Cargando…

Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland

Objectives: Air pollution health risk assessments (AP-HRAs) provide a method to quantify health effects for entire populations. In Switzerland, AP-HRAs are included in Swiss assessments for Transport Externalities (STEs), ordered by public authorities since the 1990s. This study aimed to describe th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro, Alberto, Röösli, Martin, de Hoogh, Kees, Kappeler, Ron, Kutlar Joss, Meltem, Vienneau, Danielle, Künzli, Nino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2022.1604431
_version_ 1784689500206661632
author Castro, Alberto
Röösli, Martin
de Hoogh, Kees
Kappeler, Ron
Kutlar Joss, Meltem
Vienneau, Danielle
Künzli, Nino
author_facet Castro, Alberto
Röösli, Martin
de Hoogh, Kees
Kappeler, Ron
Kutlar Joss, Meltem
Vienneau, Danielle
Künzli, Nino
author_sort Castro, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Air pollution health risk assessments (AP-HRAs) provide a method to quantify health effects for entire populations. In Switzerland, AP-HRAs are included in Swiss assessments for Transport Externalities (STEs), ordered by public authorities since the 1990s. This study aimed to describe the differences among national and international AP-HRAs for Switzerland. Methods: We compared input data, approaches and results across AP-HRAs over time. Results and input data for each AP-HRA were expressed as a ratio compared to the most recent STE (in most cases STE-2010). Results: Substantial variation across AP-HRAs was found. For all-cause adult mortality attributed to particulate matter (the most frequent outcome-pollutant pair), the ratio in HRAs oscillated from 0.40 to 2.09 (times the STE-2010 value). Regarding input data, the ratio ranged from 0.69 to 1.26 for population exposure, from 0 to 1.81 for counterfactual scenario, from 0.96 to 1.13 for concentration-response function and from 1.03 to 1.13 for baseline health data. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that methods matter for AP-HRAs. Transparent and possibly standardized reporting of key input data and assumptions should be promoted to facilitate comparison of AP-HRAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9020261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90202612022-04-21 Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland Castro, Alberto Röösli, Martin de Hoogh, Kees Kappeler, Ron Kutlar Joss, Meltem Vienneau, Danielle Künzli, Nino Public Health Rev Public Health Archive Objectives: Air pollution health risk assessments (AP-HRAs) provide a method to quantify health effects for entire populations. In Switzerland, AP-HRAs are included in Swiss assessments for Transport Externalities (STEs), ordered by public authorities since the 1990s. This study aimed to describe the differences among national and international AP-HRAs for Switzerland. Methods: We compared input data, approaches and results across AP-HRAs over time. Results and input data for each AP-HRA were expressed as a ratio compared to the most recent STE (in most cases STE-2010). Results: Substantial variation across AP-HRAs was found. For all-cause adult mortality attributed to particulate matter (the most frequent outcome-pollutant pair), the ratio in HRAs oscillated from 0.40 to 2.09 (times the STE-2010 value). Regarding input data, the ratio ranged from 0.69 to 1.26 for population exposure, from 0 to 1.81 for counterfactual scenario, from 0.96 to 1.13 for concentration-response function and from 1.03 to 1.13 for baseline health data. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that methods matter for AP-HRAs. Transparent and possibly standardized reporting of key input data and assumptions should be promoted to facilitate comparison of AP-HRAs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9020261/ /pubmed/35465140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2022.1604431 Text en Copyright © 2022 Castro, Röösli, de Hoogh, Kappeler, Kutlar Joss, Vienneau and Künzli. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.PHR is edited by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) in a partnership with the Association of Schools of Public Health of the European Region (ASPHER)+
spellingShingle Public Health Archive
Castro, Alberto
Röösli, Martin
de Hoogh, Kees
Kappeler, Ron
Kutlar Joss, Meltem
Vienneau, Danielle
Künzli, Nino
Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland
title Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland
title_full Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland
title_fullStr Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland
title_short Methods Matter: A Comparative Review of Health Risk Assessments for Ambient Air Pollution in Switzerland
title_sort methods matter: a comparative review of health risk assessments for ambient air pollution in switzerland
topic Public Health Archive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35465140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2022.1604431
work_keys_str_mv AT castroalberto methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland
AT rooslimartin methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland
AT dehooghkees methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland
AT kappelerron methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland
AT kutlarjossmeltem methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland
AT vienneaudanielle methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland
AT kunzlinino methodsmatteracomparativereviewofhealthriskassessmentsforambientairpollutioninswitzerland