Cargando…

A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective

BACKGROUND: The application of virtual reality (VR) and robotic devices in neuromotor rehabilitation has provided promising evidence in terms of efficacy, so far. Usability evaluations of these technologies have been conducted extensively, but no overviews on this topic have been reported yet. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanatta, Francesco, Giardini, Anna, Pierobon, Antonia, D’Addario, Marco, Steca, Patrizia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w
_version_ 1784689462041640960
author Zanatta, Francesco
Giardini, Anna
Pierobon, Antonia
D’Addario, Marco
Steca, Patrizia
author_facet Zanatta, Francesco
Giardini, Anna
Pierobon, Antonia
D’Addario, Marco
Steca, Patrizia
author_sort Zanatta, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The application of virtual reality (VR) and robotic devices in neuromotor rehabilitation has provided promising evidence in terms of efficacy, so far. Usability evaluations of these technologies have been conducted extensively, but no overviews on this topic have been reported yet. METHODS: A systematic review of the studies on patients' and healthcare professionals' perspective through searching of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO (2000 to 2021) was conducted. Descriptive data regarding the study design, participants, technological devices, interventions, and quantitative and qualitative usability evaluations were extracted and meta-synthetized. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies were included. VR devices were perceived as having good usability and as a tool promoting patients' engagement and motivation during the treatment, as well as providing strong potential for customized rehabilitation sessions. By contrast, they suffered from the effect of learnability and were judged as potentially requiring more mental effort. Robotics implementation received positive feedback along with high satisfaction and perceived safety throughout the treatment. Robot-assisted rehabilitation was considered useful as it supported increased treatment intensity and contributed to improved patients' physical independence and psychosocial well-being. Technical and design-related issues may limit the applicability making the treatment difficult and physically straining. Moreover, cognitive and communication deficits were remarked as potential barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, VR and robotic devices have been perceived usable so far, reflecting good acceptance in neuromotor rehabilitation programs. The limitations raised by the participants should be considered to further improve devices applicability and maximise technological rehabilitation effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration ref. CRD42021224141. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9020115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90201152022-04-21 A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective Zanatta, Francesco Giardini, Anna Pierobon, Antonia D’Addario, Marco Steca, Patrizia BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The application of virtual reality (VR) and robotic devices in neuromotor rehabilitation has provided promising evidence in terms of efficacy, so far. Usability evaluations of these technologies have been conducted extensively, but no overviews on this topic have been reported yet. METHODS: A systematic review of the studies on patients' and healthcare professionals' perspective through searching of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO (2000 to 2021) was conducted. Descriptive data regarding the study design, participants, technological devices, interventions, and quantitative and qualitative usability evaluations were extracted and meta-synthetized. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies were included. VR devices were perceived as having good usability and as a tool promoting patients' engagement and motivation during the treatment, as well as providing strong potential for customized rehabilitation sessions. By contrast, they suffered from the effect of learnability and were judged as potentially requiring more mental effort. Robotics implementation received positive feedback along with high satisfaction and perceived safety throughout the treatment. Robot-assisted rehabilitation was considered useful as it supported increased treatment intensity and contributed to improved patients' physical independence and psychosocial well-being. Technical and design-related issues may limit the applicability making the treatment difficult and physically straining. Moreover, cognitive and communication deficits were remarked as potential barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, VR and robotic devices have been perceived usable so far, reflecting good acceptance in neuromotor rehabilitation programs. The limitations raised by the participants should be considered to further improve devices applicability and maximise technological rehabilitation effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration ref. CRD42021224141. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w. BioMed Central 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9020115/ /pubmed/35443710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zanatta, Francesco
Giardini, Anna
Pierobon, Antonia
D’Addario, Marco
Steca, Patrizia
A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
title A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
title_full A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
title_fullStr A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
title_short A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
title_sort systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zanattafrancesco asystematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT giardinianna asystematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT pierobonantonia asystematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT daddariomarco asystematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT stecapatrizia asystematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT zanattafrancesco systematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT giardinianna systematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT pierobonantonia systematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT daddariomarco systematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT stecapatrizia systematicreviewontheusabilityofroboticandvirtualrealitydevicesinneuromotorrehabilitationpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspective