Cargando…

Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners

The purpose of this project was to evaluate differences between groups and device configurations for emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Three groups of adults participated: 1) listeners with normal hearing with no history of device use, 2) hearing aid candidates with or without hearing aid ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tawdrous, Marina M., D'Onofrio, Kristen L., Gifford, René, Picou, Erin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165221083091
_version_ 1784689258221535232
author Tawdrous, Marina M.
D'Onofrio, Kristen L.
Gifford, René
Picou, Erin M.
author_facet Tawdrous, Marina M.
D'Onofrio, Kristen L.
Gifford, René
Picou, Erin M.
author_sort Tawdrous, Marina M.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this project was to evaluate differences between groups and device configurations for emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Three groups of adults participated: 1) listeners with normal hearing with no history of device use, 2) hearing aid candidates with or without hearing aid experience, and 3) bimodal cochlear-implant listeners with at least 6 months of implant use. Participants (n = 18 in each group) rated valence and arousal of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant non-speech sounds. Listeners with normal hearing rated sounds without hearing devices. Hearing aid candidates rated sounds while using one or two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners rated sounds while using a hearing aid alone, a cochlear implant alone, or the hearing aid and cochlear implant simultaneously. Analysis revealed significant differences between groups in ratings of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli; ratings from hearing aid candidates and bimodal cochlear-implant listeners were less extreme (less pleasant and less unpleasant) than were ratings from listeners with normal hearing. Hearing aid candidates’ ratings were similar with one and two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners’ ratings of valence were higher (more pleasant) in the configuration without a hearing aid (implant only) than in the two configurations with a hearing aid (alone or with an implant). These data support the need for further investigation into hearing device optimization to improve emotional responses to non-speech sounds for adults with hearing loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9019384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90193842022-04-21 Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners Tawdrous, Marina M. D'Onofrio, Kristen L. Gifford, René Picou, Erin M. Trends Hear Original Article The purpose of this project was to evaluate differences between groups and device configurations for emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Three groups of adults participated: 1) listeners with normal hearing with no history of device use, 2) hearing aid candidates with or without hearing aid experience, and 3) bimodal cochlear-implant listeners with at least 6 months of implant use. Participants (n = 18 in each group) rated valence and arousal of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant non-speech sounds. Listeners with normal hearing rated sounds without hearing devices. Hearing aid candidates rated sounds while using one or two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners rated sounds while using a hearing aid alone, a cochlear implant alone, or the hearing aid and cochlear implant simultaneously. Analysis revealed significant differences between groups in ratings of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli; ratings from hearing aid candidates and bimodal cochlear-implant listeners were less extreme (less pleasant and less unpleasant) than were ratings from listeners with normal hearing. Hearing aid candidates’ ratings were similar with one and two hearing aids. Bimodal cochlear-implant listeners’ ratings of valence were higher (more pleasant) in the configuration without a hearing aid (implant only) than in the two configurations with a hearing aid (alone or with an implant). These data support the need for further investigation into hearing device optimization to improve emotional responses to non-speech sounds for adults with hearing loss. SAGE Publications 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9019384/ /pubmed/35435773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165221083091 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Tawdrous, Marina M.
D'Onofrio, Kristen L.
Gifford, René
Picou, Erin M.
Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_full Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_fullStr Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_short Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_sort emotional responses to non-speech sounds for hearing-aid and bimodal cochlear-implant listeners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35435773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165221083091
work_keys_str_mv AT tawdrousmarinam emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners
AT donofriokristenl emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners
AT giffordrene emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners
AT picouerinm emotionalresponsestononspeechsoundsforhearingaidandbimodalcochlearimplantlisteners