Cargando…

A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions

Light intensity is highly heterogeneous in nature, and plants have evolved a series of strategies to acclimate to dynamic light due to their immobile lifestyles. However, it is still unknown whether there are differences in photoprotective mechanisms among different light-demanding plants in respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shuang, Sheng-Pu, Zhang, Jin-Yan, Cun, Zhu, Wu, Hong-Min, Hong, Jie, Chen, Jun-Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.819843
_version_ 1784689291613437952
author Shuang, Sheng-Pu
Zhang, Jin-Yan
Cun, Zhu
Wu, Hong-Min
Hong, Jie
Chen, Jun-Wen
author_facet Shuang, Sheng-Pu
Zhang, Jin-Yan
Cun, Zhu
Wu, Hong-Min
Hong, Jie
Chen, Jun-Wen
author_sort Shuang, Sheng-Pu
collection PubMed
description Light intensity is highly heterogeneous in nature, and plants have evolved a series of strategies to acclimate to dynamic light due to their immobile lifestyles. However, it is still unknown whether there are differences in photoprotective mechanisms among different light-demanding plants in response to dynamic light, and thus the role of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), electron transport, and light energy allocation of photosystems in photoprotection needs to be further understood in different light-demanding plants. The activities of photosystem II (PSII) and photosystem I (PSI) in shade-tolerant species Panax notoginseng, intermediate species Polygonatum kingianum, and sun-demanding species Erigeron breviscapus were comparatively measured to elucidate photoprotection mechanisms in different light-demanding plants under dynamic light. The results showed that the NPQ and PSII maximum efficiency (F(v)′/F(m)′) of E. breviscapus were higher than the other two species under dynamic high light. Meanwhile, cyclic electron flow (CEF) of sun plants is larger under transient high light conditions since the slope of post-illumination, P700 dark reduction rate, and plastoquinone (PQ) pool were greater. NPQ was more active and CEF was initiated more readily in shade plants than the two other species under transient light. Moreover, sun plants processed higher quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ(PSII)), quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion [Y(I)], and quantum yield of non-photochemical energy dissipation due to acceptor side limitation (Y(NA), while the constitutive thermal dissipation and fluorescence (Φ(f,d)) and quantum yield of non-photochemical energy dissipation due to donor side limitation [Y(ND)] of PSI were higher in shade plants. These results suggest that sun plants had higher NPQ and CEF for photoprotection under transient high light and mainly allocated light energy through Φ(PSII) and Φ(NPQ), while shade plants had a higher Φ(f,d) and a larger heat dissipation efficiency of PSI donor. Overall, it has been demonstrated that the photochemical efficiency and photoprotective capacity are greater in sun plants under transient dynamic light, while shade plants are more sensitive to transient dynamic light.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9019478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90194782022-04-21 A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions Shuang, Sheng-Pu Zhang, Jin-Yan Cun, Zhu Wu, Hong-Min Hong, Jie Chen, Jun-Wen Front Plant Sci Plant Science Light intensity is highly heterogeneous in nature, and plants have evolved a series of strategies to acclimate to dynamic light due to their immobile lifestyles. However, it is still unknown whether there are differences in photoprotective mechanisms among different light-demanding plants in response to dynamic light, and thus the role of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), electron transport, and light energy allocation of photosystems in photoprotection needs to be further understood in different light-demanding plants. The activities of photosystem II (PSII) and photosystem I (PSI) in shade-tolerant species Panax notoginseng, intermediate species Polygonatum kingianum, and sun-demanding species Erigeron breviscapus were comparatively measured to elucidate photoprotection mechanisms in different light-demanding plants under dynamic light. The results showed that the NPQ and PSII maximum efficiency (F(v)′/F(m)′) of E. breviscapus were higher than the other two species under dynamic high light. Meanwhile, cyclic electron flow (CEF) of sun plants is larger under transient high light conditions since the slope of post-illumination, P700 dark reduction rate, and plastoquinone (PQ) pool were greater. NPQ was more active and CEF was initiated more readily in shade plants than the two other species under transient light. Moreover, sun plants processed higher quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ(PSII)), quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion [Y(I)], and quantum yield of non-photochemical energy dissipation due to acceptor side limitation (Y(NA), while the constitutive thermal dissipation and fluorescence (Φ(f,d)) and quantum yield of non-photochemical energy dissipation due to donor side limitation [Y(ND)] of PSI were higher in shade plants. These results suggest that sun plants had higher NPQ and CEF for photoprotection under transient high light and mainly allocated light energy through Φ(PSII) and Φ(NPQ), while shade plants had a higher Φ(f,d) and a larger heat dissipation efficiency of PSI donor. Overall, it has been demonstrated that the photochemical efficiency and photoprotective capacity are greater in sun plants under transient dynamic light, while shade plants are more sensitive to transient dynamic light. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9019478/ /pubmed/35463455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.819843 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shuang, Zhang, Cun, Wu, Hong and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Shuang, Sheng-Pu
Zhang, Jin-Yan
Cun, Zhu
Wu, Hong-Min
Hong, Jie
Chen, Jun-Wen
A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions
title A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions
title_full A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions
title_fullStr A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions
title_short A Comparison of Photoprotective Mechanism in Different Light-Demanding Plants Under Dynamic Light Conditions
title_sort comparison of photoprotective mechanism in different light-demanding plants under dynamic light conditions
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9019478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35463455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.819843
work_keys_str_mv AT shuangshengpu acomparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT zhangjinyan acomparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT cunzhu acomparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT wuhongmin acomparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT hongjie acomparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT chenjunwen acomparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT shuangshengpu comparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT zhangjinyan comparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT cunzhu comparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT wuhongmin comparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT hongjie comparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions
AT chenjunwen comparisonofphotoprotectivemechanismindifferentlightdemandingplantsunderdynamiclightconditions