Cargando…
Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study
BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-tar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00478-2 |
_version_ | 1784689048111022080 |
---|---|
author | Kornienko, Kira Siegel, Fabian Borkowetz, Angelika Hoffmann, Manuela A. Drerup, Martin Lieb, Verena Bruendl, Johannes Höfner, Thomas Cash, Hannes von Hardenberg, Jost Westhoff, Niklas |
author_facet | Kornienko, Kira Siegel, Fabian Borkowetz, Angelika Hoffmann, Manuela A. Drerup, Martin Lieb, Verena Bruendl, Johannes Höfner, Thomas Cash, Hannes von Hardenberg, Jost Westhoff, Niklas |
author_sort | Kornienko, Kira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-targeted (MRI-TB) and SB within real-world data using current AS guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted by a German prostate cancer (PCa) working group representing six tertiary referral centers and one outpatient practice. Men with PCa and at least one MRI-visible lesion according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 were included. Twenty different AS inclusion criteria of international guidelines were applied to calculate AS eligibility using either a SB or a combined MRI-TB and SB. Reasons for AS exclusion were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1941 patients with PCa, per guideline, 583–1112 patients with PCa in both MRI-TB and SB were available for analysis. Using SB, a median of 22.1% (range 6.4–72.4%) were eligible for AS. Using the combined approach, a median of 15% (range 1.7–68.3%) were eligible for AS. Addition of MRI-TB led to a 32.1% reduction of suitable patients. Besides Gleason Score upgrading, the maximum number of positive cores were the most frequent exclusion criterion. Variability in MRI and biopsy protocols potentially limit the results. CONCLUSIONS: Only a moderate number of patients with PCa can be monitored by AS to defer active treatment using current guidelines for inclusion in a real-world setting. By an additional MRI-TB, this number is markedly reduced. These results underline the need for a contemporary adjustment of AS inclusion criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9018419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90184192022-04-29 Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study Kornienko, Kira Siegel, Fabian Borkowetz, Angelika Hoffmann, Manuela A. Drerup, Martin Lieb, Verena Bruendl, Johannes Höfner, Thomas Cash, Hannes von Hardenberg, Jost Westhoff, Niklas Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-targeted (MRI-TB) and SB within real-world data using current AS guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted by a German prostate cancer (PCa) working group representing six tertiary referral centers and one outpatient practice. Men with PCa and at least one MRI-visible lesion according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 were included. Twenty different AS inclusion criteria of international guidelines were applied to calculate AS eligibility using either a SB or a combined MRI-TB and SB. Reasons for AS exclusion were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1941 patients with PCa, per guideline, 583–1112 patients with PCa in both MRI-TB and SB were available for analysis. Using SB, a median of 22.1% (range 6.4–72.4%) were eligible for AS. Using the combined approach, a median of 15% (range 1.7–68.3%) were eligible for AS. Addition of MRI-TB led to a 32.1% reduction of suitable patients. Besides Gleason Score upgrading, the maximum number of positive cores were the most frequent exclusion criterion. Variability in MRI and biopsy protocols potentially limit the results. CONCLUSIONS: Only a moderate number of patients with PCa can be monitored by AS to defer active treatment using current guidelines for inclusion in a real-world setting. By an additional MRI-TB, this number is markedly reduced. These results underline the need for a contemporary adjustment of AS inclusion criteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9018419/ /pubmed/34916584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00478-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kornienko, Kira Siegel, Fabian Borkowetz, Angelika Hoffmann, Manuela A. Drerup, Martin Lieb, Verena Bruendl, Johannes Höfner, Thomas Cash, Hannes von Hardenberg, Jost Westhoff, Niklas Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
title | Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
title_full | Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
title_fullStr | Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
title_short | Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
title_sort | active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00478-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornienkokira activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT siegelfabian activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT borkowetzangelika activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT hoffmannmanuelaa activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT drerupmartin activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT liebverena activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT bruendljohannes activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT hofnerthomas activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT cashhannes activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT vonhardenbergjost activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT westhoffniklas activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy AT activesurveillanceinclusioncriteriaunderscrutinyinmagneticresonanceimagingguidedprostatebiopsyamulticentercohortstudy |