Cargando…

Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist

BACKGROUND: Questions remain regarding the traditional protocols used in rehabilitation and clearance for return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the impact on injury rates after return to sports by developing and validating a Safer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadley, Christopher J., Rao, Somnath, Tjoumakaris, Fotios P., Ciccotti, Michael G., Dodson, Christopher C., Marchetto, Paul A., Hammoud, Sommer, Cohen, Steven B., Freedman, Kevin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221090412
_version_ 1784689241783009280
author Hadley, Christopher J.
Rao, Somnath
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Dodson, Christopher C.
Marchetto, Paul A.
Hammoud, Sommer
Cohen, Steven B.
Freedman, Kevin B.
author_facet Hadley, Christopher J.
Rao, Somnath
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Dodson, Christopher C.
Marchetto, Paul A.
Hammoud, Sommer
Cohen, Steven B.
Freedman, Kevin B.
author_sort Hadley, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Questions remain regarding the traditional protocols used in rehabilitation and clearance for return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the impact on injury rates after return to sports by developing and validating a Safer Return to Play Following ACL Reconstruction Checklist consisting of subjective and objective functional tests that can be quickly and easily implemented into a sports medicine practice. It was hypothesized that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to sports would experience lower rates of ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries at a 2-year follow-up as compared with patients who returned to play before completing the checklist. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: First, a systematic review was performed to generate a list of the most common outcome measures used to assess return to play after ACLR. To refine our checklist, we conducted a survey with an expert panel of 10 medical professionals utilizing the Delphi technique. After the creation of the checklist, validation was performed by prospectively evaluating patients who had undergone ACLR for injury of the ipsilateral or contralateral knee, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: After our systematic review of 60 studies, 7 criteria were included in the final checklist. During the period studied, October 2014 to December 2017, a total of 222 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. At a minimum 2 years of follow-up, there were 146 patients who successfully passed the checklist and 38 who did not. Overall, 24 (16.4%) patients who had passed the checklist sustained an injury to either knee, as compared with 10 (26.3%) from the group that did not pass the checklist (P = .162). Of the group that passed the checklist, 8 (5.5%) patients sustained an injury to the ipsilateral knee, as compared with 7 (18.4%) in the group that did not pass (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Prospective validation of our checklist demonstrated that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to play experienced a significantly lower incidence of ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury as compared with patients who did not pass the checklist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9019333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90193332022-04-21 Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist Hadley, Christopher J. Rao, Somnath Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Ciccotti, Michael G. Dodson, Christopher C. Marchetto, Paul A. Hammoud, Sommer Cohen, Steven B. Freedman, Kevin B. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Questions remain regarding the traditional protocols used in rehabilitation and clearance for return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the impact on injury rates after return to sports by developing and validating a Safer Return to Play Following ACL Reconstruction Checklist consisting of subjective and objective functional tests that can be quickly and easily implemented into a sports medicine practice. It was hypothesized that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to sports would experience lower rates of ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries at a 2-year follow-up as compared with patients who returned to play before completing the checklist. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: First, a systematic review was performed to generate a list of the most common outcome measures used to assess return to play after ACLR. To refine our checklist, we conducted a survey with an expert panel of 10 medical professionals utilizing the Delphi technique. After the creation of the checklist, validation was performed by prospectively evaluating patients who had undergone ACLR for injury of the ipsilateral or contralateral knee, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: After our systematic review of 60 studies, 7 criteria were included in the final checklist. During the period studied, October 2014 to December 2017, a total of 222 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. At a minimum 2 years of follow-up, there were 146 patients who successfully passed the checklist and 38 who did not. Overall, 24 (16.4%) patients who had passed the checklist sustained an injury to either knee, as compared with 10 (26.3%) from the group that did not pass the checklist (P = .162). Of the group that passed the checklist, 8 (5.5%) patients sustained an injury to the ipsilateral knee, as compared with 7 (18.4%) in the group that did not pass (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Prospective validation of our checklist demonstrated that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to play experienced a significantly lower incidence of ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury as compared with patients who did not pass the checklist. SAGE Publications 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9019333/ /pubmed/35464900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221090412 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Hadley, Christopher J.
Rao, Somnath
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Dodson, Christopher C.
Marchetto, Paul A.
Hammoud, Sommer
Cohen, Steven B.
Freedman, Kevin B.
Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist
title Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist
title_full Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist
title_fullStr Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist
title_full_unstemmed Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist
title_short Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist
title_sort safer return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of a return-to-play checklist
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221090412
work_keys_str_mv AT hadleychristopherj saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT raosomnath saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT tjoumakarisfotiosp saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT ciccottimichaelg saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT dodsonchristopherc saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT marchettopaula saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT hammoudsommer saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT cohenstevenb saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist
AT freedmankevinb saferreturntoplayafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionevaluationofareturntoplaychecklist