Cargando…

Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: The 2019–2020 pandemic COVID-19 has become a global health crisis. While many recent studies on COVID-19 pandemic have focused on disease epidemiology and psychological status of patients, few have explored the multi-facet influential factors or combined perspectives from both the pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Juan, Wang, Anni, Liu, Lei, Chen, Xue, Bai, Xiaoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.766036
_version_ 1784689290661330944
author Li, Juan
Wang, Anni
Liu, Lei
Chen, Xue
Bai, Xiaoling
author_facet Li, Juan
Wang, Anni
Liu, Lei
Chen, Xue
Bai, Xiaoling
author_sort Li, Juan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The 2019–2020 pandemic COVID-19 has become a global health crisis. While many recent studies on COVID-19 pandemic have focused on disease epidemiology and psychological status of patients, few have explored the multi-facet influential factors or combined perspectives from both the patients and healthcare workers. The purposes of this study were to: analyze the influencing factors of psychological distress of COVID-19 patients; and describe the experience of healthcare workers relieving psychological distress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study uses a mixed-method cross-sectional design, including a quantitative study and a qualitative study, targeting two populations: COVID-19 patient and health workers, respectively. In the quantitative part, we recruited a convenience sample of patients with COVID-19 from five hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei Province from 10 to 15 April, 2020. Besides, we collected data by using participants’ socio-demographic information sheet, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10, the Herth Hope Index, the Distress Thermometer, the Revised Chinese Version of Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale, and the Chinese Version of Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale. In the qualitative part, the participants were healthcare workers involved in medical aid missions in Hubei Province, China. Meanwhile, we used sampling with convenient and purposive, data collection with a semi-structured online video interview, and text transcription with Colaizzi’s phenomenological method. RESULTS: The results reveal that 25.7% of patients reported higher level of psychological distress (n = 31, scoring ≥4). After controlling the sociodemographic variables, only severity of COVID-19 (β = 0.282, P = 0.025) and uncertainty in illness (β = 0.345, P = 0.007) shown significant effect on psychological distress in the regression model (F = 10.862, R(2) = 0.222, P < 0.001). The experience of healthcare workers emerged five themes: Particularly needed psychological care, Manifestation of negative emotion, Manifestation of proactive adaptation, Strategies relieving psychological distress, and gains of healthcare workers after delivering effective psychological care. CONCLUSION: The 25.7% of patients with COVID-19 still suffered from psychological distress, which should receive timely attention from healthcare workers. And the severity of the disease and disease uncertainty have a significant impact on distress. It is critical to train the healthcare workers on detecting the different manifestation of psychological distress, offering timely disease related information, and applying communication strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9019475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90194752022-04-21 Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study Li, Juan Wang, Anni Liu, Lei Chen, Xue Bai, Xiaoling Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The 2019–2020 pandemic COVID-19 has become a global health crisis. While many recent studies on COVID-19 pandemic have focused on disease epidemiology and psychological status of patients, few have explored the multi-facet influential factors or combined perspectives from both the patients and healthcare workers. The purposes of this study were to: analyze the influencing factors of psychological distress of COVID-19 patients; and describe the experience of healthcare workers relieving psychological distress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study uses a mixed-method cross-sectional design, including a quantitative study and a qualitative study, targeting two populations: COVID-19 patient and health workers, respectively. In the quantitative part, we recruited a convenience sample of patients with COVID-19 from five hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei Province from 10 to 15 April, 2020. Besides, we collected data by using participants’ socio-demographic information sheet, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10, the Herth Hope Index, the Distress Thermometer, the Revised Chinese Version of Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale, and the Chinese Version of Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale. In the qualitative part, the participants were healthcare workers involved in medical aid missions in Hubei Province, China. Meanwhile, we used sampling with convenient and purposive, data collection with a semi-structured online video interview, and text transcription with Colaizzi’s phenomenological method. RESULTS: The results reveal that 25.7% of patients reported higher level of psychological distress (n = 31, scoring ≥4). After controlling the sociodemographic variables, only severity of COVID-19 (β = 0.282, P = 0.025) and uncertainty in illness (β = 0.345, P = 0.007) shown significant effect on psychological distress in the regression model (F = 10.862, R(2) = 0.222, P < 0.001). The experience of healthcare workers emerged five themes: Particularly needed psychological care, Manifestation of negative emotion, Manifestation of proactive adaptation, Strategies relieving psychological distress, and gains of healthcare workers after delivering effective psychological care. CONCLUSION: The 25.7% of patients with COVID-19 still suffered from psychological distress, which should receive timely attention from healthcare workers. And the severity of the disease and disease uncertainty have a significant impact on distress. It is critical to train the healthcare workers on detecting the different manifestation of psychological distress, offering timely disease related information, and applying communication strategies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9019475/ /pubmed/35465515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.766036 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Wang, Liu, Chen and Bai. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Li, Juan
Wang, Anni
Liu, Lei
Chen, Xue
Bai, Xiaoling
Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study
title Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Caring for Psychological Distress of Patients With COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort caring for psychological distress of patients with covid-19: a mixed-method cross-sectional study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.766036
work_keys_str_mv AT lijuan caringforpsychologicaldistressofpatientswithcovid19amixedmethodcrosssectionalstudy
AT wanganni caringforpsychologicaldistressofpatientswithcovid19amixedmethodcrosssectionalstudy
AT liulei caringforpsychologicaldistressofpatientswithcovid19amixedmethodcrosssectionalstudy
AT chenxue caringforpsychologicaldistressofpatientswithcovid19amixedmethodcrosssectionalstudy
AT baixiaoling caringforpsychologicaldistressofpatientswithcovid19amixedmethodcrosssectionalstudy