Cargando…
Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
The purpose of this project was to evaluate differences between groups and device configurations for emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Three groups of adults participated: 1) listeners with normal hearing with no history of device use, 2) hearing aid candidates with or without hearing aid ex...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165221083091 |
_version_ | 1784689258221535232 |
---|---|
author | Tawdrous, Marina M. D'Onofrio, Kristen L. Gifford, René Picou, Erin M. |
author_facet | Tawdrous, Marina M. D'Onofrio, Kristen L. Gifford, René Picou, Erin M. |
author_sort | Tawdrous, Marina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this project was to evaluate differences between groups and device configurations for emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Three groups of adults participated: 1) listeners with normal hearing with no history of device use, 2) hearing aid candidates with or without hearing aid experience, and 3) bimodal cochlear-implant listeners with at least 6 months of implant use. Participants (n = 18 in each group) rated valence and arousal of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant non-speech sounds. Listeners with normal hearing rated sounds without hearing devices. Hearing aid candidates rated sounds while using one or two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners rated sounds while using a hearing aid alone, a cochlear implant alone, or the hearing aid and cochlear implant simultaneously. Analysis revealed significant differences between groups in ratings of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli; ratings from hearing aid candidates and bimodal cochlear-implant listeners were less extreme (less pleasant and less unpleasant) than were ratings from listeners with normal hearing. Hearing aid candidates’ ratings were similar with one and two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners’ ratings of valence were higher (more pleasant) in the configuration without a hearing aid (implant only) than in the two configurations with a hearing aid (alone or with an implant). These data support the need for further investigation into hearing device optimization to improve emotional responses to non-speech sounds for adults with hearing loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9019384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90193842022-04-21 Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners Tawdrous, Marina M. D'Onofrio, Kristen L. Gifford, René Picou, Erin M. Trends Hear Original Article The purpose of this project was to evaluate differences between groups and device configurations for emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Three groups of adults participated: 1) listeners with normal hearing with no history of device use, 2) hearing aid candidates with or without hearing aid experience, and 3) bimodal cochlear-implant listeners with at least 6 months of implant use. Participants (n = 18 in each group) rated valence and arousal of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant non-speech sounds. Listeners with normal hearing rated sounds without hearing devices. Hearing aid candidates rated sounds while using one or two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners rated sounds while using a hearing aid alone, a cochlear implant alone, or the hearing aid and cochlear implant simultaneously. Analysis revealed significant differences between groups in ratings of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli; ratings from hearing aid candidates and bimodal cochlear-implant listeners were less extreme (less pleasant and less unpleasant) than were ratings from listeners with normal hearing. Hearing aid candidates’ ratings were similar with one and two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners’ ratings of valence were higher (more pleasant) in the configuration without a hearing aid (implant only) than in the two configurations with a hearing aid (alone or with an implant). These data support the need for further investigation into hearing device optimization to improve emotional responses to non-speech sounds for adults with hearing loss. SAGE Publications 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9019384/ /pubmed/35435773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165221083091 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tawdrous, Marina M. D'Onofrio, Kristen L. Gifford, René Picou, Erin M. Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners |
title | Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal
Cochlear-Implant Listeners |
title_full | Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal
Cochlear-Implant Listeners |
title_fullStr | Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal
Cochlear-Implant Listeners |
title_full_unstemmed | Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal
Cochlear-Implant Listeners |
title_short | Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal
Cochlear-Implant Listeners |
title_sort | emotional responses to non-speech sounds for hearing-aid and bimodal
cochlear-implant listeners |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165221083091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tawdrousmarinam emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners AT donofriokristenl emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners AT giffordrene emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners AT picouerinm emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners |