason Score upgrading, the maximum number of positive cores were the most frequent exclusion criterion. Variability in MRI and biopsy protocols potentially limit the results. CONCLUSIONS: Only a moderate number of patients with PCa can be monitored by AS to defer active treatment using current guidelines for inclusion in a real-world setting. By an additional MRI-TB, this number is markedly reduced. These results underline the need for a contemporary adjustment of AS inclusion criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9018419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90184192022-04-29 Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study Kornienko, Kira Siegel, Fabian Borkowetz, Angelika Hoffmann, Manuela A. Drerup, Martin Lieb, Verena Bruendl, Johannes Höfner, Thomas Cash, Hannes von Hardenberg, Jost Westhoff, Niklas Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-targeted (MRI-TB) and SB within real-world data using current AS guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted by a German prostate cancer (PCa) working group representing six tertiary referral centers and one outpatient practice. Men with PCa and at least one MRI-visible lesion according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 were included. Twenty different AS inclusion criteria of international guidelines were applied to calculate AS eligibility using either a SB or a combined MRI-TB and SB. Reasons for AS exclusion were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1941 patients with PCa, per guideline, 583–1112 patients with PCa in both MRI-TB and SB were available for analysis. Using SB, a median of 22.1% (range 6.4–72.4%) were eligible for AS. Using the combined approach, a median of 15% (range 1.7–68.3%) were eligible for AS. Addition of MRI-TB led to a 32.1% reduction of suitable patients. Besides Gleason Score upgrading, the maximum number of positive cores were the most frequent exclusion criterion. Variability in MRI and biopsy protocols potentially limit the results. CONCLUSIONS: Only a moderate number of patients with PCa can be monitored by AS to defer active treatment using current guidelines for inclusion in a real-world setting. By an additional MRI-TB, this number is markedly reduced. These results underline the need for a contemporary adjustment of AS inclusion criteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9018419/ /pubmed/34916584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00478-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kornienko, Kira
Siegel, Fabian
Borkowetz, Angelika
Hoffmann, Manuela A.
Drerup, Martin
Lieb, Verena
Bruendl, Johannes
Höfner, Thomas
Cash, Hannes
von Hardenberg, Jost
Westhoff, Niklas
Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
title Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
title_full Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
title_fullStr Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
title_short Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
title_sort active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00478-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kornienkokira activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT siegelfabian activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT borkowetzangelika activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT hoffmannmanuelaa activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT drerupmartin activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT liebverena activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT bruendljohannes activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT hofnerthomas activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT cashhannes activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT vonhardenbergjost activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT westhoffniklas activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy
AT activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy