Cargando…

Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers

Sexual selection in animals has been mostly studied in species in which males are signalers and females are choosers. However, in many species, females are (also) signalers. In species with non‐signaling females, virgin females are hypothesized to be less choosy than mated females, as virgins must m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zweerus, Naomi L., van Wijk, Michiel, Smallegange, Isabel M., Groot, Astrid T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8864
_version_ 1784689186744303616
author Zweerus, Naomi L.
van Wijk, Michiel
Smallegange, Isabel M.
Groot, Astrid T.
author_facet Zweerus, Naomi L.
van Wijk, Michiel
Smallegange, Isabel M.
Groot, Astrid T.
author_sort Zweerus, Naomi L.
collection PubMed
description Sexual selection in animals has been mostly studied in species in which males are signalers and females are choosers. However, in many species, females are (also) signalers. In species with non‐signaling females, virgin females are hypothesized to be less choosy than mated females, as virgins must mate to realize fitness and the number of available males is generally limited. Yet, when females signal to attract males, mate limitation can be overcome. We tested how virgin and mated females differ in their calling behavior, mating latency, and in mate choice, using the tobacco budworm Chloridea (Heliothis) virescens as an example for a species in which females are not only choosers but also signalers. We found that virgin females signaled longer than mated females, but virgin and mated signaling females were equally ready to mate, in contrast to non‐signaling females. However, we found that virgin signaling females showed weaker mate preference than mated females, which can be explained by the fact that females increase their fitness with multiple matings. Mated females may thus further increase their fitness by more stringent mate selection. We conclude that signaling is a crucial aspect to consider when studying female mate choice because signaling may affect the number of available mates to choose from.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9019137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90191372022-04-21 Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers Zweerus, Naomi L. van Wijk, Michiel Smallegange, Isabel M. Groot, Astrid T. Ecol Evol Research Articles Sexual selection in animals has been mostly studied in species in which males are signalers and females are choosers. However, in many species, females are (also) signalers. In species with non‐signaling females, virgin females are hypothesized to be less choosy than mated females, as virgins must mate to realize fitness and the number of available males is generally limited. Yet, when females signal to attract males, mate limitation can be overcome. We tested how virgin and mated females differ in their calling behavior, mating latency, and in mate choice, using the tobacco budworm Chloridea (Heliothis) virescens as an example for a species in which females are not only choosers but also signalers. We found that virgin females signaled longer than mated females, but virgin and mated signaling females were equally ready to mate, in contrast to non‐signaling females. However, we found that virgin signaling females showed weaker mate preference than mated females, which can be explained by the fact that females increase their fitness with multiple matings. Mated females may thus further increase their fitness by more stringent mate selection. We conclude that signaling is a crucial aspect to consider when studying female mate choice because signaling may affect the number of available mates to choose from. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9019137/ /pubmed/35462973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8864 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zweerus, Naomi L.
van Wijk, Michiel
Smallegange, Isabel M.
Groot, Astrid T.
Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
title Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
title_full Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
title_fullStr Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
title_full_unstemmed Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
title_short Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
title_sort mating status affects female choice when females are signalers
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8864
work_keys_str_mv AT zweerusnaomil matingstatusaffectsfemalechoicewhenfemalesaresignalers
AT vanwijkmichiel matingstatusaffectsfemalechoicewhenfemalesaresignalers
AT smallegangeisabelm matingstatusaffectsfemalechoicewhenfemalesaresignalers
AT grootastridt matingstatusaffectsfemalechoicewhenfemalesaresignalers