Cargando…

Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy is the first-line treatment option for Parkinson’s disease, and levodopa is considered the most effective drug for managing motor symptoms. However, side effects such as motor fluctuation and dyskinesia have been associated with levodopa treatment. For these conditions, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujikawa, Joji, Morigaki, Ryoma, Yamamoto, Nobuaki, Oda, Teruo, Nakanishi, Hiroshi, Izumi, Yuishin, Takagi, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.807909
_version_ 1784689524158234624
author Fujikawa, Joji
Morigaki, Ryoma
Yamamoto, Nobuaki
Oda, Teruo
Nakanishi, Hiroshi
Izumi, Yuishin
Takagi, Yasushi
author_facet Fujikawa, Joji
Morigaki, Ryoma
Yamamoto, Nobuaki
Oda, Teruo
Nakanishi, Hiroshi
Izumi, Yuishin
Takagi, Yasushi
author_sort Fujikawa, Joji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy is the first-line treatment option for Parkinson’s disease, and levodopa is considered the most effective drug for managing motor symptoms. However, side effects such as motor fluctuation and dyskinesia have been associated with levodopa treatment. For these conditions, alternative therapies, including invasive and non-invasive medical devices, may be helpful. This review sheds light on current progress in the development of devices to alleviate motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. METHODS: We first conducted a narrative literature review to obtain an overview of current invasive and non-invasive medical devices and thereafter performed a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these devices. RESULTS: Our review revealed different characteristics of each device and their effectiveness for motor symptoms. Although invasive medical devices are usually highly effective, surgical procedures can be burdensome for patients and have serious side effects. In contrast, non-pharmacological/non-surgical devices have fewer complications. RCTs of non-invasive devices, especially non-invasive brain stimulation and mechanical peripheral stimulation devices, have proven effectiveness on motor symptoms. Nearly no non-invasive devices have yet received Food and Drug Administration certification or a CE mark. CONCLUSION: Invasive and non-invasive medical devices have unique characteristics, and several RCTs have been conducted for each device. Invasive devices are more effective, while non-invasive devices are less effective and have lower hurdles and risks. It is important to understand the characteristics of each device and capitalize on these.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9020378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90203782022-04-21 Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials Fujikawa, Joji Morigaki, Ryoma Yamamoto, Nobuaki Oda, Teruo Nakanishi, Hiroshi Izumi, Yuishin Takagi, Yasushi Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy is the first-line treatment option for Parkinson’s disease, and levodopa is considered the most effective drug for managing motor symptoms. However, side effects such as motor fluctuation and dyskinesia have been associated with levodopa treatment. For these conditions, alternative therapies, including invasive and non-invasive medical devices, may be helpful. This review sheds light on current progress in the development of devices to alleviate motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. METHODS: We first conducted a narrative literature review to obtain an overview of current invasive and non-invasive medical devices and thereafter performed a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these devices. RESULTS: Our review revealed different characteristics of each device and their effectiveness for motor symptoms. Although invasive medical devices are usually highly effective, surgical procedures can be burdensome for patients and have serious side effects. In contrast, non-pharmacological/non-surgical devices have fewer complications. RCTs of non-invasive devices, especially non-invasive brain stimulation and mechanical peripheral stimulation devices, have proven effectiveness on motor symptoms. Nearly no non-invasive devices have yet received Food and Drug Administration certification or a CE mark. CONCLUSION: Invasive and non-invasive medical devices have unique characteristics, and several RCTs have been conducted for each device. Invasive devices are more effective, while non-invasive devices are less effective and have lower hurdles and risks. It is important to understand the characteristics of each device and capitalize on these. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9020378/ /pubmed/35462692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.807909 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fujikawa, Morigaki, Yamamoto, Oda, Nakanishi, Izumi and Takagi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fujikawa, Joji
Morigaki, Ryoma
Yamamoto, Nobuaki
Oda, Teruo
Nakanishi, Hiroshi
Izumi, Yuishin
Takagi, Yasushi
Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials
title Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort therapeutic devices for motor symptoms in parkinson’s disease: current progress and a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.807909
work_keys_str_mv AT fujikawajoji therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT morigakiryoma therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yamamotonobuaki therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT odateruo therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nakanishihiroshi therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT izumiyuishin therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT takagiyasushi therapeuticdevicesformotorsymptomsinparkinsonsdiseasecurrentprogressandasystematicreviewofrecentrandomizedcontrolledtrials