Cargando…
Analysis of common methodological flaws in the highest cited e-cigarette epidemiology research
The prevalence of vaping, also known as using e-cigarettes, vapes and vape pens, has prompted a demand for reliable, evidence-based research. However, published literature on the topic of vaping often raises concerns, characterized by serious flaws and a failure to adhere to accepted scientific meth...
Autores principales: | Hajat, Cother, Stein, Emma, Selya, Arielle, Polosa, Riccardo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35325394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02967-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to: Analysis of common methodological flaws in the highest cited e-cigarette epidemiology research
por: Hajat, Cother, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A scoping review of studies on the health impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems
por: Hajat, Cother, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review
por: La Rosa, Giusy, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
E-cigarettes and smoking cessation: a critique of a New England Journal Medicine-commissioned case study
por: Polosa, Riccardo, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A double-edged sword: e-cigarettes, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS): reply
por: Polosa, Riccardo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)